Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry 2009, 5, No. 77.
line materials was confirmed in each case by repeated measure- Acknowledgement
ments of the unit cell dimensions from several randomly chosen This research was supported by The Israel Science Foundation
single crystals.
(Grant No. 502/08).
References
The diffraction measurements were carried out on a Nonius
KappaCCD diffractometer, using graphite monochromated Mo
Kα radiation (λ = 0.7107 Å). The crystalline samples of the
analyzed compounds were covered with a thin layer of light oil
and freeze-cooled to ca. 110 K in order to minimize solvent
escape, structural disorder, and thermal motion effects, and
increase the precision of the results. The structures were solved
by direct methods (SIR-97) and refined by full-matrix least-
squares on F2 (SHELXL-97). Intensity data were corrected for
absorption effects. All non-hydrogen atoms (except of those of
the disordered pyridyl group and TCE solvent in I and the
disordered solvent in II) were refined anisotropically. The
hydrogens were either found in difference Fourier maps or
located in idealized positions, and were refined using a riding
model with fixed thermal parameters [Uij = 1.2 or 1.5 Uij (eq.)
for the atom to which they are bonded]. No phase transitions of
the two crystalline compounds were detected between room
temperature and 110 K. The two polymeric structure types
contain sizeable voids, which are accommodated by molecules
of crystallization solvent (three molecules of TCE in I, and one
moiety of o-dichlorobenzene and three molecules of methanol
in II). In II, the solvent species could be clearly identified in the
electron-density maps but they were found to be severely
disordered in the lattice and could not be reliably modeled by
discrete atoms. Correspondingly, their contribution to the
diffraction pattern was subtracted by the Squeeze procedure
(commonly used in similar situations) [25], allowing smooth
convergence of the crystallographic refinement and precise
description of the hydrogen-bonded framework.
1. Fleischer, E. B. Inorg. Chem. 1962, 1, 493–495.
2. Collins, D. M.; Hoard, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 3761–3771.
3. Fleischer, E. B.; Shachter, A. M. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30, 3763–3769.
4. Krupitsky, H.; Stein, Z.; Goldberg, I.; Strouse, C. E.
J. Inclusion Phenom. Mol. Recognit. Chem. 1994, 18, 177–192.
5. Abrahams, B. F.; Hoskins, B. F.; Michail, D. M.; Robson, R. Nature
6. Hagrman, D.; Hagrman, P. J.; Zubieta, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999,
38, 3165–3168.
7. Sharma, C. V. K.; Broker, G. A.; Huddleston, J. G.; Baldwin, J. W.;
Metzger, R. M.; Rogers, R. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
8. Barkigia, K. M.; Battioni, P.; Riou, V.; Mansuy, D.; Fajer, J.
9. Carlucci, L.; Ciani, G.; Proserpio, D. M.; Porta, F.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 317–322.
10.Carlucci, L.; Ciani, G.; Proserpio, D. M.; Porta, F. CrystEngComm
11.Ohmura, T.; Usuki, A.; Fukumori, K.; Ohta, T.; Ito, M.; Tatsumi, K.
12.Lin, K.-J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2730–2732.
13.Diskin-Posner, Y.; Patra, G. K.; Goldberg, I.
14.Pan, L.; Kelly, S.; Huang, X.; Li, J. Chem. Commun. 2002, 2334–2335.
15.Ring, D. J.; Aragoni, M. C.; Champness, N. R.; Wilson, C.
16.George, S.; Goldberg, I. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. E: Struct. Rep. Online
17.Koner, R.; Goldberg, I.
Supporting Information
Supporting information features X-ray data for compounds
I and II.
Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C: Cryst. Struct. Commun. 2009, 65,
18.Lipstman, S.; Goldberg, I. CrystEngComm 2010, 12, 52–54.
Supporting Information File 1
X-ray data for compound I.
19.Seidel, R. W.; Goddard, R.; Föcker, K.; Oppel, I. M. CrystEngComm
Published on the Web as an advance article.
Supporting Information File 2
X-ray data for compound II.
20.Koner, R.; Goldberg, I. CrystEngComm 2009, 11, 1217–1219.
21.Koner, R.; Goldberg, I. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem. 2009.
Published on the Web as an advance article.
22.Diskin-Posner, Y.; Dahal, S.; Goldberg, I. Chem. Commun. 2000,
Page 6 of 7
(page number not for citation purposes)