1778 X. Shao et al.
of one sulfate moiety from m/z 352) as one of the major
product ions in the MS2 spectrum of molecular ion m/z 351
[M–H]– (Fig. 7(C)). Even our chromatography method did
not give us good separation of the sulfate metabolites of
pterostilbene and mono-hydroxylated pterostilbene. The
disappearance of peak 9 was observed in the LC chromato-
gram of urine after treatment with b-glucuronidase and
sulfatase (Fig. 2(D)). In addition, the MS3 spectrum of
product ion m/z 271 [M–H]– of peak 9 (MS3: m/z 271/351) was
identical to the MS2 spectrum of peak 7 (Figs. 7(A) and 7(C)),
which confirmed that peak 9 was the mono-sulfate meta-
bolite of mono-hydroxylated pterostilbene. Similar to the
mono-glucuronide metabolite, we observed only one sulfate
metabolite of the mono-hydroxylated pterostilbene. The
mono-sulfate metabolite can be generated from the sulfation
of mono-hydroxylated pterostilbene and/or the hydroxyl-
ation of pterostilbene 40-sulfate. Therefore, we tentatively
identify it as shown in Fig. 1.
oral gavage (Fig. 1 and Table 1). To our knowledge, this is the
first study to establish the mouse urinary metabolic profile of
pterostilbene using multi-stage tandem mass spectrometry.
Our results clearly indicate that pterostilbene can be
metabolized in mice to generate the mono-demethylated
and mono-hydroxylated metabolites. Pterostilbene and its
mono-demethylated and mono-hydroxylated metabolites
are good substrates for glucuronidation and sulfation to
form related phase II metabolites.
It has been reported that resveratrol is extensively meta-
bolized in vivo to generate the glucuronide and sulfate
metabolites which are predominantly circulated in plasma
and distributed to various tissues. Similarly, we found that
glucuronide and sulfate metabolites are also the major
metabolites of pterostilbene in mice. A possible metabolism
pathway is established based on our observations and the
literature reports on the biotransformation of resveratrol
(Fig. 1). It is worthwhile to further study the pharmacoki-
netics of pterostilbene and the tissue distribution of ptero-
stilbene and its major metabolites. Whether the newly
identified mono-demethylated, mono-hydroxylated, glucur-
onide, and sulfate metabolites of pterostilbene are bioactive
remains to be determined. The results would help us assess
the relative contribution of pterostilbene metabolites to the
disease preventive effects of pterostilbene.
In SIM mode with negative ESI-MS detection, we observed
one peak corresponding to molecular ion m/z 527 [M–H]–
(271 þ 176 þ 80) (peak 10 at 27.49 min, Fig. 7(D)). The MS2
spectrum of peak 10 had product ions m/z 447 (loss of one
sulfate moiety from m/z 527), m/z 351 (loss of one glucuronide
moiety from m/z 527), m/z 271 (loss of one glucuronide moiety
and one sulfate moiety from m/z 527), and m/z 175
(glucuronide moiety). All these features suggested that peak
10 was the glucuronide sulfate metabolite of mono-hydro-
xylated pterostilbene. In addition, the MS3 spectrum of the
product ion m/z 447 [M–H]– (MS3: m/z 447/527) was almost
identical to the MS2 spectrum of mono-hydroxylated
pterostilbene glucuronide (peak 8: m/z 447 [M–H]–) and
the MS3 spectrum of product ion m/z 351 [M–H]– (MS3: m/z
351/527) was almost identical to the MS2 spectrum of mono-
hydroxylated pterostilbene sulfate (peak 9: m/z 351 [M–H]–)
(Fig. 7(D)). All of these features suggested that that peak 10
was the glucuronide sulfate metabolite of mono-hydroxyl-
ated pterostilbene. The disappearance of peak 10 was
observed in the LC chromatogram of urine after treatment
with b-glucuronidase and sulfatase (Fig. 2(D)) further sup-
ported our conclusion that peak 10 was the glucuronide
sulfate metabolite of mono-hydroxylated pterostilbene. This
metabolite can be generated by further sulfation of the mono-
hydroxylated pterostilbene glucuronide (peak 8) or by
further glucuronidation of the mono-hydroxylated pteros-
tilbene sulfate (peak 9) (Fig. 1). Since we only observed one
peak, we tentatively identify it as shown in Fig. 1.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Additional supporting information may be found in the
online version of this article.
REFERENCES
1. Langcake P, Cornford CA, Pryce RJ. Phytochemistry 1979; 18:
1027.
2. Maurya R, Ray AB, Duah FK, Slatkin DJ, Schiff PL. J. Nat.
Prod. 1984; 47: 179.
3. Sehadri R. Phytochemistry. 1972; 11: 881.
4. Paul B, Masih I, Deopujari J, Charpentier C. J Ethnopharmacol.
1999; 68: 71.
5. Cichocki M, Paluszczak J, Szaefer H, Piechowiak A,
Rimando AM, Baer-Dubowska W. Mol. Nutr. Food Res.
2008; 52 (Suppl 1): S62.
6. Suh N, Paul S, Hao X, Simi B, Xiao H, Rimando AM, Reddy
BS. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007; 13: 350.
7. Pari L, Satheesh MA. Life Sci. 2006; 79: 641.
8. Rimando AM, Cuendet M, Desmarchelier C, Mehta RG,
Pezzuto JM, Duke SO. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002; 50: 3453.
9. Manickam M, Ramanathan M, Jahromi MA, Chansouria JP,
Ray AB. J. Nat. Prod. 1997; 60: 609.
10. Remsberg CM, Yanez JA, Ohgami Y, Vega-Villa KR,
Rimando AM, Davies NM. Phytother. Res. 2008; 22: 169.
11. Lambert JD, Sang S, Hong J, Kwon SJ, Lee MJ, Ho CT, Yang
CS. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2006; 34: 2111.
12. Baur JA, Sinclair DA. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006; 5: 493.
13. Li S, Wang Z, Sang S, Huang MT, Ho CT. Mol. Nutr. Food Res.
2006; 50: 291.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, using both LC/APCI-MS/MS and LC/ESI-
MS/MS analysis we successfully identified nine novel meta-
bolites of pterostilbene from mouse urine samples collected
24 h after administration of 200 mg/kg pterostilbene through
14. Steenwyk RC, Tan B. Xenobiotica 2010; 40: 62.
Copyright # 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2010; 24: 1770–1778
DOI: 10.1002/rcm