Salvadori et al.
JOCArticle
catalysts require more drastic reaction conditions than
homogeneous ones, but this does not cause problems as far
as the stability of the catalysts is concerned. The somewhat
lower activity can be compensated by using higher tempera-
tures and catalyst loadings. Among heterogeneous Pd
sources, palladium activated on carbon (Pd/C) is a commer-
cially available, inexpensive palladium catalyst used only for
hydrogenations before the 1990s.8 More recently, different
coupling procedures5 for carbon-carbon, carbon-oxygen,
and carbon-nitrogen bond formation in the presence of Pd/
C have been published.1,9-11 In comparison with other
expensive and air-sensitive Pd catalysts, Pd/C is more easily
handled and can be recovered from the reaction mixture by
simple filtration and reused. It is very stable under acid and
basic conditions and has a much higher surface area than
alumina- and silica-supported catalysts. It is now the domi-
nant heterogeneous catalyst for industrial application of Pd-
catalyzed reactions.
Palladium-catalyzed carbonylation of aryl halides in the
presence of nucleophiles is an important atom-economic
reaction that can be applied to the synthesis of a wide range
of arylcarbonyl compounds12 such as ketones, carboxylic
acids, esters, or amides that can be easily obtained either in
solution12b,13 or in the solid phase.12e Most of the carbonyla-
tion procedures reported in the literature are based on the use
of homogeneous Pd catalysts in the presence of phosphine
ligands.14 However, an excess of phosphine is often required
to avoid catalyst deactivation, and its separation from the
reaction products and regeneration is usually difficult, limit-
ing the applicability of carbonylation procedures.15
reported the use of Pd/C to obtain aromatic esters. The
procedure has been efficiently applied to the synthesis of
polymers using 150 psi of carbon monoxide and heating the
reaction mixture at 150 °C for 6 h. Moreover, an excess of
nucleophile as well as the use of toxic benzene were required
to run the reaction to completion. Chen and Xia18b recently
extended the application of Pd/C to alkoxycarbonylation
and carbonylative Sonogashira coupling reactions of aryl
iodides in the absence of copper and phosphine ligands. The
procedure for alkoxycarbonylation required a pressure of
CO from 72 to 300 psi and temperature of 130 °C. Moreover,
the nucleophile was used as the solvent, limiting the applica-
tion of the procedure to nonvolatile alcohols. On the other
hand, the use of a more sophisticated heterogeneous cata-
lysts for aminocarbonylation reaction of aryl halide has been
ꢀ
recently investigated in a continuous flow reactor by Csajagi
and co-workers.19
Despite its well-known toxicity, CO is a very valuable and
convenient reagent for a variety of reasons: (i) it is thermally
quite stable and yet chemically reactive, and (ii) it is an
inexpensive carbon source, which can be incorporated into a
variety of organic compounds in its entirety without produ-
cing any undesirable byproduct. Since its toxicity problem
can satisfactorily be dealt with in many instances, CO can be
considered an environmentally friendly and convenient C
source in an overall sense.12a,20 Mo(CO)6 is a potential
alternative source of CO that was applied to the traditional
and microwave-assisted synthesis of amides, esters, and
carboxylic acids starting from aryl halides or triflates.21
However, Mo(CO)6 is highly toxic, and its (over)stoichio-
metric use results in extreme metal waste, a potential pro-
blem in scale-up.22 Recently, Leadbeater and Kormos first
reported microwave-promoted hydroxy- and alkoxycarboxy-
lation of aryl iodides using heavy-walled quartz reaction
vessels prepressurized with CO in the presence of Pd(OAc)2
as catalyst; in addition, in this procedure the nucleophile of the
reaction is the solvent.23
Only one patent and three papers report the use of Pd/C in
the carbonylation of aryl halides for the synthesis of car-
boxylic acids or esters.16-18 Sugi and co-workers18a first
(8) For recent applications of hydrogenation using Pd/C, see: (a) Du, R.;
Zhu, C.; Zhang, P.; Fan, R. Synth. Commun. 2008, 38, 2889–2897. (b) Mori,
A.; Mizusak, T.; Kawase, M.; Maegawa, T.; Monguchi, Y.; Takao, S.;
Takagi, Y.; Sajiki, H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 406–410. (c) Kumar,
G. D. K.; Baskaran, S. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 4520–4523.
(9) (a) Hagiwara, H.; Shimizu, Y.; Hoshi, T.; Suzuki, T.; Ando, M.;
Ohkubo, K.; Yokoyamac, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4349–4351. (b) El
Mi, B.; Vasapollo, G.; Alper, H. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 4739–4741.
(10) Beller, M.; Morandi, W. A.; Eckert, M.; Neumann, H. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1999, 40, 4523–4526.
Lately, improvements in design of commercial microwave
ovens for organic synthesis allowed the controlled introduc-
tion of gases inside the reaction tube that can be considered
as a potential autoclave. With this kind of apparatus,
hydroformylation,24 hydroaminomethylation,25 hydrogena-
tion,26 and hydroxy-,23a alkoxy-,23b and aminocarbonyla-
tion27 have been performed under mild conditions.28 Taking
(11) Lin, Y.-S.; Alper, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 779–781.
€
(12) (a) Brennfuhrer, A.; Neumann, H.; Beller, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
€
ꢀ
2009, 48, 4114–4133. (b) Skoda-Foldes, R.; Kollar, L. Curr. Org. Chem. 2002,
6, 1097–1119. (c) El Ali, B.; Alper, H. Synlett 2000, 161–171. (d) Ma, S.; Wu,
B.; Jiang, X. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 2588–2593. (e) Takahashi, T.; Inoue, H.;
Tomida, S.; Doi, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7843–7846.
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
(13) Beller, M.; Cornils, B.; Frohning, C. D.; Kohlpaintner, C. W. J. Mol.
Catal. A: Chem. 1995, 104, 17–85.
(14) For an example of homogeneous catalyzed carbonylation reaction in
the presence of phosphine ligands, see: (a) Sans, V.; Trezeciak, A.-M.; Luis,
(19) Csajagi, C.; Bercsek, B.; Niesz, K.; Kovacs, I.; Szekelyhidi, Z.; Bajko,
Z.; Urge, L.; Darvas, F. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1589–1592.
(20) Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry for Organic Synthesis;
Wiley: New York, 2002; Vol. 2.
ꢀ
S.; Ziolkowski, J. J. Catal. Lett. 2006, 109, 37–41. (b) Wallow, T. I.; Novak,
(21) (a) Wu, X. Y.; Larhed, M. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 3094–3098. (b)
Wannberg, J.; Larhed, M. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5750–5753. (c) Odell,
L. R.; Savmarker, J.; Larhed, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 6115–6118.
(22) (a) Wan, Y.; Altermann, M.; Larhed, M.; Hallberg, A. J. Org. Chem.
2002, 67, 6232–6235. (b) Wan, Y.; Altermann, M.; Larhed, M.; Hallberg, A.
J. Comb. Chem. 2003, 5, 82–84.
B. M. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 5034–5037. (c) Urata, H.; Maekawa, H.;
Takahashi, S.; Fuchikami, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 56, 4320–4322. (d)
Beller, M.; Eckert, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1010–1027. (e) Frisch,
A. C.; Beller, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 674–688. (f) Ozawa, F.;
Sugimoto, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, A. Organometallics 1984, 3, 692–
ꢀ
697. (g) Takacs, A.; Acs, P.; Farkas, R.; Kokotos, G.; Kollar, L. Tetrahedron
2008, 64, 9874–9878.
ꢀ
(23) (a) Kormos, C. M.; Leadbeater, N. E. Synlett 2006, 1663–1666. (b)
Kormos, C. M.; Leadbeater, N. E. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 65–68.
(24) Mann, A.; Petricci, E.; Rota, A.; Schoenfelder, A.; Taddei, M. Org.
Lett. 2006, 8, 3725–3727.
(25) Petricci, E.; Salvadori, J.; Mann, A.; Taddei, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
2007, 48, 8501–8504.
(15) Ionic liquids have been used as well for the recycling of the catalyst;
for an example of the use of ionic liquids in carbonylation reactions, see: (a)
Zhu, B.; Jiang, X. Synlett 2006, 2795–2798. (b) Lancaster, M. Green Chem. R.
Soc. Chem. 2002. (c) Riisagera, A.; Fehrmann, R.; Haumann, M.; Wasserscheid,
P. Top. Catal. 2006, 40, 91–102.
(26) (a) Piras, L.; Genesio, E.; Ghiron, C.; Taddei, M. Synlett 2008, 1125–
1128. (b) Vanier, G. S. Synlett 2007, 131–135.
(16) Eisenstadt, A. European Patent EP0461322, 1990.
(17) Tambade, P. J.; Patil, Y. P.; Bhanushali, M. J.; Bhanage, B. M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 2221–2224.
(27) Cardullo, F.; Donati, D.; Merlo, G.; Paio, A.; Petricci, E.; Taddei,
M. Syntlett 2009, 47–50.
(18) (a) Ramesh, C.; Nakamura, R.; Kubota, Y.; Miwa, M.; Sugi, Y.
Synthesis 2003, 501–504. (b) Chen, J. J.; Xia, C. J. Catal. 2008, 253, 50–56.
(28) For a review on the argument, see: Petricci, E.; Taddei, M. Chem.
Today 2007, 25, 40–45.
1842 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 6, 2010