Angewandte
Chemie
d.r., thus showing that there were no appreciable matched/
mismatched effects.
entry 2). As an alternative, we sought to trap the anion 6 as it
was formed with an electrophile, thus preventing its re-
addition to the boronic ester (Table 1, entries 2–5). Of the
electrophiles tested allyl bromide proved to be highly
effective, thus leading to 5 in high d.r. and e.r. (entry 5). The
relative stereochemistry of 5 was determined by X-ray
crystallography.[7]
However, the yield was only moderate (48%) and fell
further (32%) when we attempted to synthesize the other
diastereoisomer of 5 by using OꢀBrienꢀs (+)-sparteine surro-
gate [(+)-sps][8] in place of (À)-sparteine in the lithiation step
(Table 1, entry 6). We reasoned that the bulky diamine was
inhibiting the addition process and therefore explored
diamine-free conditions [generating the organolithium 10a
by tin–lithium exchange of the corresponding stannane 9a] to
make the carbanion less hindered.[9] This led to a considerably
higher yield (73%; Table 1, entry 7). The stannanes 9a and 9b
were easily obtained in high e.r. as shown in Scheme 3.[10]
When we carried out the reaction with the enantioen-
riched boronic ester 1 and enantioenriched lithiated carba-
mate 2 we were expecting to selectively form a single
diastereomeric ate complex 4 which should then rearrange
to give the single diastereomer 5 (Scheme 2b). However,
when we carried out this reaction we obtained 5 together with
8 in a ratio of 88:12, albeit with perfect e.r. (Table 1, entry 1).
Table 1: Optimization of conditions for the homologation of the tertiary
boronic ester 1 with 2/10a.
Entry Carbamate Quench d.r.[a]
e.r.[b]
Yield [%][c]
1
2
2
2
2
88:12 (5/8)
88:12(5/8)
98:2 (5/ent-8) >99:1 28
98:2(5/ent-8) >99:1 22
>99:1 n.d.
n.d. n.d.
2[d]
3
MeOH
MgBr2/
MeOH
AllylBr
AllylBr
AllylBr
4
5
6
7
2
98:2 (5/ent-8) >99:1 48
1:99 (5/ent-8) >99:1 32[f]
98:2 (5/ent-8) >99:1 73
ent-2[e]
10a
[a] Determined by GCMS. [b] Determined by HPLC using a chiral
stationary phase. [c] Yield of isolated 5. [d] Neopentyl glycol boronic ester
used. [e] (+)-sparteine surrogate used in place of (À)-sparteine. [f] Yield
of isolated ent-8.
Scheme 3. Preparation of diamine-free lithiated carbamates 10a and
10b. OCbx=3,3-dimethyl-1-oxa-4-azaspiro[4.5]decane-4-carboxylate,
(+)-sps=(+)-sparteine surrogate.
It was unclear at this point which of the two stereogenic
centers was epimerizing, and so further experiments were
conducted. Thus, the enantioenriched lithiated carbamate 2
was reacted with rac-1 and vice versa. Oxidation and analysis
of the secondary alcohol products by HPLC using a chiral
stationary phase enabled us to map the fate of each
stereogenic center individually during the homologation
process (see the Supporting Information). From these experi-
ments we determined that partial racemization had occurred,
not in the sensitive organolithium 2 bearing the secondary
center which is undergoing significant transformations, but at
the static quaternary stereogenic center derived from the
boronic ester, thus leading to the minor diastereoisomer 8.
The mechanism for its formation is shown in Scheme 2b.
After formation of the boronate complex 4, 1,2-metallate
rearrangement will give the major isomer 5. If this rearrange-
ment is slow, competing fragmentation to the benzylic
carbanion 6 can occur. Racemization of 6, re-addition to
boronic ester 7, and rearrangement then leads to the minor
diastereoisomer 8. In support of this mechanism, 7 was also
isolated in high e.r..
With these optimum reaction conditions we moved on to
synthesize the remaining three stereoisomers (Scheme 4).
Reaction of the enantiomer of the lithiated carbamate 10b
with 1 gave alcohol ent-8 in 99:1 d.r. and greater than 99:1 e.r.
Reaction of the opposite enantiomer of the boronic ester ent-
1 with the pair of lithiated carbamates 10a and 10b gave the
remaining isomers of the series in good yield and with
essentially perfect stereocontrol (Scheme 4). It is interesting
to note that even in the mismatched cases (forming 5 and ent-
5) very high diastereocontrol (> 97:3) was still observed.
We then sought to apply our methodology to a total
synthesis of the sesquiterpene (À)-filiformin. Disconnecting
the phenol ether of debromofiliformin leads back to 3-
hydroxylaurene (11), which itself could potentially be
obtained from an intramolecular Zweifel-type olefination of
12 (Scheme 5). This key intermediate could be synthesized
using the above methodology through reaction of 10a with
the tertiary boronic ester 13. The boronic ester 13 could in
turn be prepared by a lithiation/borylation of the known
carbamate 14 and primary boronic ester 15.
In an attempt to reduce the undesired fragmentation of 4
the less hindered neopentyl glycol boronic ester was tested,
since related neopentyl boronate complexes have been shown
to be less prone to reversibility than the corresponding
pinacol boronates.[3a,6] However, homologation of neopentyl-
1 gave similar results to that of the pinacol ester (Table 1,
The boronic ester 15 was prepared from bromomethyl
boronic acid pinacol ester and 2,3-dibromo-1-propene to give
15 in 81% yield using a procedure described by Knochel
(Scheme 6).[11] The carbamate 14 was prepared in three steps
starting from 2’-hydroxy-4’-methyl acetophenone as previ-
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 5552 –5555
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
5553