Melzig et al.
JOCNote
such as IMes HCl,14 we have found that the most efficient and
alkylzinc bromide underwent also a smooth cross-coupling
with the 2,4,6-trisubstituted triazine 4e, affording the func-
tionalized triazine 6o in 68% yield (entry 15). Finally, the
reaction of 2-(methylthio)-1,3-benzoxazole (4c) with 5-cyano-
5-methylhexylzinc bromide (5m) provided the alkylated
benzoxazole 6p in 82% yield (entry 16).
3
robust system is Ni(acac)2 (1 mol %) associated with DPE-Phos
(2 mol %), giving quantitative yield of 3 after 9 h at 25 °C (entry
12).15 Using Ni(acac)2 (2.5 mol %) and DPE-Phos (5.0 mol %)16
a broad reaction scope was achieved and most cross-couplings
could be completed in 3-48 h at 25 °C (Scheme 1).
Thus, the cross-coupling proceeds well with a range of
functionalized aryl- and heteroarylzinc reagents.17 The reac-
tion of 6,7-dimethoxy-4-(methylthio)quinazoline (4a) with
4-ethoxycarbonylphenylzinc iodide (5a) provided the func-
tionalized quinazoline 6a in 82% yield (entry 1 of Table 2).
The thiomethyl-substituted pyrazine (4b) reacted with 3-
ethoxycarbonylphenylzinc iodide (5b), providing pyrazine
6b in 74% yield (entry 2). Electron-rich zinc reagents (5c,d)
reacted smoothly with benzoxazole 4c and the disubstituted
pyrimidine 4d, leading to the polyfunctional heterocycles 6c
and 6d in 81-96% yield (entries 3 and 4). The reaction of
trifluoromethylated pyrimidine 4d with 2-thienylzinc iodide
(5e) gave the pyrimidine 6e in 94% yield (entry 5). This
heteroarylic zinc reagent also underwent cross-coupling with
dimethoxy-substituted triazine (4e), yielding the trisubsti-
tuted product 6f in 87% yield (entry 6).
The reaction protocol could be applied to benzylic zinc
reagents.18 The thiomethylated pyridazine 4f reacted with 4-
fluorobenzylzinc chloride (5f), furnishing the pyridazine 6g in
74% yield (entry 7). Similarly, the pyrimidine 4g, pyridine 4h,
benzothiazole 4i, and isoquinoline 4j could be cross-coupled
with benzylic zinc reagents bearing sensitive functional groups
such as an ester, a nitrile, a ketone, or a trifluoromethyl group,
leading to the heterocyclic diarylmethanes 6h-l in 70-94%
yield (entries 8-12). Also, 4-(2-furyl)-2-methylthio-6-trifluoro-
methylpyrimidine (4k) could readily be functionalized using
the electron-rich benzylic zinc reagent 5k, providing the pyri-
midine 6m in 89% yield (entry 13).
In summary, we have developed a novel Ni-catalyzed
cross-coupling reaction that uses the inexpensive and com-
mercially available Ni(acac)2/DPE-Phos system (2.5 and 5
mol %) and takes place at room temperature, furnishing the
expected heterocyclic products in 68-96% yield. A wide
range of functional groups is tolerated, and various kinds of
zinc reagents (alkyl, aryl, heteroaryl, and benzylic) can be
utilized.
Experimental Section
Representative Preparation of 2-(3-pentanoylbenzyl)nico-
tinonitrile (6j). In a dry argon-flushed Schlenk flask equipped
with a septum and a magnetic stirring bar were dissolved
2-(methylthio)nicotinonitrile (4h) (150 mg, 1.00 mmol), Ni(acac)2
(6.4 mg, 2.5 mol %), and DPE-Phos (27 mg, 5.0 mol %) in THF (1
mL). After 10 min of stirring, (3-pentanoylbenzyl)zinc chloride (5i)
(3.41 mL, 1.50 mmol, 0.44 M in THF) was added dropwise, and the
reaction mixture was stirred for 5 h at room temperature until GC
analysis of a hydrolyzed aliquot showed full conversion of the
electrophile. The reaction mixture was quenched with saturated
aqueous K2CO3 solution (15 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (3 ꢀ
25 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (Na2SO4), andthe
solvent was removed in vacuo. Purification by flash chromato-
graphy (silica gel, pentane/Et2O 4:6) afforded the pyridine 6j (221
mg, 79%) as a clear oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz) δ (ppm) 0.92
(t, J = 7.31 Hz, 3H), 1.32-1.44 (m, 2H), 1.63-1.73 (m, 2H), 2.93
(t, J = 7.43 Hz, 2H), 4.43 (s, 2H), 7.28 (dd, J = 7.80, 4.83 Hz, 1H),
7.36-7.41 (m, 1H), 7.53-7.57 (m, 1H), 7.79-7.83 (m, 1H),
7.91-7.96 (m, 2H), 8.73 (dd, J = 4.83, 1.36 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR
(CDCl3, 150 MHz) δ (ppm) 13.9 (CH3), 22.4 (CH2), 26.4 (CH2),
38.3 (CH2), 42.8 (CH2), 109.2, 116.7, 121.5 (CH), 126.6 (CH),
128.7 (CH), 128.9 (CH), 133.5 (CH), 137.5, 137.8, 140.7 (CH),
152.6 (CH), 162.9, 200.3. IR (Diamond-ATR, neat) ν~/cm-1 2956
(m), 2931 (m), 2870 (w), 2227 (w), 1680 (vs), 1580 (m), 1564 (m),
1429 (s), 1265 (m), 1255 (m), 1225 (m), 1174 (m), 1157 (m), 1093
(m), 804 (s), 776 (m), 712 (m), 691 (s). MS (EI, 70 eV) m/z (%) 278
(Mþ, 13), 237 (7), 236 (40), 235 (11), 222 (15), 221 (100), 219 (7),
194 (6), 193 (23), 192 (32). HRMS (EI) calcd for C18H18N2O,
278.1419; found, 278.1417 (Mþ).
Furthermore, this Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling reaction
also takes place with alkylzinc reagents.17 Hence pyrimidine
4l reacted with 4-cyanopropylzinc bromide (5l), furnishing
the alkylated product 6n in 84% yield (entry 14). This
(11) Kranenburg, M.; van der Burgt, Y. E. M.; Kamer, P. C. J.; Goubitz,
K.; Fraanje, J.; van Leeuwen, P. W. N. M. Organometallics 1995, 14, 3081.
(12) Alcock, N. W.; Brown, J. M.; Hulmes, D. I. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1993, 4, 743.
(13) Hamann, B. C.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7369.
(14) Arduengo, A. J. III; Rasika Dias, H. V.; Harlow, R. L.; Kline, M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5530.
(15) Melzig, L.; Gavryushin, A.; Knochel, P. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5529.
(16) The catalyst and ligand loading was raised from 1 mol % Ni(acac)2 to
2.5 mol % to decrease the reaction time especially in the case of unreactive
zinc reagents such as 5j or 5l.
(17) All aryl- and alkylzinc reagents were prepared according to
Krasovskiy, A.; Malakhov, V.; Gavryushin, A.; Knochel, P. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6040.
Acknowledgment. We thank the DFG and the European
Research Council (ERC) for financial support. We thank
Chemetall GmbH(Frankfurt) and BASF SE (Ludwigshafen)
for the generous gift of chemicals.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental proce-
dures and full characterization of all compounds. This material
(18) All benzylic zinc reagents were prepared according to Metzger, A.;
Schade, M. A.; Manolikakes, G.; Knochel, P. Chem. Asian J. 2008, 3, 1678.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 6, 2010 2133