After extensive research by Denmark et al., the potential of
organosilanols to cross couple under base activation was
realized and subsequently exploited to great effect.6 Since
these fundamental discoveries, a variety of masked silanols
have been developed offering the advantage of increased
stability relative to the silanol, thus providing the potential
to modify and carry the silyl species through multiple steps.7
It was anticipated that development of pentafluorophe-
nyldimethylvinylsilanes as masked silanols would allow for
further elaboration prior to cross coupling and/or their direct
application in the selective synthesis of all possible geometric
isomers of disubstituted alkenes.8 We envisaged that such
methodology would prove to be a valuable advance with
potential applications in both target- and diversity-oriented
synthesis.
Table 1. Hydrosilylation of Terminal Alkynes (2) Using
Pentafluorophenyldimethylsilane (1)
Early attempts by Brennan and Gilman to develop the
hydrosilylation of terminal alkynes with pentafluorophe-
nyldimethylsilane (1) suffered from poor regioselectivity,
with mixtures of R- and ꢀ-vinylsilanes being produced when
H2PtCl6 was employed as the catalyst.9 Advances in the Pt-
catalyzed hydrosilylation of terminal alkynes has led to the
exclusive synthesis of (E)-ꢀ-vinylsilanes with a variety of
silanes, when the organically soluble (tBu3P)Pt(DVDS)
complex was used.10,7h Application of the Pt complex to the
hydrosilylation of terminal alkynes with silane 1 resulted in
excellent selectivity: only the (E)-isomer was observed by
1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture (Table 1,
entries 1, 4, 6, and 8). Significantly, further modification of
the vinylsilane (3) was possible prior to cross coupling,
building upon the diversity (Table 1, entry 10).
Historically, generation of the (Z)-ꢀ-vinylsilanes by ste-
reoselective hydrosilylation of terminal alkynes has proven
to be a more complex and difficult task than formation of
the corresponding thermodynamically favored (E)-ꢀ-vinyl-
silanes.3 Accordingly, the synthesis of 3-(Z) was more
challenging. Rh-, Ir- and Ru-based catalysts were all
explored. The Ru complex, RuHCl(CO)(PCy3), developed
a Reaction conditions: (A) silane (1 equiv), alkyne (1.1 equiv),
(tBu3P)Pt(DVDS) (0.1 mol %), toluene, 0 °C to rt; (B) silane (1 equiv),
alkyne (1 equiv), RhHCl(CO)(PCy3)2 (5 mol %), DCM, rt; (C) silane (1.05
equiv), alkyne (1 equiv), [Cp*Ru(MeCN)3]PF6 (1 mol %), DCM, 0 °C to
rt; (D) (i) silane (1 equiv), propargyl amine (1 equiv), (tBu3P)Pt(DVDS)
(0.1 mol %), toluene, 0 °C to rt, (ii) benzoyl chloride (1.2 equiv),
triethylamine (1.2 equiv), THF, 0 °C. b Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy
c Isolated yield. d 10 mol % catalyst used.
(5) (a) Denmark, S. E. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 2915. (b) Denmark,
S. E.; Baird, J. D. Chem.sEur. J. 2006, 12, 4954
.
(6) (a) Denmark, S. E.; Regens, C. S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1486.
(b) Denmark, S. E.; Sweis, R. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 835. (c) Denmark,
S. E.; Sweis, R. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6439.
(7) Examples of masked silanols: (a) Denmark, S. E.; Wehrli, D.; Choi,
J. Y. Org. Lett. 2000, 2491. (b) Denmark, S. E. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74,
2915. (c) Denmark, S. E.; Baird, J. D. Chem.sEur. J. 2006, 12, 4954. (d)
Denmark, S. E.; Choi, J. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5821. (e) Sore,
H. F.; Boehner, C. M.; MacDonald, S. J. F.; Norton, D.; Fox, D. J.; Spring,
D. R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 1068. (f) Prukala, W. Synlett 2008, 19,
3026. (g) Denmark, S. E.; Butler, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 3690.
(h) Denmark, S. E.; Wang, Z. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1073. (i) Anderson, J. C.;
Munday, R. H. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 8971. (j) Anderson, J. C.; Anguille,
S.; Bailey, R. Chem. Commun. 2002, 18, 2018. (k) Denmark, S. E.; Liu,
J. H.-C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3737. (l) Trost, B. M.; Machacek,
M. R.; Ball, Z. T. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1895. (m) Itami, K.; Mitsudo, K.;
Nokami, T.; Kamei, T.; Koike, T.; Yoshida, J.-i. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002,
653, 105. (n) Itami, K.; Nokami, T.; Yoshida, J.-I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 5600. (o) Hosoi, K.; Nozaki, K.; Hiyama, T. Chem. Lett. 2002, 31,
138.
by Ozawa,11 was the most promising, producing 3-(Z) with
reasonable selectivity and in a modest yield (Table 1, entry
2). Alternative strategies were investigated for the exclusive
synthesis of the (Z)-isomer.
Markovnikov addition of silanes across terminal al-
kynes has been achieved with excellent regioselectivity
using the cationic cyclopentadienylruthenium complex,
[Cp*Ru(MeCN)3]PF6.12 Pleasingly, treatment of silane 1
with a range of terminal alkynes produced the R-isomer
exclusively, when catalyzed by the Ru complex (Table 1,
entries 3, 5, and 7). Interestingly, in order to drive the reaction
(8) It was anticipated that the lower pKa (pentafluorobenzene pKa ) 25)
of the pentafluorophenyl group relative to existing “masked silanols” would
faciliate its deprotection and subsequent participation in the regio- and
stereoselective cross coupling under mild conditions.
(11) Ozawa, F.; Katayama, H.; Taniguchi, K.; Kobayashi, M.; Sagawa,
T.; Minami, T. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 645, 192.
(9) Brennan, T.; Gilman, H. J. Organomet. Chem. 1969, 16, 63.
(10) Chandra, G.; Lo, P. Y.; Hitchcock, P. B.; Lappert, M. F. Organo-
(12) (a) Trost, B. M.; Ball, Z. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 17644.
(b) Trost, B. M.; Ball, Z. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12726.
metallics 1987, 6, 191
.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 12, 2010
2807