synthesized via Pd catalyzed ring closure of N-aryl-N′-(o-
bromobenzyl)hydrazines, [N-aryl-N′-(o-bromobenzyl)-hy-
drazinato-N′]-triphenylphosphonium bromides,10 substituted
o-bromobenzaldehyde arylhydrazones,11 substituted o-bro-
moacetophenone arylhydrazones11b and hydrazones.12 An
alternative route involves condensation of hydrazine to
o-halo13 or o-alkoxy arylhydrazone,14 and more recently,
copper15,16 catalysis has been used for the intramolecular
amination of o-haloarylcarbonylic compounds. There are
however disadvantages of using such protocols such as
limitation of substrate choice, elevated temperatures, and the
requirement for metal mediated catalysis. An improved
intramolecular cyclization was recently reported by Stambuli
et al.,17 where mild conditions for the cyclization of
o-aminobenzoximes were developed, for selective oxime
activation, affording both 1H-indazoles and substitued-1H-
indazoles in good yield.
Scheme 2
.
Schematic Hypothesis: 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition of
Benzyne (1) and Nitrile Imines (2)
describe our studies on the development of a new route to
1-substituted-1H-indazoles using nitrile imines (2) as 1,3-
dipoles (Scheme 2).
Nitrile imines have been used extensively as 1,3-dipoles
in [3 + 2] cycloaddition reactions with alkynes yet, to the
best of our knowledge, have not been reported with benzyne
(1). The absence of literature precedence may be attributed
to the difficulty associated in forcing two highly unstable
intermediates to react preferentially with one another. In any
event, it presented a unique opportunity for us to exploit this
untapped transformation. Benzyne is well-known to undergo
self-dimerization to give biphenylene,23 whereas nitrile
imines can undergo [3 + 3] self-cycloaddition,24 fragmenta-
tion into nitriles,25 rearrangement into carbodiimides or
azirnes,26 and intramolecular cyclizations.27
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 1H-Indazoles via [3 + 2] Cycloaddition
Nitrile imines (2) are usually generated in situ by a base-
induced dehydrodechlorination of hydrozonyl chlorides,24,28
whereas arynes are easily accessible in situ, from o-
(trimethylsilyl)aryl triflates under very mild conditions.29 In
our work on 1,2-benzisoxazole chemistry, we demonstrated
that TBAF could mediate the in situ generation of both
benzyne (1) and nitrile oxides simultaneously21a and were
keen to determine if 1 and 2 could be obtained under
analogous conditions. Our studies began using o-(trimeth-
ylsilyl)phenyl triflate (3) as the benzyne precursor and
phenylbenzenecarbohydrazonoyl chloride (4) as a source of
nitrile imine (Table 1).
A variety of conditions were screened, varying fluoride
source, molar ratios, substrate concentrations, temperature,
and polar media (Table 1). Gratifyingly, all tested conditions
gave the target disubstituded-1H-indazole, 1,3-diphenyl-1H-
indazole (5) in varying yields. Using the strongly nucleophilc
fluoride source TBAF, the target indazole could only be
obtained in moderate yield (entries 1-4, Table 1). In each
case, a competing self-dimerization of the nitrile imine into
1,3-Dipolar cycloadditions of diazomethane derivatives
with benzyne offer an alternative route to 1H-indazoles
(Scheme 1). The first example was reported by Huisgen and
Knorr in 1961,18 and recent developments have been
described by the groups of Yamamoto (2007)19 and Larock
(2008).20 The latter methods gave 1H-indazoles in good
yields under very mild conditions. Even so, these protocols
were restricted to substrates bearing an ester group at the
3-position, limiting the diversity of the corresponding 1H-
indazole product. Consequently, we felt it desirable to
develop a protocol to access highly decorated N(1)-C(3)
disubstituted indazoles.
Recently, we have had considerable success employing
benzyne (1) in 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions in the
syntheses of 1,2-benzisoxazoles21 and benzotriazoles.22 We
were keen to build upon our expertise in this area, and herein
(13) Lukin, K.; Hsu, M. C.; Fernando, D.; Leanna, M. R. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 71, 8166–8172
.
(14) Zhenqi, Z.; Tongsheng, X.; Xiaonai, C.; Yuzhu, Q.; Zheng, Z.;
Hongwen, H. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1993, 1279–1280.
(15) Liu, R.; Zhu, Y.; Qin, L.; Ji, S. Synth. Commun. 2008, 38, 249–
254.
(23) Logullo, F. M.; Seitz, A. H.; Friedman, L. Org. Synth. 1968, 48,
12.
(16) Vin˜a, D.; Del Olmo, E.; Lo´pez-Pe´rez, J. L.; San Feliciano, A. Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 525–528.
(17) Counceller, C. M.; Eichman, C. C.; Wray, B. C.; Stambuli, J. P.
Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1021–1023.
(24) Huisgen, R.; Seidel, M.; Wallbillich, G.; Knupfer, H. Tetrahedron
1962, 17, 3–29.
(25) Toubro, N. H.; Holm, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 2093–
2094.
(18) Huisgen, R.; Knorr, R. Naturwissenschaften 1961, 48, 716.
(19) Jin, T.; Yamamoto, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 119, 3387–
3389.
(26) Fischer, S.; Wentrup, C. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1980, 502–
503.
(27) (a) Garanti, L.; Vigevani, A.; Zecchi, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976,
17, 1527–1528. (b) Wentrup, C.; Damerius, A.; Reichen, W. J. Org. Chem.
1978, 43, 2037–2041.
(20) Liu, Z.; Shi, F.; Martinez, P. D. G.; Raminelli, C.; Larock, R. C. J.
Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 219–226.
(21) (a) Spiteri, C.; Sharma, P.; Zhang, F.; Macdonald, S. J. F.; Keeling,
S.; Moses, J. E. Chem. Commun. 2010, 1272–1274. (b) Spiteri, C.; Mason,
C.; Zhang, F.; Ritson, D. J.; Sharma, P.; Keeling, S.; Moses, J. E. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 2537–2542.
(28) (a) Oida, T.; Shimizu, T.; Hayashi, Y.; Teramura, K. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 1981, 54, 1429–1433. (b) Tewari, R. S.; Dixit, P. D.; Parihar,
M. P. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1982, 19, 1573–1575
(29) Himeshima, Y.; Sonoda, T.; Kobayashi, H. Chem. Lett. 1983, 1211–
1214.
.
(22) Zhang, F.; Moses, J. E. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1587–1590.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 15, 2010
3369