T. E. Ballard et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 3537–3539
3539
Table 1
analogues. We also identified 2-amino-5-nitrothiazole analogues
(3a–e) that displayed better activity than the parent compound
NTZ (1) against PFOR utilizing microorganisms. While most of
the library members were inactive, head group 6 was discovered
to be only slightly less active while analogues of 9 were equipotent
or more active compared to NTZ or 3. Direct PFOR enzyme inhibi-
tion was also noteworthy for 9 although some activity may be re-
lated to nitroreduction activity. Overall we have been able to show
that head group modification is a viable route for the synthesis of
NTZ-related antibacterial analogues. Further modifications of 6 and
9 are currently under investigation as well as linkage of tail regions
with increased activity profiles. Disclosure of the full tail region li-
brary and biological activity will be presented in due course.
Selected NTZ-head group analogue activity
Analogue
MIC’s (
l
M)
PFOR inhibition
[Drug] = 40 M (%)
H. pylori
C. jejuni
C. difficile
l
Nitazoxanide (1)
13.0
0.5
1.3
3.5
2.9
0.8
0.9
8.8
5.7
6.9
2.6
1.3
0.5
2.5
2.6
39.1
2.1
3.0
4.7
2.9
12.5
36
0.8
8.2
32.1
0.4
1.0
2.1
28.8
>28.2
>22.7
>13.8
27.8
27.3
4.2
54
70
53
47
50
56
63a
59
27
51
7
8
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
6a
6b
6c
6d
9a
9b
9c
9d
9e
7.0
34.1
13.8
0.9
0.9
2.1
1.0
2
80 8a
55
Acknowledgment
47
20.0
3.5
77
0.4
66 13a
This work was supported by U01 Grant AI075520 from the Na-
tional Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to P.S.H.
a
Complex pattern of inhibition with two different rates.
Supplementary data
regions. All library members were also completely inactive against
E. coli indicating that PDH is not being targeted (data not shown).
The head group analogues 6a–d are direct derivatives of 3 with
6 bearing an additional 4-chloro substituent. The 4-chloro substi-
tuent imparts both steric and electronic effects on the thiazole,
notably the 5-nitro group. A slight reduction in activity for 6 com-
pared to 3 (H. pylori, C. jejuni MIC’s and PFOR) is most likely attrib-
utable to the steric interaction with the 5-nitro group forcing the
nitro slightly out-of-plane with the thiazole ring, lowering the res-
onance stability of the amide anion. More pronounced loss of activ-
ity against C. difficile for these analogues may be attributed to
minor differences in enzyme and binding pocket structure. Further
studies to support substitution at the 4-position employing a 4-
methyl or 4-bromo substituent are currently under investigation.
Recapitulation of bio-activity compared to 3a–e with 9a–e was
unanticipated but appreciated. Di-nitrothiophene 9 replaced thia-
zole 3 and improved activity for all analogues compared to 3
against H. pylori and C. jejuni with comparable activities against
C. difficile. Thiophenes 9a–e were subsequently assayed for their
ability to directly inhibit PFOR compared to 3a–e, and NTZ. Nearly
all of the thiophene analogues 9a–e inhibited PFOR to an equal or
greater extent then NTZ or 3a–e, respectively. Of note, several of
the 9a–e analogues inhibited PFOR at different inhibition rates pos-
sibility indicating that nitroreduction via PFOR may be occurring.
To test this, thiophenes 9a–e were subjected to an NfsB nitroreduc-
tase assay to determine if these analogues were substrates for
nitroreduction. Compared to NTZ, analogues 9b–e were only
slightly more susceptible to nitroreduction compared to a good
substrate (nitrofurazone), however analogue 9a showed higher
rates of nitroreduction (Supplementary data).
Complete analogue activity table, full biochemical and chemical
experimental procedures, spectral data for all new compounds and
representative spectra associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. Gilles, H. M.; Hoffman, P. S. Trends Parasitol. 2002, 18, 95.
2. Ortiz, J. J.; Chegne, N. L.; Gargala, G.; Favennec, L. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg.
2002, 96, 193.
3. Anderson, V. R.; Curran, M. P. Drugs 2007, 67, 1947.
4. Pankuch, G. A.; Appelbaum, P. C. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 1112.
5. Rossignol, J.-F.; Abu-Zekry, M.; Hussein, A.; Santoro, M. G. Lancet 2006, 368,
124.
6. Shamir, E. R.; Warthan, M.; Brown, S. P.; Nataro, J. P.; Guerrant, R. L.; Hoffman,
P. S. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 1526.
7. Tchouaffi-Nana, F.; Ballard, T. E.; Cary, C. H.; Macdonald, T. L.; Sifri, C. D.;
8. Rossignol, J. F. O.; La Frazia, S.; Chiappa, L.; Ciucci, A.; Santoro, M. G. J. Biol.
Chem. 2009, 284, 29798.
9. Rossignol, J.-F.; Elfert, A.; El-Gohary, Y.; Keeffe, E. B. Gastroenterology 2009, 136,
856.
10. de Carvalho, L. P. S.; Lin, G.; Jiang, X.; Nathan, C. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52,
5789.
11. Broekhuysen, J.; Stockis, A.; Lins, R. L.; De Graeve, J.; Rossignol, J. F. Int. J. Clin.
Pharmacol. Ther. 2000, 38, 387.
12. Olekhnovich, I. N.; Goodwin, A.; Hoffman, P. S. FEBS J. 2009, 276, 3354.
13. Megraud, F.; Occhialini, A.; Rossignol, J. F. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998,
42, 2836.
14. Hoffman, P. S.; Sisson, G.; Croxen, M. A.; Welch, K.; Harman, W. D.; Cremades,
N.; Morash, M. G. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 868.
15. Sisson, G.; Goodwin, A.; Raudonikiene, A.; Hughes, N. J.; Mukhopadhyay, A. K.;
Berg, D. E.; Hoffman, P. S. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 2116.
16. Cremades, N.; Bueno, M.; Toja, M.; Sancho, J. Biophys. Chem. 2005, 115, 267.
17. Evans, M. C.; Buchanan, B. B.; Arnon, D. I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1966, 55,
928.
18. Hoffman, P. S.; Goodman, T. G. J. Bacteriol. 1982, 150, 319.
19. Kletzin, A.; Adams, M. W. J. Bacteriol. 1996, 178, 248.
20. Gargala, G.; Le Goff, L.; Ballet, J.-J.; Favennec, L.; Stachulski, A. V.; Rossignol, J.-F.
21. Stadelmann, B.; Scholl, S.; Muller, J.; Hemphill, A. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
2010, 65, 512.
Analogue 9a possessing an increased risk for nitroreduction and
inhibition of PFOR through two rates may indicate multiple MoAs
that are responsible for the activity of this analogue. For analogues
9b–e, the nitroreduction assay results indicate that the di-nitrothi-
ophene analogues are more stable than anticipated and that activ-
ity against PFOR utilizing organisms is most likely due to direct
PFOR inhibition (like NTZ). We postulate that the double presenta-
tion of resonance stabilized nitro-groups for 9a–e is responsible for
activity and efforts to synthesize and assay mono-nitro thiophene
derivatives are currently being studied.
22. Rossignol, J. F. US20080097106, 2008.
23. Beck, G.; Reinecke, P.; Paulus, W.; Schmitt, H.-G. US4698357, 1987.
24. Beck, G.; Dutzmann, S.; Brandes, W.; Paulus, W. US5071865, 1991.
25. Fuccio, L.; Zagari, R. M.; Minardi, M. E.; Bazzoli, F. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther.
2007, 25, 133.
26. Young, K. T.; Davis, L. M.; DiRita, V. J. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 5, 665.
27. Kelly, C. P.; LaMont, J. T. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 1932.
28. Mylonakis, E.; Ryan, E. T.; Calderwood, S. B. Arch. Intern. Med. 2001, 161, 525.
Through this study we discovered two unique and active 2-ami-
no-5-nitrothiazole surrogate head groups from a library of 39