bioactive molecules and pharmaceuticals.5 Among many
methods developed in past years, 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition
reactions between nitrones and alkynes or metal acetylides
under the catalysis of transition metals or Lewis acids are
the most common synthetic methods for the construction of
2,3-dihydroisoxazoles.6 However, metal-catalyzed 1,3-dipolar
cycloadditions often furnish regioisomeric mixtures of ad-
ducts, proceed in low yield,6g-i or have functional group
tolerance.6a-c Herein, we report a base-catalyzed tandem
reaction7 of electron-deficient 1,3-conjugated enynes with
substituted hydroxylamines, providing a metal-free, efficient,
and regioselective approach to highly substituted 2,3-
dihydroisoxazoles.
Table 1. Screening Conditions for Tandem Reaction of 1a with 2a
entrya base (20 mol %) solvent temp (°C) yield of 3aaf (%)
1
Et3N
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
CH3CN
DCM
DCE
40
40
40
40
40
40
60
rt
rt
rt
0
77
44
<5
19
32
72
64
83
80
66
87
86
88
91
2
3b
4
DBU
NaHCO3
PhCO2Na
Et3N
Et3N
Et3N
DABCO
DMAP
Et3N
Et3N
Et3N
Recently, our group8 and others9 have demonstrated that
electron-deficient 1,3-conjugated enynes are readily available
and attractive precursors for the construction of various
acyclic and cyclic compounds. During these studies, we
envisaged that 2,3-dihydroisoxazoles might be prepared from
the corresponding electron-deficient 1,3-enynes and hydroxyl-
amines by tandem inter- and intramolecular nucleophilic
addition.
To test this hypothesis, enyne 1a and N-benzylhydroxyl-
amine 2a were subjected to DMF at 40 °C in the presence
of Et3N (20 mol %). Gratifyingly, the desired product 3aa
was obtained in 77% isolated yield after 4 h (Table 1, entry
1). Interestingly, the reaction gives 44% yield of 3aa without
any additional base, indicating that hydroxylamine itself can
play the role of a base (Table 1, entry 2). Other organic and
inorganic bases such as DBU, DABCO, DMAP, PhCO2Na,
5
6c
7
8
9d
10e
11
12
13
14
0
0
0
Et3N
a All reactions were carried out using 1a (0.3 mmol) and 2a (0.45 mmol)
in the presence of base under N2 atmosphere in solvent (2.5 mL) for 1-12
h. b DBU ) 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undecen-7-ene. c 10 mol % of Et3N.
d DABCO ) 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane. e DMAP ) 4-dimethylaminopyri-
dine. f Isolated yield.
and NaHCO3 were next tested. In contrast with the previous
result,8c DBU here failed to give the desired product (Table
1, entry 3), while DABCO (entry 9) or DMAP (entry 10)
catalyzed this reaction at ambient temperature, providing 3aa
in 80% and 66% yield, respectively. Both NaHCO3 (entry
4) and PhCO2Na (entry 5) are less effective. Furthermore,
the reaction temperature and catalyst loading were also
examined (Table 1, entries 6-8, 14). There is little solvent
effect on this tandem reaction (Table 1, entries 11-14).
Finally, we were pleased to find that 3aa could be isolated
in 91% yield after stirring at 0 °C in DCE for 1.5 h with 20
mol % of Et3N as catalyst (Table 1, entry 14, standard
conditions).
With the optimized conditions in hand, we next examined
the scope of this tandem reaction with various substituted
electron-deficient 1,3-conjugated enynes 1 and various N-
substituted hydroxylamines (Scheme 1). Several points are
noteworthy: (1) In general, highly substituted 2,3-dihy-
droisoxazoles can be prepared in moderate to excellent yields
under standard conditions from the corresponding electron-
deficient conjugated enynes and hydroxylamines. The yield
of 3ra is low because of the unstable substrate 1r. (2) Various
electron-withdrawing groups (EWG) such as ketone
(3ba-na), aldehyde (3ra), ester (3qa and 3uc), and amide
(3oa) can be effectively introduced to the products. (3) The
substituent on the alkene moiety (R1) can be an aryl
(3aa-3ad), alkyl (3ea), styryl (3la), or ester (3qa) group.
(4) The substituent (R2) on the alkyne moiety can also be
an aryl or alkyl (3ea) group. (5) Besides 2a, we also tested
other substituted or unsubstituted hydroxylamines such as
N-(naphthalen-1-ylmethyl) hydroxylamine (2b), MeNH(OH)·
(5) (a) Habeeb, A. G.; Praveen Rao, P. N.; Knaus, E. E. J. Med. Chem.
2001, 44, 2921. (b) FraleyM. E. Garbaccio, R. M.; Hartman, G. D. Patent
WO 2006023440, 2006.
(6) (a) Aschwanden, P.; Frantz, D. E.; Carreira, E. M. Org. Lett. 2000,
2, 2331. (b) Stoner, E. J.; Roden, B. A.; Chemburkar, S. Tetrahedron Lett.
1997, 38, 4981. (c) Fabio, M.; Ronzini, L.; Troisi, L. Tetrahedron 2008,
64, 4979. (d) Synthetic Applications of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Chemistry.
Toward Heterocycles and Natural Products; Padwa, A., Pearson, W. H.,
Eds.; Wiley: New York, 2002. (e) Tufarillio, J. J. In 1,3-Dipolar Cycload-
dition Chemistry; Padwa, A. Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1984; Vol. 2. (f)
Alcaide, B.; Almendros, P.; Alonso, J. M.; Aly, M. F.; Pardo, C.; Sa´ez, E.;
Torres, M. R. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1463. (g) Gonza´lez-Cruz, D.; Tejedor,
D.; de Armas, P.; Garc´ıa-Tellado, F. Chem.sEur. J. 2007, 13, 4823. (h)
Gonza´lez-Cruz, D.; Tejedor, D.; Armas, P.; Morales, E. Q.; Garc´ıa-Tellado,
F. Chem. Commun. 2006, 2798. (i) Benfatti, F.; Cardillo, G.; Contaldi, S.;
Gentilucci, L.; Mosconi, E.; Tolomelli, A.; Juaristi, E.; Reyes-Rangel, G.
Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 2478. (j) Cantagrel, F.; Pinet, S.; Gimbert, Y.;
Chavant, P. Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 2694. (k) Abbiati, G.; Arcadi, A.;
Marinelli, F.; Rossi, E.; Verdecchia, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 1027. (l)
Canterbury, D. P.; Frontier, A. J.; Um, J. M.; Cheong, P. H.-Y.; Goldfeld,
D. A.; Huhn, R. A.; Houk, K. N. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5147. (m) Debleds,
O.; Dal Zotto, C.; Vrancken, E.; Campagne, J.-M.; Retailleau, P. AdV. Synth.
Catal. 2009, 351, 1991.
(7) For representative reviews on cascade or domino reactions, see: (a)
Tietze, L. F. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 115. (b) Tietze, L. F.; Lieb, M. E. Curr.
Opin. Chem. Biol. 1998, 2, 363. (c) Rodriguez, J. Synlett 1999, 505. (d)
Tietze, L. F.; Brasche, G.; Gericke, K. M. Domino Reactions in Organic
Synthesis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2006. (e) Multicomponent reactions often
involve domino process, see: Multicomponent Reactions; Zhu, J., Bienayme´,
H., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2005.
(8) (a) Xiao, Y.; Zhang, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1903. (b)
Yu, X.; Ren, H.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, J. Chem.sEur. J. 2008, 14, 8481. (c)
Xiao, Y.; Zhang, J. Chem. Commun. 2009, 3594. (d) Liu, F.; Zhang, J.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5505. (e) Liu, R.; Zhang, J. Chem.sEur.
J. 2009, 15, 9303. (f) Gao, H.; Zhao, X.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, J. Chem.sEur. J.
2010, 16, 456. (g) Xiao, Y.; Zhang, J. Chem. Commun 2010, 46, 752.
(9) (a) Yao, T.; Zhang, X.; Larock, R. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
11164. (b) Yao, T.; Zhang, X.; Larock, R. C. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 7679.
(c) Liu, Y. H.; Zhou, S. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4609. (d) Patil, N. T.; Wu, H.;
Yamamoto, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 4531.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 8, 2010
1877