S. Chandrasekhar, N. Kiranmai / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 4058–4060
4059
OH
H
c
d
e
a, b
OH
TBSO
CO2Et
5
4
HO
TBSO
O
OEt
.
6
OH
9
7
TBSO
TBSO
O
8
O
O
O
O
g, h
O
O
O
k
i, j
f
CO2Et
3
TBSO
OMe
TBSO
N
O
10
O
O
O
O
12
11
O
O
OTBS
OH
l
m
q
OH OH
O
O
OH
o, p
RO
n
2
TBSO
O
O
O
OH
O
O
14 R = TBS;
15 R = H;
13
O
(de 3:1)
(+)-cardiobutanolide (1a)
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) TBSCl, imidazole, CH2Cl2, 30 min, 78%; (b) (COCl)2, DMSO, ꢀ78 °C, 2 h, 87%; (c) ethyl propiolate, LiHMDS, THF, ꢀ78 °C, 2 h, 77%; (d)
PPh3, benzene, rt, 3 h, 82%; (e) (DHQD)2PHAL (2 mol %), OsO4 (0.5 mol %), NMOꢁH2O, PEG-400 MW, 0 °C, 30 h, 84%; (f) 2,2-DMP, CSA (5 mol %), CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 30 min, 85%; (g)
(DHQD)2PHAL (2 mol %), OsO4 (0.5 mol %), PEG-400 MW (recovered system from step e) and NMOꢁH2O, 0 °C, 30 h, 80%; (h) 2,2-DMP, CSA (5 mol %), CH2Cl2, rt, 2 h, 75%; (i)
LiOH, THF–H2O (7:3), 0 °C, 3 h; (j) NH(Me)(OMe)ꢁHCl, DCC, TEA, DMAP, CH2Cl2, rt, 3 h (80% for two steps); (k) PhMgBr, THF, rt, 1 h, 85%; (l) NaBH4, CeCl3ꢁ7H2O, MeOH, ꢀ78 °C,
30 min, 74%; (m) TBSOTf, 2,6-lutidine, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 1 h, 82%; (n) CSA (cat), MeOH, 20 °C, 2 h, 85%; (o) BAIB, TEMPO, CH3CN–H2O (1:1), 0 °C to rt, 3 h; (p) CH2N2, ether, 0 °C,
30 min, 90% (for two steps); (q) TFA–H2O (9:1), concd HCl, CH2Cl2, 0 °C to rt, 3 h, 80%.
dihydroxylation of diene ester 4. Compound 4 was obtained from
the isomerization of 4-hydroxy-2-ynoic acid 5, which was in turn
prepared from 1,4-butane-diol (6) and ethyl propiolate.
The synthesis commenced from commercially available 1,4-
butanediol (6) which was transformed to the c-hydroxy ethyl pro-
piolate derivative (5), a critical intermediate for diene synthesis.
The selective mono silylation of diol 6 followed by Swern oxidation
of alcohol using oxalyl chloride and DMSO in dichloromethane at
ꢀ78 °C gave aldehyde 7. This was then subjected to the crucial step
to append the ethyl propiolate group. The lithiated ethyl propiolate
dichloromethane was achieved with TBSOTf/2,6-lutidine at 0 °C
for 1 h to give 14 in 82% yield. The selective deprotection of the pri-
mary silyl ether was accomplished with catalytic CSA in methanol
at 20 °C to get the alcohol 15. The exhaustive oxidation of primary
alcohol 15 to carboxylic acid followed by esterification furnished
globally protected aryl pentol acid 2 in 90% yield (for two steps).
The obvious deprotection under aq TFA in the presence of a drop
of concd HCl in dichloromethane at 0 °C allowed concomitant re-
moval of isopropylidine groups and silyl ether and also lactoniza-
tion to furnish the natural product (+)-cardiobutanolide.13 The
spectral features were in complete agreement with those reported
in the literature5,6 (Scheme 2).14
in THF was added to aldehyde 7 at ꢀ78 °C to yield
c-hydroxy ethyl
propiolate derivative 5. Following the protocol reported by Lu and
Guo,7 the hydroxy ethyl propiolate 5 was stirred in benzene in the
presence of PPh3 to yield the (E,E) diene ester 4 in 82% yield via al-
lene intermediate 8 which isomerizes to stable diene ester. The
enantio and regioselective Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation8
of diene ester 4 was achieved in a stepwise manner for easy isola-
tion. Thus 4 on exposure to (DHQD)2PHAL/OsO4/NMOꢁH2O in PEG
as reported by us9 provided diol 9 (>90% ee by HPLC). The
acetonide was prepared under standard conditions using 2,2-dime-
thoxypropane (2,2-DMP) and catalytic camphor sulfonic acid (CSA)
in dichloromethane for 30 min at 0 °C provided 10 in 85% yield.
Acetonide (10) was subjected to second Sharpless asymmetric
dihydroxylation10 under the same reaction medium to provide
diisopropylidine derivative 3 after acetonide formation with 2,2-
DMP and CSA in dichloromethane at room temperature for 2 h in
75% yield with good diastereoselectivity (8:2).11
In conclusion, the total synthesis of (+)-cardiobutanolide was
achieved through the application of diene ester synthesis, Sharp-
less asymmetric dihydroxylation protocol in PEG, and global
deprotection–lactonization in one-pot as key steps.
Acknowledgment
N.K. thanks the UGC, New Delhi, for financial support.
References and notes
1. For a review on styryllactones from Goniothalamus species, see: Blàzquez, M.
A.; Bermejo, A.; Zafra-Polo, M. C.; Cortes, D. Phytochem. Anal. 1999, 10, 161.
2. (a) Alali, F. Q.; Liu, X. X.; McLaughlin, J. L. J. Nat. Prod. 1999, 62, 504; (b) Zafra-
Polo, M. C.; Figadère, B.; Gallardo, T.; Tormo, J. R.; Cortès, D. Phytochemistry
1998, 48, 1087; (c) Cavè, A.; Figadère, B.; Laurens, A.; Cortés, D. Prog. Chem. Org.
Nat. Prod. 1997, 70, 81.
Hydrolysis of ester 3 with LiOH and amidation with Weinreb
salt provided amide 11 in 80% yield (for two steps). Exposure of
this to PhMgBr in THF at room temperature for 1 h gave aryl ketone
12 in 85% yield. This reaction and the previous asymmetric dihydr-
oxylation reaction allow in theory to create diversity in both ste-
reochemistry of hydroxyl groups and also in introducing
substituted aryl groups for analoging. The diastereoselective
reduction of prochiral ketone 12 using NaBH4 and CeCl3ꢁ7H2O in
MeOH at ꢀ78 °C produced the desired alcohol 13 with reasonable
diastereoselectivity (3:1), which was separated by silica gel chro-
matography.12a–c The silylation of the benzylic hydroxyl group in
3. On the cytotoxic activity and other bioactivity of styryllactones, see: Mereyala,
H. B.; Joe, M. Curr. Med. Chem.: Anti-Cancer Agents 2001, 1, 293.
4. For a review on the synthesis of styryllactones until 2004, see: Mondon, M.;
Gesson, J. P. Curr. Org. Synth. 2006, 3, 175.
5. Hisham, A.; Toubi, M.; Shuaily, W.; Bai, M. D. A.; Fujimoto, Y. Phytochemistry
2003, 62, 597.
6. For earlier synthetic approaches of (+)-cardiobutanolide, see: (a) Krishna, P. R.;
Kumas, E. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 6676; (b) Prasad, K. R.; Gholap, S. L. J.
Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 2916; (c) Ruiz, P.; Murga, J.; Carda, M.; Marco, J. A. J. Org.
Chem. 2005, 70, 713; (d) Matsuura, D.; Takabe, K.; Yoda, H. Tetrahedron Lett.
2006, 47, 1371; (e) Krishna, P. R.; Reddy, P. V. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47,
4627; (f) Garg, A.; Singh, R. P.; Singh, V. K. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 11240.
7. Guo, C.; Lu, X. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993, 394.
8. Xu, D.; Crispino, G.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7570–7571.