pubs.acs.org/joc
SCHEME 1. Cu-Catalyzed Carbon-Selenium Bond Formation
Al2O3-Supported Cu-Catalyzed Electrophilic
Substitution by PhSeBr in Organoboranes,
Organosilanes, and Organostannanes. A Protocol for
the Synthesis of Unsymmetrical Diaryl and Alkyl
Aryl Selenides
Sukalyan Bhadra, Amit Saha, and Brindaban C. Ranu*
Department of Organic Chemistry, Indian Association for the
Cultivation of Science, Jadavpur, Kolkata-700032, India
Received April 19, 2010
or aryl boronic acids under oxygen atmosphere (oxidative
coupling)4 in the presence of a transition metal catalyst.
Another is the electrophilic substitution by ArSeþ (ArSeX,
ArSeCN) in stronger nucleophiles such as aryl lithium, aryl
Grignard reagent, or aryl mercurals.5 However electrophilic
substitution by ArSeþ in milder nucleophiles like aryl boro-
nic acids, aryl siloxanes, and aryl stannanes is rare. Only one
such reaction of phenylselenyl chloride and vinyl boronic
acid/ester in the presence of ionic liquid has been reported by
Kabalka et al.6 Thus, we considered it interesting to investi-
gate electrophilic substitution by PhSeþ in readily available
milder nucleophilic reagents using a simple catalyst. This led
us to report here a general reaction of phenylselenium bro-
mide with aryl, alkyl, or heteroaryl boronic acids/siloxanes/
stannanes using our recently developed heterogeneous
alumina-supported copper(II) catalyst7 (Scheme 1). This
catalyst is very easy to prepare, inexpensive, and environ-
mentally friendly.
To optimize the reaction conditions the coupling of phe-
nylselenyl bromide with phenyl boronic acid/phenyl trimeth-
oxysilane/phenyl tributylstannane using different solvents
and base at varied temperatures in the presence of Cu/Al2O3
was studied. The best result was obtained by using 4 mol %
of Cu/Al2O3 catalyst and K2CO3 in THF (Table 1, entries 5,
10, and 13). In the absence of catalyst (Table 1, entries 6, 11,
and 14) the reaction did not proceed at all in the case of
siloxane and stannane and occurred marginally (15%) with
phenyl boronic acid. The reactions with either Al2O3 or
Alumina-supported copper sulfate efficiently catalyzes
electrophilic substitution in organoborane, organosi-
lanes, and organostannanes by phenylselenium bromide
providing a novel and efficient route to the synthesis of
unsymmetrical diaryl and alkyl aryl selenides. A series of
aryl, alkyl, and heteroaryl phenyl selenides were obtained
in high yields. The catalyst is inexpensive, eco- and user-
friendly, and recyclable. The mechanism involving Cu-
assisted nucleophilic displacement of Br in PhSeBr by
mild nucleophiles is described.
The phenylselenylation is a useful process in organic syn-
thesis as selenium compounds are of much potential as
anticancer and antioxidant agents.1 The existing methods
for the synthesis of aryl selenides are based on primarily two
types of reactions. The most common one is the nucleophilic
addition of ArSe- to aryl halides2 or aryl diazonium salts3
(1) (a) Shine, H. In Organic Selenium Compounds: Their Chemistry and
Biology; Klayman, D. L. J., Gunther, W. H. H., Eds.; Wiley-Interscience:
New York, 1973; pp 941-962. (b) Castla, L.; Perkins, M. J. In The Chemistry
of Organic Selenium and Tellurium Compounds; Patai, S., Ed.; John Wiley and
Sons: New York, 1987; Vol. 2, pp 657-673. (c) Weng, X.; Ren, L.; Weng, L.;
Huang, J.; Zhu, S.; Zhou, X.; Weng, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8020–
8023.
(2) (a) Cristan, H. J.; Chabaud, B.; Labaudiniere, R.; Christol, H.
Organometallics 1985, 4, 657–661. (b) Millois, C.; Diaz, P. Org. Lett. 2000,
2, 1705–1708. (c) Taniguchi, N.; Onami, T. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 915–920.
(d) Kumar, S.; Engman, L. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 5400–5403. (e) Fukuzawa,
S.-i.; Tanihara, D.; Kikuchi, S. Synlett 2006, 2145–2147. (f) Bonaterra, M.;
Martin, S. E.; Rossi, R. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 3511–3515. (g) Ajiki,
K.; Hirano, M.; Tanaka, K. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4193–4195. (h) Beletskaya,
I. P.; Sigeev, A. S.; Peregudov, A. S.; Petrovskii, P. V. J. Organomet. Chem.
2000, 605, 96–101. (i) Saha, A.; Saha, D.; Ranu, B. C. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2009, 7, 1652–1657.
(4) (a) Taniguchi, N. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 1241–1245. (b) Wang, L.;
Wang, M.; Huang, F. Synlett 2005, 2007–2010.
(5) (a) Campbell, T. W.; Mccullough, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1945, 67,
1965–1966. (b) Greenburg, B.; Gould, E. S.; Burlant, Wm. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1956, 78, 4028–4029. (c) Godoi, B.; Speranca, A.; Back, D. F.; Brandao, R.;
Nogueira, C. W.; Zeni, G. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 3469–3477. (d) Tomoda,
S.; Takeuchi, Y.; Nomura, Y. Chem. Lett. 1982, 253–256. (e) Cohen, R. J.;
Fox, D. L.; Salvatore, R. N. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 4265–4268.
(6) Kabalka, G. W.; Venkataiah, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 3703–
3705.
(7) Bhadra, S.; Sreedhar, B.; Ranu, B. C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351,
2369–2378.
(8) Reddy, V. P.; Kumar, A. V.; Swapna, K.; Rao, K. R. Org. Lett. 2009,
11, 951–953.
(9) Singh, D.; Alberto, E. E.; Rodrigues, O. E. D.; Braga, A. L. Green
Chem. 2009, 11, 1521–1524.
(10) Gao, S.-Y.; Chittimalla, S. K.; Chuang, G. J.; Liao, C.-C. J. Org.
Chem. 2009, 74, 1632–1639.
(11) Ranu, B. C.; Mandal, T. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5793–5795.
(3) Evers, M. J.; Christiaens, L. E.; Renson, M. J. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51,
5196–5198.
4864 J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 4864–4867
Published on Web 06/18/2010
DOI: 10.1021/jo100755g
r
2010 American Chemical Society