B.K. Sarojini et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 45 (2010) 3490e3496
3495
Table 4
Molecular docking results with Glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase.
Mol. no
Binding energy
Docking energy
Inhibitory constant
4.59e-006
Intermol energy
RMS
0.0
H-bonds
2
Bonding
4a
ꢀ7.28
ꢀ7.71
ꢀ7.59
AF1::DRG1:HAB:G6P:A:GLU591:OE2
AF1::DRG1:NAA:G6P:A:SER503:HN
¼¼¼¼¼¼¼¼¼¼¼¼¼¼¼¼
4b
4c
4d
4e
ꢀ7.0
ꢀ7.93
ꢀ7.97
ꢀ9.18
ꢀ8.02
7.43e-006
9.17e-006
9.57e-007
6.15e-006
ꢀ7.62
ꢀ7.81
ꢀ8.83
ꢀ7.73
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
1
1
1
ꢀ6.87
ꢀ8.21
ꢀ7.11
AF3::DRG1:OAK:G6P:A:THR405:HN
AF4::DRG1:NAK:G6P:A:GLN451:HN
AF5::DRG1:SAL:G6P:A:SER450:OG
4.1.3.4. 4-(2,5-Dichlorothien-3-yl)-2-(8-quinolinyl)-1,3-thiazole
(4d). 1H NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz):
7.92e8.02 (m, 2H, quinoline),
concentrations [MIC] was noted. The MIC values of tested
compounds are given in Table 3.
d
8.20 (s, 1H, thiophene), 8.43e8.45 (d, J ¼ 8 Hz, 1H, quinoline),
8.64e8.66 (d, J ¼ 8 Hz, 1H, quinoline), 9.03e9.05 (d, J ¼ 8 Hz, 1H,
quinoline), 9.23 (d, J ¼ 4 Hz,1H, quinoline), 9.44 (s, 1H, thiazole). 13C
4.4. Molecular docking studies
NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz):
d 122.81, 128.327, 129.28, 133.52, 134.40,
The synthesized molecules were subjected for molecular dock-
ing by calculating the minimum energy to inhibit the target protein
involved in the catalysis of complex reaction involving ammonia
140.14, 144.28, 148.77, 167.99. DEPT (DMSO, 100 MHz):
d 122.81,
128.33, 133.52, 134.41, 144.311, 148.75. MS (LCMS): m/z 173(quin-
oline acid fragment), no molecular ion peak.
transfer from L-glutamine to Fru-6-P, followed by isomerisation of
the formed fructosamine-6-phosphate to glucosamine-6-phos-
phate. The ligands were drawn in ChemDraw Ultra 6.0 assigned
with proper 2D orientation (ChemOffice package) and the structure
of each ligand was analyzed by using Chem-3D Ultra 6.0 (ChemO-
ffice package) and was checked for the connection error in bond
order. ADMET property was achieved through PreADMET server-
a web-based application for predicting ADMET data and building
drug-like library using in silico method. Energy of the molecules
was minimized using Dundee PRODRG2 Server. Then the file was
opened in SPDB viewer and C-terminal Oxygen was added using fit
module property. Active pockets were identified and ligplot of
PdbSum provided in the External links of PDB for the proteins was
downloaded from PDB. CASTp (Computed Atlas of Surface Topog-
raphy of proteins) server was used to crosscheck the active pockets
on target protein molecules. Autodock V3.0 was used to perform
Molecular Docking. The docking results for ligand molecules
against glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase [PDB Id: 1jka], showed
minimum docking energy, binding energy, inhibition constant,
intermolecular energy with 0.0 RMS as documented in Table 4.
4.1.3.5. 4-(2,5-Dichlorothien-3-yl)-2(3-pyridyl)-1,3-thiazole (4e). 1H
NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz):
d 7.81 (s, 1H, thiophene), 8.38e8.42
(t, 1H, pyridine), 8.52(s, 1H, thiazole), 9.04e9.035(d, 1H,
J ¼ 5.84 Hz, pyridine), 9.28e9.26 (d, 1H J ¼ 8.3 Hz, pyridine), 9.73
(s, 1H, pyridine). MS (LCMS): m/z 313.22 [Mþ], 315.22, [Mþ2],
317.22 [Mþ4].
4.2. Antifungal activity
Antifungal activity for newly prepared compounds was screened
by serial plate dilution method. Sabourands agar media was
prepared by dissolving peptone (1 g), D-glucose (4 g) and agar (2 g)
in distilled water (100 ml) and adjusting the pH to 5.7. Normal saline
was used to make a suspension of spores of fungal strain for lawning.
A loopful of particular fungal strain was transferred to 3 ml saline to
get a suspension of corresponding species. A 20 ml of agar media
was poured in to each of the petridishes. Excess of suspension was
decanted and the plates were dried by placing in an incubator at
37 ꢁC for 1 h. Using an agar punch wells were made on these seeded
Conflict of interest
agar plates and 10 mg/ml of the test compounds in DMSO were added
Authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
into each well labeled. A control was also prepared for the plates in
the same way using solvent DMSO. The petridishes were prepared in
triplicate and maintained at 37 ꢁC for 3e4 days. Antifungal activity
was determined by measuring the diameter of the inhibition zone.
Activity of each compound was compared with Amphotericin B as
standard. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for the
Acknowledgement
The authors are thankful to Dr. N. Suchetha Kumari, Department
of Biochemistry KSHEMA for her help in screening the compounds
for antimicrobial activity.
Amphotericin B in DMSO was more than 1 mg/ml against the tested
species. The MIC values of tested compounds are given in Table 2.
References
4.3. Antibacterial activity
[1] G. Beck, H. Heitzer. U.S. 4,748,243 (1998); Bayer Akleingesellschaft.
[2] H. Ul. Osaka, N.H. Matubara, I.M. Kawabe. U.S. 5180833 (1993), Takela
Chemical industries Ltd.
The newly synthesized thiazoles were screened for their anti-
bacterial activity against bacterial strains by disc diffusion method.
The discs measuring 6.25 mm in diameter were punched from
Whatman No. 1 filter paper. Batches of 100 discs were dispensed to
each screw capped bottles and sterilized by dry heat at 140 ꢁC for an
hour. The test compounds were prepared with different concentra-
tions using dimethyl formamide. One millilitre containing 100 times
the amount of chemical required in each disc was added to each
bottle which contains 100 discs. The discs of each concentration
were placed in triplicate in nutrient agar medium seeded with fresh
bacteria separately. The incubation was carried out at 37.8 ꢁC for
24 h. Nitrofurazone was used as a standard drug. Solvent and growth
controls were kept. The zone of inhibition and minimum inhibitory
[3] K. Schule, F. Ritchur, R. Seishiet, R. Krause, M. Mahlstadt, J. Prakt, Chemie 332
(1980) 629e637.
[4] R. Murugan, E.F.V. Scriven. WO 9845179/1998, Reilly Industries Inc.; Chem.
Abstr. 129 (1998) 3026633v. Downloaded By: [INFLIBNET India Order] At:
15:08 11 October 2009 Possible Antibacterial and Antifungal Agents 1389.
[5] A. Jackson, G. Heys, J.I. Grayson, R. Calrke. U.S. 5,705,652/1998, Fine Organics Ltd.
[6] R.M. Leanna, H.E. Morton. WO 9616050/1996, Abott Laboratories, USA, Chem.
Abstr., 125 (1996) 114603d.
[7] H. Tripathy, D.G. Pradhan, Agricult. Biol. Chem. 37 (1973) 1375e1383.
[8] J.L. Bayer, J.P. Denonte, G. Mourioux. EP 508901 (1992).
[9] M.Q. Zhang, A. Haemers, D. Vaden Berghe, S.R. Pattyn, W. Bolaert, J. Hetero-
cycl. Chem. 28 (1991) 673e674.
[10] Y. Katsura, S. Nishino, M. Ohno, K. Sakane, Y. Matsumoto, C. Morinaga,
H. Ishikawa, H. Takasugi, J. Med. Chem. 42 (1999) 2920e2926.
[11] X.Y. Yu, J.M. Hill, G. Yu, W. Wang, A.F. Kluge, P. Wendler, P. Gallant, Bioorg.
Med.Chem. Lett. 9 (1999) 375e380.