Rozhkov and Larock
JOCArticle
iodide 7, led to only a trace amount of the desired annulation
product 9 and virtually all starting materials were recovered.
This is most likely due to the slower oxidative addition of
carbon-chlorine and carbon-bromine bonds to the Pd(0)
complex generated in situ.
The use of o-iodophenyl acetate and trans,trans-2,4-hex-
adiene gives exclusively the trans-dihydrobenzofuran 10 in
75% yield (Table 1, entry 3). The stereospecificity of this
annulation is presumably due to coordination of the pheno-
lic oxygen to the palladium center in the π-allylpalladium
intermediate (see the later mechanistic discussion).
Unfortunately, the latter annulation appears limited
to relatively unhindered 1,3-dienes and electron-deficient
o-iodophenols and only one example of this process utilizing
an electron-rich arene has been previously reported.12 Thus,
the reaction of 3 and 1,3-cyclohexadiene only affords a 44%
yield of the corresponding dihydrobenzofuran 6. Annula-
tions with electron-rich 2-iodo-4-methoxyphenol afforded
mainly dehalogenated products and only negligible amounts
of the desired dihydrobenzofurans.13 Our recent success in
the synthesis of dihydrofurocoumarins14 and dihydrofuro-
flavonoids15 by the palladium-catalyzed annulation of 1,3-
dienes using o-iodoacetoxycoumarins and o-iodoacetoxyfla-
vonoids respectively prompted further exploration of the
utility of this methodology for the synthesis of dihydroben-
zofurans. The major objective of this project was the devel-
opment of a general annulation methodology, which could
be successfully applied not only to a certain specific class of
substrates, such as coumarins and flavonoids, but might uti-
lize a broad range of o-iodoaryl acetates. We now wish to
report such success.
Next, a wide variety of electron-rich and electron-defi-
cient aryl iodides were studied. Annulation with termi-
nal, internal, and cyclic dienes and the electron-deficient
substrate 11 gave the desired annulation products 12-15
in excellent yields (Table 1, entries 4-7). We have also
compared our optimized acetate reaction conditions here
with those for aryl iodide 11 and the procedure used in our
earlier research employing o-iodophenols (Table 1, entry
4).12 Annulation of 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene by methyl
4-hydroxy-3-iodobenzoate under our recently developed
and previously reported reaction conditions afforded 70%
and 52% yields of the desired product 12, respectively.
Although the difference in yields is less dramatic compared
to that of the electron-rich substrate 7 (Table 1, entry 2),
our “optimal” reaction conditions have provided a quan-
titative yield of the annulation product 12. The annulations
of 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene by the electron-deficient
substrates 16 and 18 have also given the desired dihydro-
benzofrans 17 and 19 in 88% and 98% yields, respectively
(Table 1, entries 8 and 9). Although the acetate of the nitro-
substituted aryl halide 20 could not be prepared due to its
high propensity to hydrolyze, the annulation of 2,3-di-
methyl-1,3-butadiene by the corresponding phenol gave
the desired dihydrobenzofuran 21 in 72% yield (Table 1,
entry 10). Thus, one can employ the phenol itself and get
good yields of the corresponding dihydrobenzofuran if
there is a strong electron-withdrawing group present on
the phenol ring.
Since electron-rich aryl iodides failed to undergo annula-
tion in our previous studies,12,13 we examined the effective-
ness of our new methodology on substrates 22, 25, 27, and 29.
The annulation of 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene by aryl iodide
22 gave the desired annulation product 23 in 58% yield
(Table 1, entry 11). Surprisingly, employing 1-phenyl-1,3-
butadiene led to formation of the Heck product 24 in a 64%
yield (Table 1, entry 12). When using aryl iodide 22, the 1,3-
dienes 1,3-cyclohexadiene and trans,trans-2,4-hexadiene
gave inseparable, complex mixtures of what appeared to be
Heck-type products. This could be due to slower hydrolysis
of the acetyl group in the case of electron-rich phenols,
leading to β-hydride elimination of the π-allylpalladium
intermediate instead of cyclization.
We have studied the scope and limitations of the palladium-
catalyzed annulation of 1,3-dienes by various o-iodoaryl
acetates (eq 4) under our previous reaction conditions and
our newly developed reaction conditions (Table 1).14,15
The annulation of 1,3-cyclohexadiene by aryl iodide
7 gave the desired annulation product 8 in a 72% yield under
our newly developed reaction conditions (entry 1, see foot-
note a of Table 1 for the new procedure), compared to the
44% yield achieved previously.12 The use of 2,3-dimethyl-
1,3-butadiene gave an even higher 92% yield of dihydroben-
zofuran 9 (Table 1, entry 2). The same annulation carried out
with o-iodophenol, instead of o-iodophenyl acetate, gave
lower 48% yield. The yield of dihydrobenzofuran 9 obtained
with our previously reported reaction conditions for o-iodo-
phenol12 was only 18% and the dehalogenated phenol was
isolated in 70% yield as a major side product. These results
clearly demonstrate the superiority of our new “optimal”
acetate reaction conditions over our previously reported
procedure.
At this point, we examined the necessity of employing an
acetyl group and compared our optimal acetate reaction con-
ditions to our previously reported results using o-iodophe-
nol.12 Employing a methyl, benzyl, pivaloyl, or benzoyl
group on the phenolic oxygen of o-iodophenol in the reaction
with 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene did not lead to any signifi-
cant amount of dihydrobenzofuran 9, presumably due to a
slower rate of hydrolysis compared to the acetyl group. The
use of o-chloro- and o-bromophenyl acetates, instead of aryl
The increased steric hindrance in substrate 25 seems to
have little effect on the yield of dihydrobenzofuran 26
(Table 1, entry 13). Remarkably, the remote acetyl group
in the bis-acylated 4-iodoresorcinol 27 was not cleaved
during the course of the reaction with 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-
butadiene, giving annulated product 28 in a 40% yield
(Table 1, entry 14). The annulation of the sterically hindered
naphthalene 29 gave the desired product 30 in a 48% yield
(Table 1, entry 15).
(10) Larock, R. C.; Guo, L. Synlett 1995, 465.
(11) Gagnier, S. V.; Larock, R. C. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1525.
~
(12) Larock, R. C.; Berrios-Pena, N.; Narayanan, K. J. Org. Chem. 1990,
55, 3447.
~
(13) Berrios-Pena, N.; Larock, R. C. Unpublished results.
(14) (a) Rozhkov, R. V.; Larock, R. C. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 797.
(b) Rozhkov, R. V.; Larock, R. C. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 6314.
(15) (a) Rozhkov, R. V.; Larock, R. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 911.
(b) Rozhkov, R. V.; Larock, R. C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005, 346, 1854.
4132 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 12, 2010