M. Asada et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 2639–2643
2643
7. Asada, M.; Obitsu, T.; Nagase, T.; Sugimoto, I.; Yamaura, Y.; Sato, K.; Narita, M.;
Ohuchida, S.; Nakai, H.; Toda, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 6567.
8. Castaner, J.; Wescott, A. L. Drugs Fut. 1978, 3, 59.
tion with 3,4-difluorobenzenesulfonamide produced 23–26,
respectively.
In conclusion, starting with further optimization of the carbox-
ylic acid of the previously reported EP3 antagonist 1, we identified
a series of novel N-acylsulfonamide analogs as more potent and
selective EP3 antagonists. Based on the SAR described above, the
optimized N-acylsulfonamide moieties were considered to play a
role of not only a bioisostere of the carboxylic acid but also another
interaction site through the arylsulfonamide moiety for the EP3
receptor. Among them, the N-(3,4-difluorobenzene)sulfonyl moi-
ety was found to be the most optimized one for the EP3 receptor
antagonist activity. A series of N-acyl 3,4-difluorobenzenesulfona-
mide analogs exhibited potent in vivo efficacy, which was indi-
cated as the inhibitory effect on the PGE2-induced uterine
contraction in pregnant rats. Compounds 16, 25, and 26 exhibited
the more potent in vivo efficacy among those tested.
9. (a) Juteau, H.; Gareau, Y.; Labelle, M.; Sturino, C. F.; Sawyer, N.; Tremblay, N.;
Lamontagne, S.; Carriere, M. C.; Denis, D.; Metters, K. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2001, 9, 1977; (b) Gallant, M.; Carriere, M. C.; Chateauneuf, A.; Denis, D.;
Gareau, Y.; Godbout, C.; Greig, G.; Juteau, H.; Lachance, N.; Lacombe, P.;
Lamontagne, S.; Metters, K. M.; Rochette, C.; Ruel, D.; Slipetz, D.; Sawyer, N.;
Tremblay, N.; Labelle, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 2583; (c) Belley, M.;
Chan, C. C.; Gareau, Y.; Gallant, M.; Juteau, H.; Houde, K.; Lachance, N.; Labelle,
M.; Sawyer, N.; Tremblay, N.; Lamontagne, S.; Carriere, M. C.; Denis, D.; Greig,
G. M.; Slipetz, D.; Gordon, R.; Chauret, N.; Li, C.; Zamboni, R. J.; Metters, K. M.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 5639.
10. (a) Zhou, N.; Zeller, W.; Krohn, M.; Anderson, H.; Zhang, J.; Onua, E.; Kiselyov, A.
S.; Ramirez, J.; Halldorsdottir, G.; Andresson, T.; Gurney, M. E.; Singh, J. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 123; (b) O’Connell, M.; Zeller, W.; Burgeson, J.;
Mishra, R. K.; Ramirez, J.; Kiselyov, A. S.; Andresson, T.; Gurney, M. E.; Singh, J.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 778; (c) Zhou, N.; Zeller, W.; Zhang, J.; Onua,
E.; Kiselyov, A. S.; Ramirez, J.; Palsdottir, G.; Halldorsdottir, G.; Andresson, T.;
Gurney, M. E.; Singh, J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 1528.
11. (a) Zegar, S.; Tokar, C.; Enache, L. A.; Rajagopol, V.; Zeller, W.; O’Connell, M.;
Singh, J.; Muellner, F. W.; Zembower, D. E. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2007, 11, 747;
(b) Singh, J.; Zeller, W.; Zhou, N.; Hategen, G.; Mishra, R.; Polozov, A.; Yu, P.;
Onua, E.; Zhang, J.; Zembower, D.; Kiselyov, A.; Ramirez, J. L.; Sigthorsson, G.;
Bjornsson, J. M.; Thorsteinsdottir, M.; Andresson, T.; Bjarnadottir, M.;
Magnusson, O.; Fabre, J. E.; Stefansson, K.; Gurney, M. E. ACS Chem. Biol.
2009, 4, 115.
12. Asada, M.; Obitsu, T.; Nagase, T.; Tanaka, M.; Yamaura, Y.; Takizawa, H.;
Yoshikawa, K.; Sato, K.; Narita, M.; Ohuchida, S.; Nakai, H.; Toda, M. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 80.
References and notes
1. Minami, T.; Nakano, H.; Kobayashi, T.; Sugimoto, Y.; Ushikubi, F.; Ichikawa, A.;
Narumiya, S.; Ito, S. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2001, 133, 438.
2. Ushikubi, F.; Segi, E.; Sugimoto, Y.; Murata, T.; Matsuoka, T.; Kobayashi, T.;
Hizaki, H.; Tuboi, K.; Katsuyama, M.; Ichikawa, A.; Tanaka, T.; Yoshida, N.;
Narumiya, S. Nature 1998, 395, 281.
3. (a) Senior, J.; Marshall, K.; Sangha, R.; Baxter, G. S.; Clayton, J. K. Br. J. Pharmacol.
1991, 102, 747; (b) Goureau, O.; Tanfin, Z.; Marc, S.; Harbon, S. Am. J. Physiol.
1992, 263, C257.
4. Chen, M. C. Y.; Amirian, D. A.; Toomey, M.; Sanders, M. J.; Soll, A. H.
Gastroenterology 1988, 94, 1121.
13. Evaluation of the binding affinity (Ki values) was carried out in the absence of
BSA, while evaluation of the antagonist activity (IC50 values) was carried out in
the presence of 1% BSA to estimate more exact in vivo potency.
14. More than 95% of homology between the mouse EP3 receptor and the rat EP3
receptor is reported: Neuschafer-Rube, F.; DeVries, C.; Hanecke, K.;
Jungermann, K.; Puschel, G. P. FEBS Lett. 1994, 351, 119.
5. Ma, H.; Hara, A.; Xiao, C. Y.; Okada, Y.; Takahata, O.; Nakaya, K.; Sugimoto, Y.;
Ichikawa, A.; Narumiya, S.; Ushikubi, F. Circulation 2001, 104, 1176.
6. Gross, S.; Tilly, P.; Hentsch, D.; Vonesch, J. L.; Fabre, J. E. J. Exp. Med. 2007, 204,
311.