reaction conditions with easy availability for both enanti-
omers of the ligand, we prepared axially chiral amino alcohol
3 from chiral binaphthol.
Amino alcohols 3a-f were conveniently prepared from
binaphthol bistriflate 4 through a three-step reaction sequence
(Scheme 1). Monomethoxycarbonylation of 4 gave ester 5
3). The use of n-BuLi together with 3a did not show any
appreciable changes in the results (entry 2 and 5).4a Despite
repeated experiments, a sharp decrease of the conversion
yield was observed by increasing the amount of 3a to 5 mol
% (entry 8).
Next, we investigated the substituent effect of the amino
part of 3b-f on the level of asymmetric induction in the
addition of Et2Zn to benzaldehyde (Table 2). Under the
Scheme 1. Synthesis of
2-Dialkylaminomethyl-2′-hydroxy-1,1′-binaphthyl Derivativesa
Table 2. Addition of Diethylzinc to Benzaldehyde Using
Ligands 3a-f
convn
(%)a,b
ee
(%)a,c
entry
ligand
1
2
3
4
5d
6
7
3a
3b
3c
3d
3d
3e
3f
89 (9)
77 (11)
8 (20)
93 (5)
90 (7)
87 (8)
89 (5)
91
87
25
94
95
94
93
a (a) cat. Pd(OAc)2, dppp, CO (1 atm), MeOH, DMSO, 60%;
(b) Me2AlNR2, toluene, quantitative yields; (c) LAH, THF, 62-
79%.
a Determined by chiral GC (Chiraldex G-TA column). b Number in the
parentheses refers to the amount of benzyl alcohol produced. c Absolute
configuration assigned by comparison to the literature. d Using 5.4 mol %
of n-BuLi.
in 60% yield,5 and the conversion to amide 66 followed by
LAH reduction provided amino alcohols 3a-f.
The amino alcohol 3a was chosen for the initial experi-
ments. Reaction between 2 equiv of diethylzinc and benz-
aldehyde was carried out in toluene for 24 h to give (R)-
(+)-1-phenyl-2-propanol (Table 1). The best result was
reaction condition optimized for 3a, di-n-butylamino deriva-
tive 3b showed decreased conversion (entry 2), and bulkier
dibenzylamino derivative 3c resulted in only 8% conversion
(entry 3). The pyrrolidine analogue 3d was the most reactive
(93% conversion) and selective (94% ee) ligand (entry 4).
Under the same condition, ligand 3d showed a high level
of nonlinear effect in the reaction between diethylzinc and
benzaldehyde, 60% ee and 92% ee of the alcohol products
with 20% ee and 50% ee of 3d, respectively.7 This is in
contrast to the structurally related 2, which was reported to
have a fully linear relationship between the enantiomeric
excess of 2 and the alcohol products.4b The difference can
Table 1. Addition of Diethylzinc to Benzaldehyde Using
Ligand 3a
mol %
Et2Zn
convn
(%)a,b
ee
(%)a,c
entry
(3a )
(equiv)
(3) For selected reports on diphenylzinc additions, see: (a) Zhang, H.;
Wue, F.; Mac, T. C.; Chan, K. S. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 51, 8002-8003. (b)
Huang, W.-S.; Pu, L. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4222-4223. (c) Huang, W.-
S.; Pu, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 145-149. (d) Bolm, C.; Hermanns,
N.; Hildebrand, J. P.; Muniz, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3465-
3467. (e) Bolm, C.; Kesselgruber, M.; Hermanns, N.; Hildebrand, J. P.;
Raabe, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1488-1490.
(4) (a) Vyskocil, S.; Jaracz, S.; Smrcina, M.; Sticha, M.; Hanus, V.;
Polasek, M.; Kocovsky, P. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 7727-7737. (b)
Bringmann, G.; Breuning, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 667-679.
(5) Ohta, T.; Ito, M.; Inagaki, K.; Takaya, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993,
34, 1615-1616.
(6) (a) Basha, A.; Lipton, M.; Weinreb, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977,
18, 4171-4174. (b) Levin, J. I.; Turos, E.; Weinreb, S. M. Synth. Commun.
1982, 12, 989-993.
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
5
2
2
2
2
2
1.2
2
75 (11)
78 (11)
33 (9)
89 (9)
88 (7)
71 (9)
45 (17)
87
88
88
91
92
93
88
2d
3e
4
5d
6
7
a Determined by chiral GC (Chiraldex G-TA column). b Number in the
parentheses refers to the amount of benzyl alcohol produced. c Absolute
configuration assigned by comparison to the literature. d Using 5.4 mol %
of n-BuLi. e Reaction was carried out at 0 °C.
(7) (a) Puchot, C.; Samuel, O.; Dunach, E.; Zhao, S. H.; Agami, C.;
Kagan, H. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 2353-2357. (b) Soai, K.;
Shibata, T.; Morioka, H.; Choji, K. Nature 1995, 378, 767-768. (c)
Kitamura, M.; Okada, S.; Suga, S.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989,
111, 4028-4036. (d) Kitamura, M.; Suga, S.; Oka, H.; Noyori, R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9800-9809. (e) Chen, Y. K.; Costa, A. M.; Walsh,
P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5378-5379.
obtained with 3 mol % of 3a at room temperature (entry 4).
The ethylation at 0 °C was quite slow, and 58% of the
starting benzaldehyde remained unreacted after 24 h (entry
3760
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 21, 2002