access to the bicyclic compounds comprising both the small
and the large rings,10 but controlling these reactions can be
difficult because of problems such as low yield caused by
side reactions and the formation of toxic residues. Therefore,
a more general method for preparing the small and the large
rings in a single reaction would be valuable. We envisioned
if the tandem RCM could be implemented as a general and
efficient platform for the macrocyclization as well, its
synthetic utility would become even greater. Herein, we
report the first general method for synthesizing the fused
bicyclic compounds comprising both the small and the large
rings with high isolated yields by the RCM reaction in a
single operation from the corresponding dienynes.
to form the small ring (kS) is far greater than the rate of
macrocyclization (kM) (Scheme 2). Indeed, a model study
Scheme 2. Scheme for the Selective Tandem RCM
To promote the tandem RCM reaction for the synthesis
of the fused bicyclic compounds comprising the small and
the large rings, we designed a dienyne containing a small
and a long tether. However a potential problem of this
tandem RCM would be that asymmetric dienynes with two
terminal alkenes result in the formation of two different
products with different ring sizes (Scheme 1). This is due to
1
and H NMR confirmed that 2 was the major intermediate
implying the initial formation of the small ring occurred
exclusively without signs of further dimerization or oligo-
merization when monitored during the first 3 h. This suggests
that although catalyst 1 may react with the terminal olefin
on the long tether, no productive RCM occurs. Instead, 1
undergoes fast exchange (kex) ensuring the formation of the
small ring as the first RCM event. Then the slow macrocy-
clization proceeds for a long period of time producing a
single isomer in 82% isolated yield. An alternative mecha-
nism for 1 reacting with the alkyne first is less likely due to
a more congested environment.
Scheme 1. General Pathway for Tandem RCM
To expand the scope of the reaction, various substrates
were subjected to the tandem RCM for the synthesis of
bicyclic[n.3.0] compounds (n ) 12-15). Even though the
second macro-RCM itself was challenging since there was
only one flexible chain, just 5 mol % of 1 in 4 mM toluene
at 50-90 °C was sufficient to promote the tandem RCM
with good to excellent isolated yields of the bicycles (Table
1). In most cases, stereochemistry of olefins on the macro-
cycles is exclusively trans. This selectivity is noteworthy
since E/Z selectivity still remains as a serious issue in the
macro-RCM reactions.12 For the synthesis of a fused
macrolactone (entry 2), changing solvent to 1,2-dichloroet-
hane resulted in better yield than in toluene. Substrates with
additional oxygen in the long tether (entries 3-5) gave
excellent yields favoring the macrocyclization.13 A protected
amine in the long tether also allowed tandem RCM with high
yield (entry 6). A bicycle with a more challenging tetra-
substituted alkene containing bicycle14 was also prepared in
good yield at 90 °C (entry 7). For this compound, small
amount of Z isomer (E/Z ) 8) of the olefin on the macrocycle
was observed.
a nonselective initiation on both tethered alkenes, which will
result in two different bicycles. To prevent this mixture issue,
temporal protection was used by replacing one of two
terminal alkenes with a disubstituted olefin so that the catalyst
would preferentially react with the terminal olefin.6,11 For
the synthesis of the fused bicycles comprising the small and
the large rings by the tandem RCM, we expected that the
selectivity issue might be eliminated if the rate of initial RCM
(5) (a) Fu¨rstner, A.; Langemann, K. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 3942. (b)
Fu¨rstner, A.; Kindler, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 39, 7005. (c) Lee, C. W.;
Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2145. (d) Smith, A. B., III; Kozmin,
S. A.; Adams, C. M.; Paone, D. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4984. (e)
Hansen, E. C.; Lee, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9582. (f) Gradilas,
A.; Perez-Castells, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6086. (g) Majumdar,
K. C.; Rahaman, H.; Roy, B. Curr. Org. Chem. 2007, 11, 1339.
(6) (a) Grubbs, R. H.; Kim, S. H.; Bowden, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 10801. (b) Kim, S. H.; Zuercher, W. J.; Bowden, N. B. J. Org. Chem.
1996, 61, 1073.
The compatibility of the tandem RCM for the synthesis
of bicyclic[n.4.0] (n ) 12, 13) compounds was also
(7) For recent applications see (a) Boyer, F.-D.; Hanna, I.; Ricard, L.
Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1817. (b) Niethe, A.; Fisher, D.; Blechert, S. J. Org.
Chem. 2008, 73, 3088. (c) Siegel, D. S.; Piizzi, G.; Piersanti, G.;
Movassaghi, M. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 9292. (d) For review, see Mori,
M. AdV. Synth. Cat. 2007, 349, 121.
(11) (a) Wu, C.-J.; Madhushaw, R. J.; Liu, R.-S. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
68, 7889. (b) Honda, T.; Namiki, H.; Kaneda, K.; Mizutani, H. Org. Lett.
2004, 6, 87–89. (c) Maifeld, S. V.; Miller, R. L.; Lee, D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 12228. (d) Maifeld, S. V.; Lee, D. Chem.sEur. J. 2005,
11, 6118.
(8) Nakano, A.; Takimoto, S.; Inanaga, J.; Katsuki, T.; Ouchida, S.;
Inoue, K.; Aiga, M.; Okukado, N.; Yamaguchi, M. Chem. Lett. 1979, 1019.
(9) For review on radical cyclizations, see Castle, S. L.; Srikanth, G. S. C.
Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 10377.
(12) (a) Busca, P.; Etheve-Quelquejeu, M.; Valre´y, J.-M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2003, 44, 9131. (b) Kim, Y. J.; Lee, D. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4351. (c)
Conrad, J. C.; Eelman, M. D.; Silva, J. A. D.; Monfette, S.; Parnas, H. H.;
Snelgrove, J. L.; Fogg, D. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1024.
(13) (a) Fu¨rstner, A. Top. Catal. 1997, 4, 285. (b) Delgado, M.; Martin,
J. D. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4798.
(10) (a) Jasperse, C. P.; Curran, D. P.; Fevig, T. L. Chem. ReV. 1991,
91, 1237. (b) Curran, D. P. Synlett. 1991, 63. (c) Haney, B. P.; Curran,
D. P. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 2007.
(14) Kirkland, T. A.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7310.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 15, 2010
3443