Table 1. [Rh((R,R)-R-SMS-Phos)(MeOH)2]BF4-Catalyzed Hydrogenation of S1-S7a
a The catalyst was prepared in situ from [Rh(nbd)2]BF4. Runs were carried out under 1 bar of H2 (10 bar for S7) at rt in MeOH (0.5 mmol of substrate
in 7.5 mL of MeOH) with a substrate/catalyst ratio (S/C) ) 100 (S/C ) 1000 for S1) for the time indicated (100% conversion) if not stated otherwise and
are unoptimized. Typical isolated yields were >90%. Ee’s were determined by chiral GC (prior to analysis, the carboxylic group of the hydrogenation
product of S7 was esterified with TMSCHN2). With (R,R)-R-SMS-Phos, S-configured products were obtained except with S6. b 92% conversion. c 77%
conversion. d In the presence of Et3N (1.1 equiv). e 53% conversion.
1,2-bis[(o-hydroxyphenyl)(phenyl)phosphino-P-borane]-
ethane,3a the R-SMS-Phos series was assessed under mild
conditions in the asymmetric hydrogenation of an indicative
set of olefinic substrates S1-S7 (Table 1). The Rh(I)-(R-
SMS-Phos)-catalyzed hydrogenation proved to be affected
by the cyclic nature and structure of the R groups. The cPen-
and Cy-SMS-Phos ligands emerged as being superior,
whereas Ph-SMS-Phos presented the lowest ee values
followed by Bn-SMS-Phos. Interestingly, the latter’s per-
fluorinated-ring analogue C6F5CH2-SMS-Phos behaved in
comparison to it noticeably better. Consequently, in the case
of the Bn-SMS-Phos ligand, a deleterious interference of a
Bn group with the Rh center appears to be attributable.
oselectivity attained in such catalysis for the corresponding
benchmark substrate.3
Investigating further the scope of the Rh(I)-(Cy-SMS-
Phos) catalyst in hydrogenation, this was screened under mild
conditions against a selection of a broad diversity of
challenging and new olefins S7-S24 (Table 2). Bn-
substituted olefins (S9, S19, and S24) were considered as
well. Overall, high reaction rates coupled with good to
excellent ee’s were obtained ranking among the top values
reported in the literature for the hydrogenation of the
corresponding substrates.5
Under the adopted standard reaction conditions, the Rh(I)-
(Cy-SMS-Phos) complex was effective in catalyzing the
hydrogenation of a series of ꢀ-substituted and ꢀ,ꢀ-disubsti-
tuted dehydro-(N-acetyl)alaninates S8-S12 with >99% ee
and good reaction rates. In particular, methyl (Z)-2-aceta-
mido-3-(3-pyridyl)propenoate (S8) in the form of its HBF4
salt was hydrogenated with 99.6% ee within 24 h using a
S/C 30 000. With comparable efficiency, ethyl R-acetamido-
vinylphosphonate (S13) led to 99.9% ee within a few hours
Thus, operating with a S/C 100 in MeOH at rt under 1
bar of H2, the classical test substrates methyl R-acetamido-
acrylate (S1: MAA) and cinnamate (S2: MAC) were
hydrogenated invariably with >99% ee’s within minutes,
except for Ph-SMS-Phos which afforded ee’s up to 97.1%.
The Cy-SMS-Phos performed the best in the hydrogenation
of methyl (Z)-3-acetamidobut-2-enoate (S3: (Z)-MAB) and
its (E)-isomer (S4: (E)-MAB) attaining 88.2% and 97.8%
ee, respectively. R-Acetamidostyrene (S5: AS) and dimethyl
itaconate (S6: DMI) were hydrogenated within minutes with
>99% ee using cPen- or Cy-SMS-Phos, and the performance
of C6F5CH2-SMS-Phos was quite close. Notably, the hydro-
genation of atropic acid (S7: AA) using cPen- and Cy-SMS-
Phos proceeded within 2 h leading to 96.4% and 97.1% ee,
respectively. The latter result represents the highest enanti-
(4) Juge´, S.; Stephan, M.; Laffitte, J. A.; Geneˆt, J.-P. Tetrahedron Lett.
1990, 31, 6357–6360.
(5) For indicative literature data regarding metal-catalyzed hydrogenation
of the known substrates or derivatives with representative phosphorus-based
ligands, see the Supporting Information.
(6) (a) Talley, J. J. US5321153, 1994. (b) Breipohl, G.; Holla, W.;
Jendralla, H.; Beck, G. WO55175, 2001. (c) Zeng, Q.; Liu, H.; Mi, A.;
Jiang, Y.; Li, X.; Choi, M. C. K.; Chan, A. S. C. Tetrahedron 2002, 58,
8799–8803. (d) Blaser, H.-U.; Pugin, B.; Spindler, F. J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem. 2005, 231, 1–20.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 13, 2010
3023