noate 10a in the presence of 10 mol % of the catalyst
(S)-2 (Scheme 3). The desired endo-product 11a was
Scheme 2. Enantioselective Synthesis of the Key Intermediate 3
Scheme 3. Asymmetric Diels-Alder Reaction of Allenic Ester
10a and Enantioselective Synthesis of Subunit 4
Villiger oxidation7 and alkaline hydrolysis of the lactone 7.
Dess-Martin periodinane (DMP) oxidation of the allylic
alcohol generated the enone 9, which without any purification
was treated with MeMgBr in THF at 0 °C. Simple aqueous
acid treatment of the resulting tertiary alcohol produced the
lactone 3 without any loss of enantiomeric purity.
obtained in 95% yield with 87:13 dr and 87% ee.
Reduction of the ester group followed by directed hydro-
genation10 using Wilkinson’s catalyst provided the desired
diastereomer 4 with good diastereoselectivity (dr 83:17)
without any optimization.
Although the subunit 4 could in principle be constructed
by an enantioselective Diels-Alder reaction of crotonalde-
hyde and 2,5-dimethylfuran followed by reduction of CHO
and CdC, in practice, this approach was not operable because
the required Diels-Alder step did not proceed, even at 0
°C. This failure is apparently due to strong steric repulsion
between the CH3 of crotonaldehyde and one of the CH3
groups of 2,5-dimethylfuran in the transition state. That
repulsion is especially consequential because the most
advanced bonding in the transition state involves C(ꢀ) of
the R,ꢀ-enal and C(R) of the furan component.8
The catalytic asymmetric Diels-Alder reaction exampli-
fied with allenic ester 10a in Scheme 3 has been found to
be quite general. Several other examples are summarized in
Table 1. The corresponding AlBr3-activated catalyst 13 (see
below) was found to be superior to catalyst 2 in most cases.
Diels-Alder adducts were obtained in high yields with
excellent levels of diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity.
This difficulty in the synthesis of the subunit 4 was
overcome by use of an asymmetric Diels-Alder reaction
employing an allenic ester as the dienophile (Vide infra).
Allenic esters are a class of highly reactive dienophiles, and
the corresponding Diels-Alder adducts are of synthetic
value. Despite the existence of a number of reports9 on
substrate-controlled diastereoselectiVe Diels-Alder reactions
of allenic esters, a catalytic enantioselective version of this
reaction has remained elusive.
The usefulness of these Diels-Alder adducts is illustrated
in Scheme 4. Hydrogenation of cycloadduct 11b under
carefully controlled conditions leads to selective reduction
of the endocyclic double bond with concomitant migration
of the exocyclic double bond. The resulting R,ꢀ-unsaturated
ester 14 can be reduced further to produce the fully saturated
product 15 as a single diastereomer (Scheme 4, eq 1). In
contrast, the corresponding 2,5-dimethylfuran adduct 11a
undergoes hydrogenation without migration of the exocyclic
double bond (Scheme 4, eq 2), and further reduction produces
17 as a single diastereomer. The later result is noteworthy
since hydrogenation of the corresponding alcohol 12 occurs
at the opposite face of the exocyclic double bond, as shown
in Scheme 3.
With the goal of an efficient approach to 4, we studied
the reaction of 2,5-dimethylfuran and trifluoroethyl alle-
(5) (a) Ryu, D. H.; Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6388–
6390. (b) Brown, M. K.; Corey, E. J. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 172–175.
(6) (a) Payette, J. N.; Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
12276–12278. (b) Li, P.; Payette, J. N.; Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 9534–9535.
(7) The Baeyer-Villiger oxidation must be conducted at 0 °C. Even
though the reaction at rt was found to be complete within 45 min, a
substantial amount of epoxide formation from the starting ketone was
observed together with other byproducts (see the Supporting Informa-
tion).
(8) (a) Ryu, D. H.; Zhou, G.; Corey, E. J. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1633–
1636. (b) Mukherjee, S.; Corey, E. J. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1024–1027.
(9) (a) Oppolzer, W.; Chapuis, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 4665–
4668. (b) Oppolzer, W.; Chapuis, C.; Dupuis, D.; Guo, M. HelV. Chim.
Acta 1985, 68, 2100–2114. (c) Henderson, J. R.; Chesterman, J. P.; Parvez,
M.; Keay, B. A. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 988–991.
(10) (a) Thompson, H. W.; Mcpherson, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96,
6232–6233. (b) Brown, J. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26, 190–
203. For a review on substrate-directable reactions, see: (c) Hoveyda, A. H.;
Fu, G. C.; Evans, D. A. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 1307–1370.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 8, 2010
1837