K. Sakurai, D. Kahne / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 3724–3727
3727
Protection of the C4 hydroxyl group as TMS ether and then oxida-
tion with mCPBA provided the B ring 4.
ity to the hydrophobic pockets of MDM2 with rigid backbone
structures and precisely positioned hydrophobic side chains.19–23
Therefore, additional structure-activity studies on the side chain
functionalities for the trisaccharide scaffold would be desired to
achieve the steric requirements for binding the MDM2 pocket. De-
tailed structural analysis on the present trisaccharide scaffold
would also facilitate further rational optimization of the design
of a helical p53-peptide mimic.
The A–C rings (3–5) were then assembled stepwise from the
reducing end to the non-reducing end using the sulfoxide-medi-
ated glycosylation reaction (Scheme 2).5,12–14 Both steps of the gly-
cosylation were achieved in good yields with corresponding
desired products as a single stereoisomer (78% for the A–B disac-
charide 15 and 75% for the A–B–C trisaccharide 2). For the glycosyl-
ation reaction between the A ring 3 and the B ring 4, small amounts
of the A–B–B trisaccharide was also isolated. This observation was
consistent with the earlier finding in our laboratory that the TMS
group could be cleaved during the sulfoxide glycosylation reac-
tion.5,13,14 Oxidative removal of the PMB group provided the trisac-
charide precursor 16. The alcohol 16 was furnished with four types
of Trp side chain analogues (17a–d) via esterification, which were
synthesized with good yields (79–99%). The desired trisaccharides
were to be achieved simply by a removal of a TBDPS group and the
reduction of azide groups. These final two steps, however, were
met with unexpected difficulties. First, the standard deprotecting
conditions for a TBDPS group using HF or TBAF failed to give the
desired diol (18a–d) without significant decomposition. The pres-
ence of bulky groups at the B ring presumably prohibited access
of the reagents to TBDPS group for desilylation. TAS-F in DMF
was thus used to deprotect the TBDPS group, which was success-
fully achieved with good yields (70–92%).17 The final step for the
reduction of the azide groups was performed in the presence of
polymer-supported triphenyl phosphine in the aqueous THF. The
resulting crude product was purified by reverse-phase HPLC as
TFA salts. While the use of resin-bound reducing agent greatly
facilitated the subsequent purification step of the products, the
overall yields were modest (14–55%). This is presumably due to
either inefficient hydrolysis of the iminophosphorane intermedi-
ates on resin or absorption of diamine products to the resin.
The inhibitory activity of the functionalized trisaccharides
against the p53-MDM2 interaction was evaluated by an inhibition
ELISA. In this assay, the wt-p53 15-mer peptide inhibited the p53-
In conclusion, we designed and synthesized functionalized
a-
1,4-linked trisaccharides modeled after a 15-residued helical re-
gion of p53. The synthesis of the target trisaccharides was achieved
by using the sulfoxide glycosylation reaction as the key methodol-
ogy. Two of the functionalized trisaccharides were found to weakly
inhibit the p53-MDM2 interaction. Our synthesis demonstrated an
efficient assembly of a trisaccharide scaffold, which should be use-
ful for further development of trisaccharide-based
for MDM2 binding.
a-helix mimics
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by National Institute of Health Grants
69721.
References and notes
1. Meutermans, W.; Le, G. T.; Becker, B. ChemMedChem 2006, 1, 1164. See
references therein.
2. Jensen, K. J.; Brask, J. Biopolymers 2005, 80, 747. See references therein.
3. Suhara, Y.; Izumi, M.; Ichikawa, M.; Penno, M.; Ichikawa, Y. Tetrahedron Lett.
1997, 38, 7167.
4. Hoffmann, R. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2054.
5. Xuereb, H.; Maletic, M.; Gildersleeve, J.; Pelczer, I.; Kahne, D. J. Am. Soc. Chem.
2000, 122, 1883.
6. Davis, J. M.; Tsou, L. K.; Hamilton, A. D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 326.
7. Kussie, P. H.; Gorina, S.; Marechal, V.; Elenbaas, B.; Moreau, J.; Levine, A. J.;
Pavletich, N. P. Science 1996, 274, 948.
8. Limieux, R. U.; Koto, S. Tetrahedron 1974, 30, 1933.
9. A crystal structure of galabiose (O-a-D-galactopyranosyl-1,4-D-galactopyranose)
shows an overall structure in support of our conformational analysis. See:
Svensson, G.; Albertsson, J.; Svensson, C.; Magnusson, G.; Dahmen, J. Carbohydr.
Res. 1986, 146, 29.
MDM2 interaction at an IC50 value of 4 lM, which was consistent
with the literature precedence.18 Two of the functionalized trisac-
charides (1c–d) showed weak inhibitory activity against the p53-
MDM2 interaction, while compounds 1a and 1b were inactive.
The quinoline-substituted trisaccharide 1d inhibited with an IC50
10. 2-Deoxy sugar was used for synthetic ease and for removal of potential steric
hinderance at the trisaccharide-MDM2 interface.
11. In our preliminary studies, related trisaccharides functionalized with
hydrophobic side chains exhibited solubility problems in aqueous solution.
12. Kahne, D.; Walker, S.; Cheng, Y.; Vanengen, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 6881.
13. Gildersleeve, J.; Pascal, R. A., Jr.; Kahne, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5961.
14. Gildersleeve, J.; Smith, A.; Sakurai, K.; Rhagavan, S.; Kahne, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 6176.
of 550
lM whereas the 3-bromoindole-bearing trisaccharide 1c
gave IC50 of 850
l
M. This finding was rather unexpected since 1a
and 1b display the same side chain functionalities as those of the
p53 peptide or its known high-affinity analogue.19 Our results sug-
gested that the presentation of the hydrophobic side chains on the
trisaccharide scaffold was not optimal for the interaction with
MDM2. This may be due to not only the scaffold conformation
but also the side chain conformation and positioning. The interac-
tion between the p53 peptide and MDM2 occurs through a double
induced-fit mechanism, which requires a highly complementary
interface to overcome the entropic penalty incurred. Recent struc-
tural studies on the p53 analogs complexed with MDM2 showed
that the inhibitor molecules fulfill the strict steric complementar-
15. Florent, J. C.; Monneret, C. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1987, 1171.
16. Daley, L.; Roger, P.; Monneret, C. J. Carbhydr. Chem. 1997, 16, 25.
17. Scheidt, K. A.; Chen, H.; Follows, B. C.; Chemler, S. R.; Coffey, D. S.; Roush, W. R.
J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6436.
18. Sakurai, K.; Chung, H.-S.; Kahne, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 16288.
19. Garcia-Echeverria, C.; Chène, P.; Blommers, M. J. J.; Furet, P. J. Med. Chem. 2000,
43, 3205.
20. Vassilev, L. T.; Vu, B. T.; Graves, B.; Carvajal, D.; Podlaski, F.; Filipovic, Z.; Kong,
N.; Kammlott, U.; Lukacs, C.; Klein, C.; Fotouhi, N.; Liu, E. A. Science 2004, 303,
844.
21. Grasberger, B. L. et al J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 909.
22. Sakurai, K.; Schubert, C.; Kahne, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11000.
23. Fasan, R.; Dias, R. L.; Moehle, K.; Zerbe, O.; Obrecht, D.; Mittl, P. R.; Grütter, M.
G.; Robinson, J. A. ChemBioChem 2006, 7, 515.