Herein, we report a new catch and release click linker,
designed to facilitate mild loading and cleavage. We
envisioned that an azide-functionalized resin 5 and alkynyl-
silane-protected substrate 6 would be suitable partners for
this purpose (Scheme 1). The azido-functionalized resin could
readily be obtained from Merrifield resin upon treatment with
sodium azide,18 whereas the proposed ethynyldialkylchlo-
rosilane could in principle function as a silyl protecting
group, with the alkyne handle serving to immobilize the
substrate to the solid phase via CuAAC. The overall design
circumvents the need to introduce the alkyne functionality
just before loading. In addition, the characteristic IR azide
stretch (2100 cm-1) provides a convenient mode to monitor
the progress of resin loading.
Figure 1. Silyl ethers and triazole linkers.
rosilanes9,11,12 and hydrosilylation of resin bound olefins13
followed by the activation of the silyl hydride with triflic
acid,14 trichloroisocyanuric acid,10 or 1,3-dichloro-5,5-dim-
ethylhydantoin13 are widely employed. The target resin-
bound silyl ethers are then formed in situ by loading the
corresponding alcohol.8-10 The given cleavage conditions
depend upon the nature of the substituent but generally
involve fluoride sources or protic reagents.8,13
Scheme 1. “Click” Linker Design
Though a number of versatile silyl linkers are described
in the literature,7 our interest in click chemistry15 and in
particular the CuAAC reaction16 prompted us to design and
develop a complementary linker strategy. Our bifunctional
reagent would comprise a silyl core capable of reversibly
“tagging” a functional group, such as an alcohol and an
orthogonally reactive functional handle such as an alkyne,
ready for “capture” onto a solid phase.
Click chemistry has found previous application in SPS,
with the corresponding triazole “linker” functionality being
ideal due to its robust nature and inertness to a wide range
of conditions. Gmeiner et al. have reported a modified BAL
(Backbone Amide Linker),17 which involved reacting the
azido polystyrene with an appropriately laced alkyne sub-
strate. Cleavage of the amide group was achived by TFA
with loss of the aryl spacer group. The key to the success of
this methodology was the introduction of a suitable terminal
alkyne into the substrates for the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition
(4, Figure 1).
Ethynyldiisopropylchlorosilane (EDIPS-Cl) (7) was chosen
as the first-generation alkynylchlorosilane for our investiga-
tion. Silyl chloride 7 was readily prepared by treating
commercially available chlorodiisopropylsilane 8 with ethy-
nylmagnesium bromide 9,19 affording 10, which upon
treatment with 1,3-dichloro-5,5-dimethylhydantoin (11) gave
target 7 (Scheme 2).13 The chlorination reaction was followed
using IR spectroscopy, which showed disappearance of the
distinctive Si-H stretch at 2100-2200 cm-1.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 7
(11) For example, see: Farrall, M. J.; Frechet, J. M. J. J. Org. Chem.
1976, 41, 3877–3882
.
(12) (a) Schuster, M.; Blechert, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2295–
2298. (b) Schuster, M.; Lucas, N.; Blechert, S. Chem. Commun. 1997, 823–
824
.
(13) Hu, Y.; Porco, J. A.; Labadie, J. W.; Gooding, O. W. J. Org. Chem.
1998, 63, 4518–4521.
(14) (a) Hu, Y.; Porco, J. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3289–3292.
(b) Smith, E. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3285–3288.
Reagent 7 proved a good choice and could be reacted with
the hydroxyl group of several diverse substrates including
secondary, benzylic, and allylic alcohols, to give their
corresponding EDIPS protected silyl ethers 12-17, in good
to excellent yields (Scheme 3). Optimal conditions were
found with DCM as solvent, Et3N as base, and a catalytic
(15) Zhang, F.; Moses, J. E. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1587–1590. (b) Barral,
K.; Moorhouse, A. D.; Moses, J. E. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1809–1811. (c)
Moorhouse, A. D.; Santos, A. M.; Gunaratnam, M.; Moore, M.; Neidle,
S.; Moses, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15972–15973.
(16) (a) Rostovtsev, V. V.; Green, L. G.; Fokin, V. V.; Sharpless, K. B.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2596–2599. (b) Tornoe, C. W.;
Christensen, C.; Medal, M. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3057–3064. (c) Kolb,
H. C.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40,
2004–2021. (d) Huisgen, R. Pure Appl. Chem. 1989, 61, 613–628. (e)
Huisgen, R.; Szeimies, G.; Mobius, L. Chem. Ber. 1967, 100, 2494–2507.
(17) Lo1ber, S.; Rodriguez-Loaiza, P.; Gmeiner, P. Org. Lett. 2003, 5,
1753–1755.
(18) Arseniyadis, S.; Wagner, A.; Mioskowski, C. Tetrahedron Lett.
2002, 43, 9717–9719.
(19) Petit, M.; Chouraqui, G.; Aubert, C.; Malacria, M. Org. Lett. 2003,
5, 2037–2040.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 12, 2010
2861