C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 3. A “Step 1” Photoproduct and Its Trapping
chromophore preparation, the necessity to use UV radiation (<350
nm), and lower quantum efficiencies of the release in some cases.
Several approaches for improving the monochromophoric linker
properties and the mechanism of step 2 are currently under
investigation in our laboratory.
Acknowledgment. This paper is dedicated to Prof. Richard S.
Givens on the occasion of his 70th birthday. Support for this work
was provided by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (203/
09/0748), the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech
Republic (MSM0021622413), and the European Union (CETO-
COEN; CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0001). We thank J. Wirz for valuable
comments and J. Frantisek (Ratiochem, Ltd., Brno) for mass
spectrometric data. T.S. acknowledges the Scholarship for talented
Ph.D. students of the Brno City.
electron reduction (hydroxylamines and anilines, respectively).31-33
Photorelease of a LG attached to the R-position of the phenacyl
chromophore is known to be initiated by hydrogen abstraction by
the triplet excited carbonyl group (Scheme 4a).13,34 Therefore, we
attempted to identify the intermediates responsible for LG release
after 3 (Scheme 3) is photolyzed in the presence of 2-propanol.
Density functional theory quantum chemical calculations showed
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
analytical data for all new compounds, and quantum chemical calcula-
tion results. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
References
(1) James, I. W. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 4855–4946.
(2) Backes, B. J.; Ellman, J. A. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1997, 1, 86–93.
(3) Bochet, C. G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 125–142.
(4) Goeldner, M.; Givens, R. S. Dynamic Studies in Biology; Wiley-WCH:
Weinheim, 2005.
(5) Pelliccioli, A. P.; Wirz, J. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2002, 1, 441–458.
(6) Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. ProtectiVe Groups in Organic Synthesis,
2nd ed.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1991.
(7) Bochet, C. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2071–2073.
(8) Li, S. W.; Marthandan, N.; Bowerman, D.; Garner, H. R.; Kodadek, T.
Chem. Commun. 2005, 581–583.
(9) Kessler, M.; Glatthar, R.; Giese, B.; Bochet, C. G. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1179–
1181.
(10) Schwo¨rer, M.; Wirz, J. HelV. Chim. Acta 2001, 84, 1441–1458.
(11) Il’ichev, Y. V.; Schwo¨rer, M. A.; Wirz, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
4581–4595.
(12) Sheehan, J. C.; Umezawa, K. J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 3771–3774.
(13) Banerjee, A.; Falvey, D. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 2965–2966.
(14) Kenner, G. W.; McDermot, J. R.; Sheppard, R. C. J. Chem. Soc. D 1971,
636–637.
that the n,π* triplet state of 12 is very low in energy (11 kcal mol-1
)
and that excitation is largely located on the nitrosobenzene moiety,
while the spin population resides on the nitroso group almost
exclusively. Therefore, reduction of the nitroso group to the corre-
sponding hydroxyamino derivative should be favored. Irradiation of
the model compound 4-methyl-3-nitroacetophenone (5, 5 × 10-3 M)
in acetonitrile in the presence of 10 molar excess of 2-propanol led to
4-methyl-3-aminoacetophenone (16) in ∼60% chemical yield; the
reduction intermediates 14 and 15 were not trapped (Scheme 4b).
Photoreduction of the acetyl group, closely related to the step 2
liberation of a LG, clearly did not occur until the later stages of this
multistep process. The alcohol 17 was formed almost quantitatively
after exhaustive irradiation. The chemical yields were evaluated from
changes in the absorption spectra of the irradiated solutions (see the
Supporting Information). Indeed, the quantum chemical calculations
revealed that excitation in the triplet state of 15 and 16 is located
preferentially on the carbonyl group, which makes it available for
hydrogen abstraction. These results are in agreement with our
experimental observation that more than 2 mol equiv of IPA was
required for extensive acid photorelease in step 2, as well as with the
fact that the photochemical efficiency of this reaction was rather low.
(15) Riguet, E.; Bochet, C. G. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5453–5456.
(16) Ramana, M. M. V.; Malik, S. S.; Parihar, J. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004,
45, 8681–8683.
(17) Bley, F.; Schaper, K.; Go¨rner, H. Photochem. Photobiol. 2008, 84, 162–
171.
(18) Yip, R. W.; Sharma, D. K.; Giasson, R.; Gravel, D. J. Phys. Chem. 1985,
89, 5328–5330.
(19) Sebej, P.; Solomek, T.; Hroudna, L.; Brancova, P.; Klan, P. J. Org. Chem.
2009, 74, 8647–8658.
(20) Galbavy, E. S.; Ram, K.; Anastasio, C. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-Chem.
2010, 209, 186–192.
(21) Haag, R.; Wirz, J.; Wagner, P. J. HelV. Chim. Acta 1977, 60, 2595–607.
(22) Givens, R. S.; Conrad, P. G.; Yousef, A. L.; Lee, J.-I. In CRC Handbook
of Organic Photochemistry and Photobiology; Horspool, W. M., Lenci,
F., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2004; Chapter 69, pp 1-46.
(23) Morrison, H. Biological Applications of Photochemical Switches; John
Wiley and Sons, Inc.: New York, 1993; Vol. 2.
Scheme 4. Photoreduction of Acetophenone Derivatives
(24) Gaplovsky, M.; Il’ichev, Y. V.; Kamdzhilov, Y.; Kombarova, S. V.; Mac,
M.; Schwo¨rer, M. A.; Wirz, J. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2005, 4, 33–42.
(25) Krishna, C. M.; Basu, S.; Roy, A. K. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 1996,
95, 111–113.
(26) Pei, K. M.; Ma, Y. F.; Zheng, X. M.; Li, H. Y. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2007,
437, 153–158.
(27) Lin, Y. N.; Jeng, G. Y.; Chan, T. T.; Yen, G. F.; Wong, Y. G. J. Chin.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 45, 313–318.
(28) Chen, L. J.; Burka, L. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 5351–5354.
(29) Rubin, M. B. In CRC Handbook of Organic Photochemistry and Photo-
biology; Horspool, W. M., Song, P.-S., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL,
1995; pp 437-448.
(30) Nau, W. M.; Pischel, U. In Organic Photochemistry and Photophysics;
Ramamurthy, V., Schanze, K. S., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2006;
Vol. 14, pp 75-129.
(31) Klan, P.; Wirz, J. Photochemistry of Organic Compounds: From Concepts
to Practice, 1st ed.; Wiley: Chichester, 2009.
In conclusion, a new concept of a photocleavable monochro-
mophoric linker was introduced in this work. The two LGs (a
primary alcohol/carboxylic acid) of an ANB moiety can be
disconnected selectively and orthogonally upon irradiation. The
current limitations of the application are poor solubility of the
system in aqueous solutions, mediocre yields of the protected
(32) Do¨pp, D. In CRC Handbook of Organic Photochemistry and Photobiology;
Horspool, W. M., Song, P.-S., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1995;
pp 1019-1062.
(33) Hashimoto, S.; Kano, K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1972, 45, 549–553.
(34) Banerjee, A.; Falvey, D. E. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 6245–6251.
JA1047736
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 33, 2010 11433