Table 6 Analytical data for the compounds 2–7
Found (%) (Required)
Compound
(Formula)
Yielda
(%)
Mp/ЊC
C
H
N
2 (C25H26N4O9)
3 (C25H26N4O9)
4 (C31H30N4O5)
5 (C31H30N4O5)
6 (C33H32N2O5)
7 (C33H32N2O5)
90
67
23
98
22
26
180 (trans), 215 (cis)
215 (decomp.)
202 (decomp.)
145 (decomp.)
197 (decomp.)
171–173
56.80 (57.02)
56.90 (57.02)
68.99 (69.12)
68.87 (69.12)
73.68 (73.85)
73.63 (73.85)
5.14 (4.98)
4.99 (4.98)
5.75 (5.62)
5.42 (5.62)
6.10 (6.01)
6.08 (6.01)
10.47 (10.65)
10.57 (10.65)
10.24 (10.41)
10.32 (10.41)
5.22 (5.22)
5.22 (5.22)
a Yields were not optimised.
aqueous methylamine (40%) are added and the solution is
refluxed for 20 minutes. After 3 hours at room temperature the
solvent is evaporated. The remaining oil is dissolved in ethanol.
The solvent is allowed to evaporate from the open beaker at
room temperature. It is recrystallised from ethanol in the same
manner (for analytical data see Table 6).
Electrostatic interactions were taken into consideration by
using a relative permittivity of ε = 4r with a distance dependent
function which, in our experience, gives relevant conformations
in agreement with solution conformations obtained by NMR
spectroscopy. The semiempirical calculations were carried out
using the PM318 hamiltonian as implemented within the
MOPAC 7.0 program in SYBYL. For comparison we also used
AM1 sometimes. The differences in heats of formations which
are of importance to the conclusions to be drawn in the paper
are in the same range as obtained with PM3. However, the
rather high deviations from experimental values of the heats of
formations of some nitro substituted benzene rings (nitro-
benzene, 3-nitrotoluene, 4-nitrotoluene) in the case of AM1
(9.78 kcal molϪ1 to 13.37 kcal molϪ1) in comparison to only
0.86 kcal molϪ1 to Ϫ2.83 kcal molϪ1 using PM3 led to the pref-
erence of PM3. The most stable conformations obtained from
the force field calculations were optimised with PM3 using
the keywords PRECISE, SCFCRT = 1.D-12, EF, NOINTER,
GEO-OK and GNORM = 0.1.
Preparation of the dimethyl 2,4-bis(1-naphthyl)-3,7-dimethyl-9-
oxo-3,7-diazabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane-1,5-dicarboxylate 6
Piperidone (0.0025 mol) is dissolved in 40 ml methanol under
reflux. Aqueous formaldehyde (1.2 ml, 35%) and 0.8 ml aque-
ous methylamine (40%) are added after 5, 20, 40 and 60 min-
utes. After 90 minutes the reaction is interrupted. The product
crystallises at room temperature. It is recrystallised from
ethanol (for analytical data see Table 6).
Preparation of the dimethyl 2,4-bis(2-naphthyl)-3,7-dimethyl-9-
oxo-3,7-diazabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane-1,5-dicarboxylate 7
Piperidone (0.0025 mol) is dissolved in 40 ml methanol under
reflux. Aqueous formaldehyde (1.2 ml, 35%) and 0.8 ml aque-
ous methylamine (40%) are added and the solution is refluxed
for 30 minutes. The product crystallises after 3–4 days at room
temperature. It is recrystallised from ethanol (for analytical
data see Table 6).
Acknowledgements
Thanks are due to the DFG for financial support and Mrs
Ilona Knoblauch for carefully measuring the NMR spectra.
References
NMR measurements
1 B. Kögel, T. Christoph, E. Friderichs, H.-H. Hennies, T. Mathiesen,
J. Schneider and U. Holzgrabe, CNS Drug Rev., 1998, 4, 54.
2 R. Jeyaraman and S. Avila, Chem. Rev., 1981, 81, 149.
3 N. S. Zefirov and V. A. Palyulin, Top. Stereochem., 1991, 20, 171.
4 U. Holzgrabe-Ashauer and T. Busch, Z. Naturforsch., Teil B, 1988,
43, 873.
5 W. Brandt, S. Drosihn, M. Haurand, U. Holzgrabe and C.
Nachtsheim, Arch. Pharm. Pharm. Med. Chem., 1996, 329, 311.
6 R. Haller and H. Unholzer, Arch. Pharm. (Weinheim), 1971, 304,
654.
7 H. Küppers, Hesse, U. Holzgrabe and R. Haller, Z. Naturforsch.,
Teil B, 1987, 42, 221.
8 U. Holzgrabe and E. Erciyas, Arch. Pharm. (Weinheim), 1992, 325,
657.
9 A. Samhammer, U. Holzgrabe and R. Haller, Arch. Pharm.
(Weinheim), 1989, 322, 551.
10 H. Günther, NMR-Spektroskopie, VCH, Weinheim, 1983, p. 228.
11 A. E. Derome, Modern NMR Techniques for Chemistry Research,
Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1987, p. 109.
12 H. Günther, NMR Spektroskopie, Thieme, Stuttgart, 1983, p. 75.
13 E. L. Eliel and S. H. Wilen, Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds,
Wiley, New York, 1994, p. 1150.
14 Tripos Associates Inc., 1699 S. Hanley Road, Suite 3.
15 M. Clark, R. D. Cramer III and N. Van Opdenbosch, J. Comput.
Chem., 1989, 10, 982.
All 1H and 13C NMR experiments spectra were performed on a
Varian XL 300 FT NMR spectrometer operating at 299.956
MHz (1H) and 75 MHz (13C) with a sample temperature of
30 ЊC. In the case of the 1H NMR spectra, a varying number of
scans (depending on the experiment) with a frequency range of
2200 Hz were collected into 65 000 data points, giving a digital
resolution of 0.33 Hz pointϪ1. An appropriate Gaussian func-
tion was applied before Fourier transformation to enhance the
spectra resolution. Abbreviations for data quoted are: s,
singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; m, multiplet. 1H and 13
C
NMR assignments given for each compound were confirmed by
randomly running HETCOR and H,H-COSY experiments.
Theoretical methods
All molecules were constructed with the molecular modelling
program SYBYL 6.414 on Silicon Graphics Workstations. Each
flexible molecule was subjected to an extensive conformational
search by systematically rotating each rotatable bond by 30Њ
increments. An energy cut-off of 7 kcal molϪ1 above the energy
minimum was applied. All conformations obtained from the
search were grouped into families based on similarities of their
dihedral angles ( 30Њ). Using the TRIPOS force field15 and the
Powell minimizer contained in SYBYL/MAXIMIN, the lowest
energy member of each conformational family was then exten-
sively minimized. The Gasteiger method (PEOE) was used to
calculate the partial charge distribution of the molecules.16,17
16 J. Gasteiger and M. Marsili, Tetrahedron, 1980, 36, 3219.
17 J. Gasteiger and H. Saller, Angew. Chem., 1985, 97, 699.
18 J. J. P. Stewart, J. Comput. Chem., 1989, 10, 209.
Paper 8/06641H
1834
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1999, 1827–1834