DMAP in CH2Cl2 in an open vessel system11,13 required 15
min of irradiation at a 150 W power output, whereas the
coupling reaction at room temperature14 took 48 h for the
complete disappearance of the starting materials.
From this point onward, the process is diversified to
accomplish reductive cyclizations to furnish aminoquinox-
alinones 5/6 with indole and indoline substitutions, respec-
tively (Scheme 2). Exposure of 4 to the catalytic transfer
hydrogenation conditions using palladium and ammonium
formate in refluxing methanol for 8 h or under microwave
irradiation (20 min, 180 °C) furnished indolylquinoxalinone
5 in a traceless fashion. Four transformations, (i) reduction
of two nitro functionalities, (ii) amide formation leading to
cyclative cleavage from the polymer support, (iii) oxidation
of newly generated dihydroquinoxalinone to quinoxalinone,
as well as (iv) oxidation of indoline to indole were observed
during this reaction. It should be mentioned that under these
conditions no additional oxidants17 or further air oxidation
step18 is required for the transformation of dihydroquinox-
alinone to quinoxalinone.
The expected indolinylquinoxalinone 6 was obtained from
the same intermediate 4 with the conventional protocol using
Zn and ammonium formate in methanol at room temperature.
This controlled reaction condition prevented the additional
oxidation of indoline to indole which was observed during
the earlier palladium-catalyzed transformation. The complete
cyclative cleavage during this reaction was monitored by
recording the proton NMR and IR spectrum of the recovered
polymer support. The upfield shift of the R-methylene
protons from δ 4.3 to 3.6 as well as disappearance of any
carbonyl stretching frequency confirmed the absolute trace-
less transformation. The polymer-free compounds 5 and 6
were obtained in excellent yields. The proton NMR monitor-
ing toward the formation of 5a and 6a from the key
intermediate 4a on a PEG support is shown in Figure 2. Six
To monitor the progression of the reaction, a small portion
of the reaction mixture was pulled out, the compound was
precipitated and washed with cold ether and dried, and the
proton NMR spectrum was recorded. Upon completion of
the reaction, the polymer-bound compound mixtures were
purified using a similar protocol, by precipitation and
washing with cold ether to remove excess reagents and dried
under vacuum. The crude product obtained was used as is
for reloading of next reaction mixtures. As we observed, use
of this PEG supported protocol drastically reduced the
reloading time.
In the next step, the amino functionality in compound 1
was unmasked using 10% piperidine in CH2Cl2 at room
temperature. The desired Fmoc deptotection using micro-
waves was achieved within 90 s (40 °C) leaving the polymer
support intact.15 The regenerated polymer bound amine 2
was then reacted with DFDNB in refluxing CH2Cl2 in the
presence of Et3N for 6 h to give polymer-bound dinitrofluoro-
substituted aniline compounds 3, ready for second ipso-fluoro
displacement. Because of probable low reactivity of the
immobilized aminoester-linked fluorodinitrobenzene 3, no
further double displacement was observed during this reac-
tion.
Our several efforts for the second aromatic substitution
on compound 3 by indoline using refluxing CH2Cl2 resulted
in an incomplete reaction (monitored by 1H NMR), whereas
in refluxing acetonitrile the reaction took 8 h for complete
conversion. It is noteworthy to mention that the microwave-
mediated acceleration in both ipso-fluoro displacement
reactions was also observed. The first aromatic displacement
using polymer-bound aminoester 2 was achieved in 8 min,
whereas the indoline substitution took 20 min for the
complete conversion in a microwave cavity. During all these
transformations, no yield loss was observed, suggesting the
presence of intact polymer support. Reaction progress and
stepwise transformations on a polymer support were cleanly
observed in proton NMR spectra.16
(7) (a) Li, X.; Yang, K.; Li, W.; Xu, W. Drugs Future 2006, 31, 979–
989. (b) Gupta, L.; Talwar, A.; Chauhan, P. M. S. Curr. Med. Chem. 2007,
14, 1789–1803. (c) Ramajayam, R.; Giridhar, R.; Yadav, M. R. Mini ReV.
Med. Chem. 2007, 7, 793–812. (d) Dunlop, J.; Marquis, K. L.; Lim, H. K.;
Leung, L.; Kao, J.; Cheesman, C.; Rosenzweig-Lipson, S. CNS Drug ReV.
2006, 12, 167–177
(8) Dodd, R. H.; Ouannes, C.; Potier, M. C.; de Carvalho, L. P.; Rossier,
J.; Potier, P. J. Med. Chem. 1987, 30, 1248–1254
(9) Glamkowski, E. J.; Fortunato, J. M.; Ong, H. H.; Allen, R. C.; Wilker,
J. C.; Geyer, H. M., III. J. Med. Chem. 1984, 27, 81–83
.
.
.
(10) (a) Yuan, Y.; Liu, G.; Li, L.; Wang, Z.; Wang, L. J. Comb. Chem.
2007, 9, 158–170. (b) Zhang, L.; Liu, G.; Zhang, S. D.; Yang, H. Z.; Li,
L.; Wu, X. H.; Yu, J.; Kou, B. B.; Xu, S.; Li, J.; Sun, G. C.; Ji, Y. F.;
Figure 2. Proton NMR monitoring toward the formation of 5a and
6a from key intermediate 4a.
Cheng, G. F. J. Comb. Chem. 2004, 6, 431–436
.
(11) Lin, M. J.; Sun, C. M J. Comb. Chem 2006, 8, 455–458
.
(12) All the microwave-assisted polymer-supported reactions were
performed in a CEM Discover Microwave in closed vessel system.
distinct sets of aromatic protons (Ha-f, as observed in 4a)
and two sets of methylene protons (Hg and Hh) were observed
(13) Lin, M. J.; Sun, C. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 8739–8742
.
(14) Chen, C. H.; Chang, C. M.; Chen, H. Y.; Lai, J. J.; Sun, C. M.
J. Comb. Chem. 2007, 9, 618–626.
(15) We reported microwave-mediated Fmoc deprotection under open
vessel conditions: Wu, C. Y.; Sun, C. M. Synlett 2002, 1709–1711.
(16) The stepwise 1H NMR monitoring toward the formation of key
intermediates 4 on a PEG support is included in the Supporting Information.
(17) Aoki, K.; Obata, T.; Yamazaki, Y.; Mori, Y.; Hirokawa, H.; Koseki,
J.; Hattori, T.; Niitsu, K.; Takeda, S.; Aburada, M.; Miyamoto, K. Chem.
Pharm. Bull. 2007, 55, 255–267.
(18) Krchn`a´k, V.; Szabo, L.; Va´gner, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41,
2835–2838.
2176
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 10, 2010