The 1H NMR data and the specific rotation of 9 so
obtained differed from those reported by in the literature,
for which we have no explanation at the present time;
however, the CD spectrum of 9 bore a strong resemblance
to that reported previously. The possibility that we might
have accessed a different rotamer of 9 about the Phe-Pro
bond was addressed through VT-NMR experiments.
Heating of 9 in DMF-d7 above the coalescence temperature
Scheme 6. Synthesis of Cyclc Hexapeptide 14
1
followed by cooling to room temperature returned an H
NMR spectrum identical to the one obtained before
heating, thereby ruling out the possibility that the cy-
clization had afforded a metastable conformer. Suspecting
that the C-terminal proline residue had undergone epimer-
ization in the course of the synthesis, an isomeric seco-
hexapeptide thioacid, in which the original L-proline was
replaced by D-proline, was prepared and cyclized. Interest-
ingly, in this epimeric series the cyclization took place
with a somewhat higher yield, thereby emphasizing the
dependence of the cyclization yield on the configuration
and conformation of the backbone (Scheme 4). However,
after final hydrogenolysis an isomer 11 of the targeted
sequence was obtained whose spectral data were clearly
different from those of its L-prolinyl isomer and those
reported in the literature for 9. While this experiment does
not explain the differences between the data for 9 obtained
in our lab and that reported in the literature, it does serve
nicely to highlight the essentially racemization-free nature
of the chemistry reported here.
obtained in 36% yield along with 12% of the cyclic dimer
13 (Scheme 5). Interestingly, the H NMR spectrum of
1
12 displayed two sets of signals in an approximate 2:1
ratio at 25 °C, and 10 amide carbonyl carbon resonances
were visible in the 13C NMR spectrum under the same
conditions, indicating the possibility of two distinct
conformers for this cyclic peptide. VT-NMR experiments
confirmed this hypothesis, with coalescence of the signals
into a single set at 100 °C (Supporting Information).
The second disconnection investigated, which relied on
cyclization with the formation of a peptide bond between
the phenylalaninyl and prolyl residues and which employed
an N-toluenesulfonyl protected arginine residue in place of
the Pbf group of the first sequence, took place with a
significantly improved yield of 49% (Scheme 6).
The cyclization of a tetrapeptide was also briefly inves-
tigated. Unfortunately, we were only able to isolate the cyclic
dimer 15 from this sequence (Scheme 7).
With a view to testing the scope of the method, and
especially the functional group compatibility, two pro-
tected versions 12 and 14 of a further cyclic hexapeptide,
of interest because of its ability to mimic structurally and
functionally the human natural killer cell-1 (HNK-1)
epitope,12 were constructed by two different cyclizations
as outlined in Schemes 5 and 6. In the first of these two
approaches (Scheme 5) cyclization was attempted with
Scheme 7. Attempted Synthesis of a Cyclic Tetrapeptide
Scheme 5. Synthesis of Cyclic Hexapeptide 12
Finally, we have investigated briefly a convergent
sequence for substituted cyclic peptide preparation. To
this end the tetrapeptide 17 was constructed by Boc
chemistry solution phase peptide synthesis (Supporting
Information) starting from the bis(thioester) 16 of aspartic
acid according to the standard protocol. It is especially
noteworthy that the two thioester groups of the C-terminal
aspartate residue were successfully carried through this
sequence of reactions.
Treatment of the tetrapeptide bis(thioester) 17 with
trifluoroacetic acid and triethylsilane in dichloromethane
at room temperature gave, by analogy with an earlier,
formation of the peptide bond between the serine and
arginine residues, with the side chain of the latter pro-
tected in the form of a pentamethyldihydrobenzofuranyl-
sulfonamide (Pbf) group. The target compound 12 was
(12) (a) Bhunia, A.; Vivekanandan, S.; Eckert, T.; Burg-Roderfeld, M.;
Wechselberger, R.; Romanuka, J.; Ba¨chle, D.; Kornilov, A. V.; von der
Lieth, C.-W.; Jime´nez-Barbero, J.; Nifantiev, N. E.; Schachner, M.; Sewald,
N.; Lu¨tteke, T.; Siebert, H.-C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 96–105. (b)
Ba¨chle, D.; Loers, G.; Gutho¨hrlein, E. W.; Schachner, M.; Sewald, N.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6582–6585.
(11) Veber, D. F.; Freidinger, R. M.; Perlow, D. S.; Paleveda, W. J.;
Holly, F. W.; Strachan, R. G.; Nutt, R. F.; Arison, B. H.; Homnick, C.;
Randall, W. C.; Glitzer, M. S.; Saperstein, R.; Hirschmann, R. Nature 1981,
292, 55–58.
(13) Crich, D.; Sasaki, K.; Rahaman, M. Y.; Bowers, A. A. J. Org.
Chem. 2009, 74, 3886–3894.
3256
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 14, 2010