C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
isolated yield (90% yield, 92% ee; entry 10). We further found
that cyclopropylboronates with an aromatic heterocyclic group can
also be furnished with high enantioselectivity (92% ee; entries 11
and 12). Various functional groups such as chloro, ether, ester,
BocNR2, and acetal were tolerated in this reaction (entries 1, 2, 4, 8,
9, and 11), whereas the presence of ketone and bromo groups led to
diminished yields (entries 13 and 14). The substrate with an alkenyl
substituent did not undergo the cyclopropanation reaction (entry 15).
QuinoxP* showed a stereoselective feature (see the Supporting
Information). This catalyst-dependent stereospecificity/selectivity
switching is unique among the analogous copper(I)/diboron catalyst
systems; the cyclopropanation from silyl-substituted allylic carbon-
ates is a stereoselective reaction (trans product only), and the
cyclobutane synthesis reaction from homoallylic sulfonates showed
stereospecific features (from E substrate to cis product and vice
versa).5b,7 The detailed rationale for these differences requires
further mechanistic studies.
Table 2. Substrate Scope and Limitation for the Synthesis of
Optically Active Cyclopropylboronatesa
Scheme 1. Ligand-Controlled Product Switch with (E)-1a
Scheme 2. Explanation for the Formation of trans- and cis-4a
In conclusion, we have described a highly enantioselective
copper(I)-catalyzed synthesis of trans-aryl- and -heteroaryl-
substituted cyclopropylboronates from (Z)-allylic phosphates and
a diboron derivative. The reaction shows excellent diastereoselec-
tivity and good functional group compatibility. When (E)-allylic
phosphates were used as the substrate, the products switched from
the trans configuration in the presence of (R,R)-QuinoxP* to the
cis configuration in the presence of (R,R)-i-Pr-DuPhos. These
reactions offer a new, efficient route to chirally substituted
cyclopropylboronates.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the PRESTO
Program (JST) and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
(JSPS). C.Z. was supported by GCOE (Catalysis as the Basis for
Innovation in Materials Science, Hokkaido University).
a Conditions: 1 (0.4 mmol), 3 (0.48 mmol), CuCl (0.02 mmol), ligand
(0.024 mmol), K(O-t-Bu) (1.2 M in THF, 0.4 mmol), toluene (1.2 mL).
b Isolated yield. c Determined by 1H NMR analysis. d Determined by
HPLC. e Reaction was carried out at -10 °C.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
compound characterization data. This material is available free of charge
In the process of ligand screening using (E)-allylic phosphates,
we were surprised to find that the diastereoselectivity of the product
could be drastically switched by using different ligands (Scheme
1). In contrast to the observation that the cis product (cis-4a) was
produced with excellent yield (96% GC yield) when the (R,R)-i-
Pr-DuPhos ligand was used, the trans product [(1R,2R)-4a] was
obtained in the presence of (R,R)-QuinoxP*.10
References
(1) (a) Lebel, H.; Marcoux, J.-F.; Molinaro, C.; Charette, A. B. Chem. ReV.
2003, 103, 977. (b) Pietruszka, J. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 1051. (c) Rubin,
M.; Rubina, M.; Gevorgyan, V. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 3117. (d) Salaun,
J. Top. Curr. Chem. 2000, 207, 1. (e) Donaldson, W. A. Tetrahedron 2001,
57, 8589.
(2) (a) Hildebrand, J. P.; Marsden, S. P. Synlett 1996, 893. (b) Charette, A. B.;
De Freitas-Gil, R. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2809. (c) Zhou, S.-M.;
Deng, M.-Z.; Xia, L.-J.; Tang, M.-H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37,
2845. (d) Chen, H.; Deng, M.-Z. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 4444. (e) Chen,
H.; Deng, M.-Z. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1649. (f) Yao, M.-L.; Deng, M.-Z. J.
Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 5034. (g) Bubnov, Y. N.; Nesmeyanova, O. A.;
Rudashevskaya, T. Y.; Mikhailov, B. M.; Kazansky, B. A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1971, 12, 2153. (h) Pietruszka, J.; Solduga, G. Synlett 2008, 1349. (i)
Pietruszka, J.; Solduga, G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 5998.
(3) (a) Utimoto, K.; Tamura, M.; Tanouti, M.; Sisido, K. Tetrahedron 1972,
28, 5697. (b) Fontani, P.; Carboni, B.; Vaultier, M.; Carrie´, R. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1989, 30, 4815. (c) Priestley, E. S.; Decicco, C. P. Org. Lett. 2000,
2, 3095. (d) Fujioka, Y.; Amii, H. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 769.
A possible explanation for the product switching is shown in
Scheme 2. In the case of the reaction with the (R,R)-i-Pr-DuPhos
ligand, the addition product5b,11 generated from the reaction between
the borylcopper(I) intermediate and the (E)-allylic substrate un-
dergoes intramolecular substitution with retention of the stereo-
chemistry at the R-carbon atom on the copper(I) center to form
cis-4a. Contrary to this, the substitution reaction in the presence of
(R,R)-QuinoxP* would proceed with inversion of the stereochem-
istry, affording trans-4a.
(4) (a) Imai, T.; Mineta, H.; Nishida, S. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 4986. (b) Luithle,
J. E. A.; Pietruszka, J.; Witt, A. Chem. Commun. 1998, 2651. (c) Luithle,
J. E. A.; Pietruszka, J. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 8287. (d) Luithle, J. E. A.;
In other words, the reaction with (R,R)-i-Pr-DuPhos proceeded
in a stereospecific manner, whereas the reaction with (R,R)-
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 33, 2010 11441