Scheme 2. Arylation/Cyclization Cascade Reactions of Propargylic Ethers 3
a Reaction was performed under optimized conditions reported in Table 2.
Furthermore, using triphenylphosphine as an additive led
to the formation of 2a in 78% yield (entry 10). Employment
of bromo-benzene under these conditions proved to be less
efficient producing indolizine 2a in 29% yield only (entry
11).
Next, under the optimized conditions, the scope of this
cascade cyclization was examined (Table 2). Thus, acetyloxy
and pivalyloxy-propargylic esters possessing alkyl (entries
1-7), aryl (entries 8 and 9), or alkenyl (entry 10) substituents
at the triple bond underwent smooth conversion to give the
corresponding heterocycles 2a-j in good to excellent yields.
To provide a handle for further functonalization, pivalates
were chosen over acetates due to their greater potential to
participate in Suzuki-Miyaura10 and Kumada5e coupling
reactions.
bromobenzenes performed equally well in this process
(4a-c). Similarly, the cascade cyclization of propargylic
silylether 3 gave the corresponding indolizine 4e in 73%
yield.
Presumably, this palladium-catalyzed arylation/cycliza-
tion reaction proceeds through a coordination of the triple
bond of an alkyne 1 with ArPdX, triggering the 5-endo-
dig cyclization by the nucleophilic attack of the pyridyl
nitrogen, leading to the formation of zwitterionic adduct
5 (Scheme 3). The latter, upon deprotonation/tautomer-
Scheme 3. Proposed Mechanism
The generality of this process was expanded by utiliza-
tion of a variety of functionalized iodobenzenes which
uneventfully cyclized into the corresponding indolizines
2k-p (entries 11-16). Notably, this reaction proceeded
equally efficiently with other heterocyclic cores; quinoline
and isoquinoline propargylic esters were successfully
utilized in this transformation providing access to tricyclic
cores 2q-t in a highly efficient manner (entries 17-20).
It was also found that propargylic phenylethers 3 could
be employed in this transformation (Scheme 2). Interestingly,
(5) (a) Kel’in, A. V.; Sromek, A. W.; Gevorgyan, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 2074. (b) Smith, C. R.; Bunnelle, E. M.; Rhodes, A. J.; Sarpong,
R. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1169. (c) Hardin, A. R.; Sarpong, R. Org. Lett. 2007,
9, 4547. (d) Yan, B.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, H.; Chen, J.; Liu, Y. J. Org. Chem.
2007, 72, 7783. (e) Schwier, T.; Sromek, A. W.; Yap, D. M. L.; Chernyak,
D.; Gevorgyan, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9868. For a catalyst-free
approach toward indolizines, see: (f) Chernyak, D.; Gadamsetty, S. B.;
Gevorgyan, V. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 2307. (g) Kim, I.; Choi, J.; Won, H. K.;
Lee, G. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 6863. (h) Kim, I.; Won, H. K.;
Choi, J.; Lee, G. H. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 12954. (i) Kim, I.; Kim, S. G.;
Kim, J. Y.; Lee, G. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 8976.
(6) Seregin, I. V.; Schammel, A. W.; Gevorgyan, V. Org. Lett. 2007, 9,
3433.
ization and subsequent reductive elimination,11 would give
product 2.
In summary, we have developed a practical and efficient
two-component coupling method toward fully substituted
fused pyrroloheterocycles, including indolizines, pyrrolo-
quinolines, and pyrroloisoquinolines. This method is comple-
(7) Seregin, I. V.; Gevorgyan, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12050.
(8) When this manuscript was in preparation, a related report on synthesis
of the indolizinone core appeared: Kim, I.; Kim, K. Org. Lett. 2010, 12,
2500.
(9) See Supporting Informationfor a detailed preparative procedure.
(10) Quasdorf, K. W.; Tian, X.; Garg, N. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 14422.
(11) (a) Zeni, G.; Larock, R. C. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 2285. (b) Cacchi,
S.; Fabrizi, G. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 2873. (c) Zeni, G.; Larock, R. C.
Chem. ReV. 2006, 106, 4644.
3244
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 14, 2010