64
V.T. Kasumov et al. / Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 131 (2010) 59–65
4. Experimental
4.1. Materials
1 mmol) and stirred at ꢅ40 8C for ca. 45 min. Yield 0.284 g, 68%.
mp > 310 8C. Anal. calcd. for C42H46N2O2F6Pd: C, 60.68; H, 5.57;
N, 3.37. Found: C, 60.07; H, 5.48; N, 3.19. FT-IR (KBr, cmꢁ1):
2868–2958 [C(CH3)3], 1600 (CH55N); UV–Vis [EtOH,
(log
)]: 231(4.66), 261(3.74), 304(3.52), 414(3.17). 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): 7.08 (s, 2H, CH55N), 7.555 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 2H,
meta-coupled 4-ArH), 7.315 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 2H, meta-coupled 6-
ArH), 7.11–6.94 (m, 4H, 2,3,4-FPhH), 1.24 [s, 18H, C(CH3)3), 0.9
(s, 18H, C(CH3)3].
lmax/nm
All solvents, sulfuric acid, acetic acid, hexamethylenetetramine,
nitrobenzene, 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol, (NH4)2Ce(NO3)6, 2,3,4-tri-
fluoroaniline and acetates of Cu(II) and Pd(II) were purchased from
Sigma–Aldrich and used without further purification. The reagent
3,5-di-tert-butylsalicylaldehyde was prepared according to the
literature procedure [28].
e
d
4.4. X-ray structural determination of 2
4.2. Instrumentation
A suitable single crystal of complex 2 was mounted on a glass
The C, H, N elemental analyses were performed on a LECO
CHNS-932 model analyzer. Electronic spectra were recorded by
using a PerkinElmer Lambda 25 spectrometer, IR spectra obtained
on a PerkinElmer FT-IR spectrometer using KBr pellet. 1H NMR
spectra were recorded on a Bruker Spectro spin Avance DPX-400
Ultra Shield Model NMR with Me4Si as an internal standard in
CDCl3. The room temperature magnetic susceptibility was
measured by using a Sherwood Scientific magnetic balance and
the diamagnetic corrections were evaluated using Pascal’s con-
fiber and data collection were performed on a STOE IPDS(II) image
˚
plate detector using Mo Ka radiation (l = 0.71019 A) at 298 K. Data
collection: Stoe X-AREA [29]. Cell refinement: Stoe X-AREA [29].
Data reduction: Stoe X-RED [29]. The structure was solved by
direct methods using SHELXS-97 [30] and anisotropic displace-
ment parameters were applied to non-hydrogen atoms in a full-
matrix least-squares refinement based on F2 using SHELXL-97 [30].
All hydrogen atoms except H7 and H28 were positioned
geometrically and refined by a riding model with Uiso 1.2 times
that of attached atoms and remaining hydrogen atoms were found
by Fourier difference. Molecular drawings were obtained using
ORTEP-III [31].
stant. ESR spectra were taken on
a Varian E109C X-band
spectrometer. The field and frequency calibration were made
using DPPH (g = 2.0037).
4.3. Synthesis
Acknowledgment
4.3.1. N-2,3,4-trifluorophenyl-3,5-di-tert-butylsalicylaldimine (1)
Ligand 1 was prepared using standard procedures involving the
We are grateful to the Harran University Research Council for
¨
Grant under HUBAK-712.
condensation
of
3,5-di-tert-butyl-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde
(0.936 g, 4 mmol) with 2,3,4-fluoroaniline (0.588 g, 4 mmol) in
absolute ethanol (100 ml) in the presence of a few drops of formic
acid. The mixture was stirred at reflux for 36 h and then
concentrated to ꢅ40 ml. By slow cooling of the reaction mixture
to room temperature, a light yellow crystal of 1 was obtained. Yield
1.277 g, 88%. mp = 102 8C. IR (KBr, cmꢁ1): 1625 (CH55N), 2866–
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for the
structure in this paper have been deposited with the Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre as the supplementary publication no.
CCDC 718000 for 2. These data can be obtained free of charge on
application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge, CB12 1EZ, UK, fax:
2957 [C(CH3)3]; UV/Visible [EtOH,
lmax/nm (log e)]: 225(4.47),
234(sh), 282(4.5), 322(sh), 360(4.1). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3),
d
:
13.18 (s, 1H, OH), 8.88 (s, 1H, CH55N), 7.537 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H, meta-
coupled 4-ArH), 7.255 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H, meta-coupled 6-ArH),
7.018 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H, 2,3,4-F-Ph C6-H), 7.049 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H,
2,3,4-FPh C5-H), 1.51 (s, 9H), 1.367 (s, 9H). Anal. calcd. for
References
C
4.18.
21H24NOF3: C, 73.02; H, 7.29; N, 4.05. Found: C, 72.74; H, 7.29; N,
[1] R.H. Holm, M.J. O’Connor, Prog. Inorg. Chem. 14 (1971) 241–401.
[2] A.D. Garnovski, A.P. Sadimenko, M.C. Sadimenko, D.A. Garnovski, Coord. Chem.
Rev. 173 (1998) 31–77.
[3] P. Chaudhuri, K. Wieghardt, Prog. Inorg. Chem. 50 (2001) 151–216.
[4] A.A. Medjidov, V.T. Kasumov, H.S. Mamedov, Koord. Khim. 7 (1981) 66–71.
[5] A.A. Medjidov, V.T. Kasumov, M.K. Guseyinova, H.S. Mamedov, V.S. Aliev, Dokl. AN
USSR 259 (1981) 866–869.
[6] V.T. Kasumov, A.A. Medjidov, Koord. Khim. 15 (1989) 1404–1407.
[7] I.J. Rehle, T.F. Markle, H. Nagao, A.G. DiPasquale, O.P. Lam, M.A. Lockwood, K. Rotter,
J.M. Mayer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 (2006) 6075–6088, and references therein.
[8] V.T. Kasumov, F. Ko¨ksal, R. Ko¨seoglu, J. Coord. Chem. 57 (2004) 591–603.
[9] V.T. Kasumov, F. Ko¨ksal, Y. Zeren, Spectrochim. Acta Part A 63 (2006) 330–336.
[10] V.T. Kasumov, F. Ko¨ksal, A. Sezer, Polyhedron 24 (2005) 1203–1211.
4.3.2. Copper bis{2-[(2,3,4-Trifluorophenylimino)methyl-3,5-di-tert-
butylphenolato]} (2)
Complex 2 was prepared by addition of 5 ml methanol solution
of Cu(OAc)2xH2O (0.1 g, 0.5 mmol) to a hot solution of MeOH
(60 ml) containing 1 (0.364 g, 1.0 mmol). The reaction mixture was
refluxed with stirring for ca. 60 min. Then the volume of solution
was reduced to ꢅ30 ml and kept in air at r.t. After one day the dark
green crystals were obtained.
Crystals of 2 suitable for an X-ray crystal structure determina-
tion were grown from a saturated solution of methanol at r.t. Yield
0.295 g, 74.7%. mp > 270 8C. FT-IR (KBr, cmꢁ1): 2868–2952
[C(CH3)], 1612 (CH55N), 3429 (OH, lattice H2O)]. UV–Vis (CHCl3,
¨
[11] V.T. Kasumov, E. Tas¸ , F. Ko¨ksal, S¸. Ozalp-Yaman, Polyhedron 24 (2005) 319–
325.
[12] H. Makio, N. Kashiwa, F. Fujita, Adv. Synth. Catal. 344 (2002) 477–493.
[13] A.F. Mason, J. Tian, P.D. Hustad, E.B. Lobkovsky, G.W. Coates, Isr. J. Chem. 42 (2002)
301–306.
[14] R. Furuyama, J. Saito, S. Ishii, H. Makio, M. Mitani, H. Tanaka, T. Fujita, J.
Organomet. Chem. 690 (2005) 4398–4413.
[15] T. Matsugi, T. Fujita, Chem. Soc. Rev. 37 (2008) 1264–1277.
[16] K. Kawai, T. Fujita, Top. Organomet. Chem. 26 (2009) 3–46.
[17] D.L. Chizhov, D.V. Sevenard, E. Lork, K.I. Pashkevich, G.V. Ro¨schenthaler, J. Fluorine
Chem. 123 (2004) 1137–1141.
l
m
max/nm (log
e): 250(sh), 292(4.82), 337(sh), 415(4.29), 665(2.31),
eff = 1.83 B. Anal. calcd. for C42H46N2O2F6Cu: C, 67.08; H, 6.43; N,
m
3.72; Found: C, 66.81; H, 6.73; N, 3.08.
[18] S. Yamada, Coord. Chem. Rev. 190–192 (1999) 537–555.
[19] A. Bondi, J. Phys. Chem. 68 (1964) 441–451.
[20] M.D. Cohen, G.M.J. Schmidt, J. Phys. Chem. 66 (1962) 2442–2446.
[21] Y.I. Koslov, D.N. Shigorin, R.N. Nurmukametov, V.A. Puchkov, Russ. J. Phys. Chem.
37 (1963) 1315–1319.
4.3.3. Palladium bis{2-[(2,3,4-Trifluorophenylimino)methyl-3,5-di-
tert-butylphenolato]} (3)
Complex 3 was prepared by direct addition of Pd(OAc)2
(0.112 g, 0.5 mmol) to 30 ml hot CH3CN solution of 1 (0.363 g,