58ꢀ CHIMIAꢀ2010,ꢀ64,ꢀNo.ꢀ1/2ꢀ
From ChemiCal researCh to industrial appliCations
turned from slightly yellow into orange,
was stirred at 0 oC for 75 min. Methyl io-
dide (23.42 g, 0.165 mol, Fluka >99%) was
then added during 45 min while keeping
the temperature at 0–2 oC and the solution
was stirred for additional hour at 0 oC. The
resulting orange-yellow solution was then
evaporated on a rotary evaporator and wa-
ter (100 ml) and methyl-t-butyl ether (150
ml) was added to the residue. The organic
phase was separated, the aqueous layer
was diluted with 25% NaCl solution (50
ml) and extracted with methyl-t-butyl ether
(2 × 50 ml). The combined organic layers
were washed with 25% NaCl solution (2 ×
40 ml), dried over MgSO4 and evaporated.
The solid, slightly yellow residue (36.4
g) was dissolved in toluene (50 ml) and
high polydispersity (M /Mn = 1.9–4) and
is therefore not controllwed/living.
We were able to polymerize bulk n-
butylacrylate with 1 mol% of 9 at 140 oC.
However, the corresponding polymer, ob-
tained in 92% yield, was highly polydis-
perse (M /Mn = 8.6) which indicates an un-
controllewd polymerization in this case too.
4. Conclusions
Fig.ꢀ1.ꢀX-rayꢀstructureꢀofꢀ9.
We have reported a novel thione-thiol
rearrangement of dithiocarbonic acid O-
11 afforded in quantitative yield the hy-
droxylamine 10. Deprotonation of 10 with
n-butyllithium in THF followed by subse-
quent addition of CS2 and methyl iodide
yielded the rearranged compound 9 in
77% isolated yield instead of the expected
isomer 8. The TLC of the crude reaction
mixture before isolation showed that 9 is
the only product formed. The structure of 9
has been confirmed by elemental analysis,
(2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl) ester
affording the first example of the hitherto
unknown thionitroxide derivatives. The
new compound 9 is a radical initiator for
the thermal polymerization n-butylacrylate
even though the polymerization is not con-
trolled/living.
o
let crystallize at –20 C to afford 28.7 g
(77.3%) of 9 as almost white, malodorous
crystals, mp. 81–83 oC.
Anal.calcd.forC11H NOS2(247.42):C,
53.40; H, 8.56; N, 5.66; 2S1, 25.92. Found: C,
53.46; H, 8.35; N, 5.57; S, 25.94. MS(ESI):
m/z (%) = 248.2 (100) [M+H]+), 142.3 (60).
IR, cm–1: 1618 (C=O). 1H-NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3): d = 2.33 (s, 3 H, SCH3), 1.8–1.4 (m,
6 H, 3 × CH ), 1.34 (s, 6 H, 2 × CH3), 1.17
(s, 6 H, 2 ×2CH3). 13C-NMR (75.38 MHz,
CDCl3): d = 201.2 (CO), 60.1, 40.5, 32.2,
25.3, 17.3, 12.4. Crystals for X-ray analysis
were grown from acetonitrile.
Received: December 18, 2009
[2] W. A. Braunecker, K. Matyjaszewski, Progr.
[4] D. H. Solomon, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym.
Chem. 2005, 43, 5748.
[6] H. Fischer, A. Kramer, S. R. A. Marque, P.
[8] S. Miele, P. Nesvadba, A. Studer,
[13] F. Gagosz, S. Z. Zard, Synlett 1999, 1978.
[14] W. B. Ankers, R. F. Hudson, A. J. Lawson, J.
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1974, 1826.
[15] C. Zonta, O. De Lucchi, R. Volpicelli, L.
[16] G. C. Lloyd-Jones, J. D. Moseley, J. S. Renny,
Synthesis 2008, 661.
[17] M. Roth, R. Pfaendner, P. Nesvadba, M.-O. Zink,
WO Patent Publication No. WO2001090113,
2001.
[18] W. G. Skene, S. T. Belt, T. J. Connolly, P. Hahn,
[19] The supplementary crystallographic data
for 9 can be obtained free of charge from the
Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via
1
mass spectrometry, H and 13C-NMR and
IR-spectroscopy. Most striking is the pres-
ence of the strong >C=O group absorp-
tion at 1618 cm–1, the >C=S group of the
isomer 8 would not absorb in this region.
Moreover, the 13C-resonance at 201.2 ppm
is compatible with the structure 9 but not
8 whose >C=S signal is expected between
230–240 ppm. The ultimate proof of the
structure 9 was obtained by X-ray analysis
of single crystals grown from acetonitrile
(Fig. 1).
The detailed mechanism of this novel
rearrangement is not clear yet. However,
the observation that addition of one equiv-
alent of aqueous HCl instead of methyl io-
dide affords 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine
(TMP) and elemental sulfur instead of 10
and CS2 suggests that it is the Li-xantho-
genate 12 which rearranges into the Li-
dithiocarbonate 13. The methylation of 13
then affords 9. The formation of TMP and
sulfur via the mercapto amine 14 can be
plausibly explained (Scheme 3). Decom-
position of N-mercapto amines to amines
and sulfur is known.[24]
We suppose that the main contribution
to the thermodynamic driving force of the
novel rearrangement originates from the
transformation of a relatively weak C=S
bond into a strong C=O bond. Indeed, cal-
culations with DFT and Moeller-Plesset
theory (see Experimental) lead to the same
result indicating that the ground state en-
ergy (298 K, 1 atm) of 9 is 132.9 kJ/mol
resp. 132.5 kJ/mol lower than that of 8.
The compound 9 is a protected thio-
nitroxide, the novel rearrangement thus
opens a new access to thionitroxide de-
rivatives.[25] Bricklebank and Pryke report-
ed[26] that radical polymerization of styrene
in the presence of 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpi-
peridyl-1-thiyl affords polystyrene with
2.2 Bulk Polymerization of
n-Butylacrylate with (9)
A magnetically stirred solution of
9 (0.247 g, 1 mmol) in n-butyl acrylate
(12.82 g, 10 mmol) in a 50 ml round flask
was degassed by three vacuum/argon cy-
cles and was then heated at 140 oC for 90
min to afford colorless, very viscous poly-
1
mer. Integration of the H-NMR (CDCl3)
signals of the OCH2 groups of the unre-
acted monomer (4.16 ppm) and polymer
(4.0 ppm) indicated 92% conversion. GPC:
Mn = 67291, Mw = 580861, Mw/Mn = 8.6.
3. Results and Discussion
Reports on reactions of N,N-dialkyl
hydroxylamines with carbon disulfide are
very scarce. Haase and Wolffenstein ob-
served deoxygenation of diethyl- or diben-
zyl hydroxylamine upon heating with CS2,
however the structure of the products was
not conclusively elucidated.[22] Recently,
preparation of stable O-dialkylamino xan-
thates starting from diethyl- or benzylphe-
nyl hydroxylamine and their use as agents
for controlled/living radical polymeriza-
tion was described[23] in the patent litera-
ture, however, no analytical data were pro-
vided for these compounds.
(Code
CCDC-290324)
[20] E. R. Johnson, O. J. Clarkin, G. A. DiLabio, J.
[21] A. P. Scott, L. Radom, J. Phys. Chem. 1996,
100, 16502.
[22] F. Haase, R. Wolffenstein, Ber. Dtsch. Chem.
Ges. 1904, 37, 3228.
[23] D. Charmot, H.-T. Chang, V. Nava-Salgado,
US Patent Publication Application No. US
2004073042, 2004.
[26] N. Bricklebank, A. Pryke, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 2002, 2048.
Our attempted synthesis of 8 is depict-
ed in Scheme 3. Catalytic hydrogenation
of 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-N-oxyl