2558
G. R. Luedtke et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 2556–2559
the hinge region. The naphthyl group is shown able to occupy
the adjacent p38
ficity. While the
a
hydrophobic pocket attributed to kinase speci-
a-methylbenzyl moiety sits in another hydropho-
bic pocket, a distal hydrogen bond interaction is seemingly formed
between the amide carbonyl oxygen and Lys-53. In fact, there is
precedence for such a binding mode involving Lys-53 and N-3 of
imidazole-based inhibitors.33 Furthermore, this binding mode can
be used to explain the potencies obtained for all analogs shown
in Table 1. The only exception is the activity of the acetyl analog
11 which is more appropriate explained by the originally proposed
binding mode. Finally, the new model suggests that the amide sub-
stituent could potentially be modified to pick up additional inter-
actions with neighboring amino acid such as Asp-112, Ser-154,
Asp-168 and Tyr-35.
Figure 5. Cis and trans rotational isomers of 17. Calculations show that the cis
isomer is 7.54 kcal/mol lower in energy than the trans isomer.30
In summary, a novel series of N-pyridyl amides was identified
as potent inhibitors of p38
between the initial hit 2 and known p38
a
kinase. Based on structural similarities
inhibitors, sub-micro-
a
molar activity was quickly achieved by applying SAR known for
imidazole pyrimidine-based inhibitors. However, the results of
these SAR studies, were inconsistent with the initial binding mode
proposed based on the structural similarities between the two ser-
ies. The newly proposed binding mode of amide 17 indicated that,
in this series, an energetically more favorable cis conformer may be
the actual bioactive conformation.
Figure 6. Cis and trans rotational isomers of N-acetyl-N-methylaniline. The cis
isomer is the dominant structure as demonstrated by X-ray crystallography.
(compounds 10 and 11, respectively). However, elimination of this
group altogether (compound 1228) resulted in a complete loss of
activity. Finally, proper positioning of the amide bond seemed
key to binding as, in 1329 and 14,29 relocation of this group relative
References and notes
to compounds 2 and 4 resulted in no inhibition at 1 lM (Fig. 4).
Additional support for the importance of the amide is found in
the decrease in activity noted when alternative functional groups
were used (Fig. 4, compounds 1528 and 1628).
1. Jarvis, B.; Faulds, D. Drugs 1999, 57, 945.
2. Choy, E. H.; Panayi, G. S. N. Eng. J. Med. 2001, 344, 907.
3. Furst, D. E. Clin. Ther. 2004, 12, 1960.
4. Lee, J. C.; Laydon, J. T.; McDonnell, P. C.; Gallagher, T. F.; Kumar, S.; Green, D.;
McNutly, D.; Blumenthal, M. J.; Heyes, J. R.; Landvatter, S. W.; Strickler, J. E.;
McLaughlin, M. M.; Siemens, I. R.; Fisher, S. M.; Livi, G. P.; White, J. R.; Adams, J.
L.; Young, P. R. Nature 1994, 372, 739.
5. Lee, J. C.; Kassis, S.; Kumar, S.; Badger, A.; Adams, J. L. Pharmacol. Ther. 1999, 2–
3, 389.
6. Lee, J. C.; Kumar, S.; Griswold, D. E.; Underwood, D. C.; Votta, B. J.; Adams, J. L.
Immunopharmacology 2000, 47, 185.
7. Kumar, S.; Boehm, J.; Lee, J. C. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2003, 2, 717.
8. Saklatvala, J. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2004, 4, 372.
Moving beyond the SAR trends relative to pyridine substituents
and acyl groups, a surprising observation was noted while investi-
gating the significance of the 4-fluorobenzyl group. Specifically, it
was found that this group could be replaced by an ethyl group
(1728; IC50 0.313
lM) with no deleterious impact on potency relative
to compound 4. Since this result seemed to contradict predictions by
our initial binding model, we carried out more detailed modeling
experiments on compound 17. Subsequent conformational analysis
of 17 demonstrated that this compound could exist as a mixture of
cis and trans conformers with the cis conformer as the dominating
lower energy rotamer (Fig. 5).30 Furthermore, the structurally simi-
lar N-acyl-N-methylanilines are known to adopt lower energy cis
conformations as demonstrated through X-ray crystallography,
NMR and molecular orbital calculations (Fig. 6).31,32
9. Ashwell, J. D. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006, 33, 1447.
10. Foster, M. L.; Halley, F.; Souness, J. E. Drug News Perspect. 2000, 13, 488.
11. Pargellis, C.; Regan, J. Curr. Opin. Invest. Drugs 2003, 4, 566.
12. Smith, R. J. Drug Discovery Today 2005, 10, 1598.
13. Badger, A. M.; Bradbeer, J. N.; Votta, B.; Lee, J. C.; Adams, J. L.; Griswold, D. E. J.
Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1996, 279, 1453.
14. Kubota, T.; Miyagishima, M.; Alvarez, R. J.; Kormos, R.; Rosenblum, W. D.;
Demetris, A. J.; Semigran, M. J.; Dec, G. W.; Holubkov, R.; McTiernan, C. F.;
Mann, D. L.; Feldman, A. M.; McNamara, D. M. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2000, 19,
819.
15. Sticherling, M. Drug Discovery Today: Disease Mechanisms 2005, 2, 275.
16. Wagner, G.; Laufer, S. Med. Res. Rev. 2006, 26, 1.
Docking of the cis conformer into the p38a
binding site (Fig. 7)25
demonstrated that the pyridine nitrogen and 2-amino nitrogen
could still form two hydrogen bond interactions with Met-109 in
17. Diller, D. J.; Lin, T. H.; Metzger, A. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2005, 5, 953.
18. Hynes, J., Jr.; Leftheris, K. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2005, 5, 967.
19. Dominguez, C.; Powers, D. A.; Tamayo, N. Curr. Opin. Drug Disc. Dev. 2005, 4,
421.
20. Goldstein, D. M.; Gabriel, T. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2005, 5, 1017.
21. Goldstein, D. M.; Kuglstatter, A.; Lou, Y.; Soth, M. J. J. Med. Chem. doi:10.1021/
22. Yong, H.-Y.; Koh, M.-S.; Moon, A. Expert Opin. Invest. Drugs 2009, 18, 1893.
23. Mavunkel, B. J.; Perumattam, J. J.; Tan, X.; Luedtke, G. R.; Lu, Q.; Lim, D.; Kizer,
D.; Dugar, S.; Chakravarty, S.; Xu, Y.-j.; Jung, J.; Liclican, A.; Levy, D. E.; Tabora, J.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 1059.
24. Liverton, N. J.; Butcher, J. W.; Claiborne, C. F.; Claremon, D. A.; Libby, B. E.;
Nguyen, K. T.; Pitzenberger, S. M.; Selnick, H. G.; Smith, G. R.; Tebben, A.; Vacca,
J. P.; Varga, S. L.; Agarwal, L.; Dancheck, K.; Forsyth, A. J.; Fletcher, D. S.; Frantz,
B.; Hanlon, W. A.; Harper, C. F.; Hofsess, S. J.; Kostura, M.; Lin, J.; Luell, S.;
O’Neill, E. A.; Orevillo, C. J.; Pang, M.; Parsons, J.; Rolando, A.; Sahly, Y.; Visco, D.
M.; O’Keefe, S. J. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 2180.
25. Docking studies were conducted using a high-resolution p38
a X-ray structure
of p38 (PDB ID: 1ove). The extra-precision mode of Glide, a ligand–receptor
a
docking tool from Schrodinger, LLC, was used to generate a number of poses for
analogs 2, 3 and 17-cis, which were further filtered by visual inspection.
26. Shewchuk, L.; Hassell, A.; Wisely, B.; Rocque, W.; Holmes, W.; Veal, J.; Kuyper,
L. F. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 133.
27. Boehm, J. C.; Adams, J. L. Expert Opin. Ther. Patents 2000, 10, 25.
28. Tester, R.; Tan, X.; Schinzel, K.; Nashashibi, I.; Liang, W.; Jung, J.; Do, S.; Dugar,
S.; Luedtke, G. R. U.S. 2006/199821, 2006.
Figure 7. Docking overlay of 17-cis conformer with Merck imidazole pyrimidine
compound 3 within the ATP binding pocket of p38a kinase.