Scheme 3 Synthetic routes for the preparation of 3 and 4.
Scheme 2 Outline of the phototriggered Zn2+-release system with
J1 = 4.9 Hz, J2 = 4.1 Hz), 7.63 (t, 2H, J1 = 4.2 Hz,
J2 = 4.9 Hz), 7.41–7.39 (m, 4H).
dual binding-sites.
A
mixture of 4-(benzo[d]oxazol-2-yl) benzaldehyde25
(223 mg, 1.0 mmol) and 2-aminophenol (120 mg, 1.1 mmol)
dissolved in anhydrous EtOH (20 ml) was stirred at room
temperature for 0.5 h. During this time, the color of the
solution gradually changed from colorless to yellow-green,
and a yellow precipitate was produced. The yellow product
was filtered off and washed with EtOH. The crude product was
purified by recrystallisation from hexane to give 4 (2-((4-
(benzo[d]oxazol-2-yl)methyleneamino)phenol) in 78% yield
(245 mg). 1H NMR (CDCl3): 8.77 (s, 1H), 8.39 (d, 2H,
J = 8.24 Hz), 8.08 (d, 2H, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.81 (t, 1H,
J1 = 4.9 Hz, J2 = 4.0 Hz), 7.62 (t, 1H, J1 = 4.1 Hz, J2 =
4.9 Hz), 7.41–7.33 (m, 3H), 7.24 (t, 2H, J1 = 7.2 Hz, J2 =
7.4 Hz), 7.06 (d, 1H, J = 7.9 Hz), 6.93 (t, 1H, (t, 1H, J1 = 7.9 Hz,
J2 = 7.3 Hz).
2. Experimental
General
1H NMR spectra were recorded at 400 MHz with TMS as an
internal reference and CDCl3 as solvent. UV absorption
spectra were measured with an absorption spectrophotometer
(Hitachi U-3010). All chemicals for synthesis were purchased
from commercial suppliers, and solvents were purified according
to standard procedures. Reactions were monitored by TLC
silica gel plates (60F-254). Column chromatography was
performed on silica gel (Merck, 70–230 mesh). A lamp
with 365 nm (30 W) light was used as the light source for
photoreactions.
Material
3. Results and discussion
Ligand 1 was prepared by the general method described in the
literature,22 and the detailed procedure is presented as follows:
terephthalaldehyde (6.7 g, 50 mmol) in ethanol (30 ml) was
added to a solution of 2-aminophenol (11 g, 100 mmol) in
ethanol (30 ml). The solution mixture was refluxed. When no
starting material (terephthalaldehyde) was detectable by TLC
plate, the mixture was cooled, and the crude product removed
by filtration. Recrystallisation from n-butanol gave ligand 1 in
78% yield (12.3 g). mp = 221–223 1C (lit.22 220–221 1C).
1H NMR (CDCl3): 8.76 (s, 2H), 8.03 (s, 4H), 7.36 (d, J =
8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.26–7.21 (m, 4H), 7.05 (d, J = 8.1, 2H), 6.93
(t, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 8.0 Hz, 2H).
The absorption changes of ligand 1 (lmax = 387 nm, e = 3.1 ꢁ
104 L molꢂ1 cmꢂ1, in CH3CN) with the addition of Zn2+ were
presented in Fig. 1. The absorption at 387 nm decreased,
whilst a new band at 465 nm appeared, which corresponded to
the absorption of the complex of ligand 1 binding to
Zn(OAc)2. The optical density of the complex is not increased
until a stoichiometric amount of Zn2+ (1.0 equiv.) is added to
the solution, which reveals the formation of a 1 : 1 complex.
This formation is confirmed by the plot of the optical density
of the complex against the amount of Zn2+ (inset in Fig. 1)
according to the literature method,26,27 and a binding constant
(Kb = 3.3 ꢁ 103 Mꢂ1) was estimated from the changes in the
spectral intensities by using the Excel program.28
3
and
4
(2-((4-(benzo[d]oxazol-2-yl)methyleneamino)-
phenol) were prepared according to the literature23 and are
illustrated in Scheme 3, and the detailed procedures and
spectra data were as follows: a mixture of 2-((E)-((E)-4-((E)-
(2-hydroxyphenylimino)methyl)benzyli-dene)amino)phenol
(158 mg, 0.5 mmol) and lead acetate, Pb(OAc)4 (244 mg,
0.55 mmol), dissolved in 20 ml of CHCl3 was refluxed for
2 h. The solution was filtered and the filtrate was extracted with
CH2Cl2–H2O (v/v = 1/1, 10 ml ꢁ 3). The combined organic
solution was dried over Na2SO4. The resulting solution was
concentrated and the crude product was purified by recrystal-
lisation from ethyl benzoate to give 3 (bis-p-phenylene-20-
benzoxazole) in 10% yield (16.2 mg). mp = 354–356 1C
Upon 365 nm light irradiation, the absorption of the
complex at 465 nm and 387 nm decreased and disappeared
with increase of irradiation time and, accompanying this
process, three new bands at 353, 336, 322 nm, respectively,
which were attributed to the absorption of 2, appeared
(Fig. 2). Comparing the absorption of 2 with that of 3, which
was prepared according to the literature23 and was illustrated
in the experimental, it was found that the absorption spectra
of 2 was similar to that of 3 (inset in Fig. 2), and absorption
bands for both were exactly at 353, 336, 322 nm, respectively.
As presented in Fig. 2, the absorption at 465 nm and 387 nm
disappeared completely when the solution of the complex was
1
(lit.24 354 1C). H NMR (CDCl3): 8.43 (s, 4H), 7.82 (t, 2H,
ꢀc
This journal is the Owner Societies 2010
1178 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12, 1177–1181