7410 Macromolecules, Vol. 43, No. 18, 2010
Sakai et al.
atmosphere, 1 (1.00 g, 2.69 mmol) was weighed into a flask and
dissolved in dry THF (85.5 mL). To the solution was added a
solution of Rh(nbd)BPh4 (27.6 mg, 53.7 μmol) in dry THF (4.0
mL). After stirring at room temperature for 24 h, to the reaction
mixture was added triphenylphosphine (84.6 mg, 322 μmol).
The solution was concentrated and then poured into a large
amount of CH2Cl2. The precipitate was purified by reprecipita-
tion with CH2Cl2 and then dried under reduced pressure to give
poly-1 as a black powder. Yield: 887 mg (88.7%). Mn = 1.7 ꢀ
105, Mw/Mn =1.8.
(3) Gunnlaugsson, T.; Glynn, M.; Tocci, G. M.; Kruger, P. E.; Pfeffer,
F. M. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250 (23-24), 3094–3117.
(4) Gale, P. A.; Quesada, R. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250 (23-24),
3219–3244.
(5) Anzenbacher, P., Jr.; Nishiyabu, R.; Palacios, M. A. Coord. Chem.
Rev. 2006, 250 (23-24), 2929–2938.
(6) Davis, A. P. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250 (23-24), 2939–2951.
(7) Katayev, E. A.; Ustynyuk, Y. A.; Sessler, J. L. Coord. Chem. Rev.
2006, 250 (23-24), 3004–3037.
(8) Miyaji, H.; Sessler, J. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40 (1),
154–157.
(9) Palacios, M. A.; Nishiyabu, R.; Marquez, M.; Anzenbacher, P.
Typical Experimental Procedure for UV-vis Absorption Mea-
surements. All UV-vis absorption measurements were perfor-
med in dry THF. The concentrations of poly-1 and poly-2,
which were calculated on the basis of the monomeric units, were
130 μM for all the measurements. A typical experimental
procedure is described as follows: Stock solutions of poly-1
(537 μM) and tetra-n-butylammonium acetate (TBAA) (1.34 mM)
in THF were prepared in flasks equipped with stopcocks,
respectively. The poly-1 solution (1 mL) and the TBAA solution
(0.4 mL) were transferred to a vial, and then the resulting
mixture was diluted with dry THF (2.6 mL) to give the sample
solution, of which [monomeric units of poly-1] and [TBAA]/
[monomeric units of poly-1] were adjusted to be 130 μM and 1.0,
respectively. The UV-vis absorption spectrum of the resulting
sample solution was measured in a glass cell with a 10 mm path
length at 25 ꢀC.
Absorption Titrations and Hill Plots. Sample solution with
varying anion amount was prepared in accordance with the above
procedure, and the absorption spectra were taken to determine
the change. The titration curve was obtained by plotting the
absorbance at the proper wavelength versus the [anion]/[urea]
ratio. The binding data were further analyzed using the Hill
equation: log(Y/(1 - Y))=n log[anion] þ n log Ka, where Y, Ka,
and n represent the fractional saturation of the host, the
apparent microscopic association constant, and the Hill coeffi-
cient, respectively. The Y value was calculated by the following
equation: Y=ΔAobs/ΔAmax =(Aobs - A0)/(Amax - A0), where
A0, Aobs, and Amax represent the inherent absorbance of polymer
sample, the absorbance in the presence of anion guests, and the
maximum absorbance obtained when the absorption change
was completed at the selected wavelength. The Ka and n values
were determined from the slope and Y-intercept in the resulting
Hill plots. The Ka value estimated in this calculation means the
apparent binding constant of one urea receptor unit, that is, the
monomeric unit in the cases of poly-1 and poly-2.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129 (24), 7538–7544.
(10) Takeuchi, M.; Ikeda, M.; Sugasaki, A.; Shinkai, S. Acc. Chem. Res.
2001, 34 (11), 865–873.
(11) Shinkai, S.; Ikeda, M.; Sugasaki, A.; Takeuchi, M. Acc. Chem. Res.
2001, 34 (6), 494–503.
(12) Takeuchi, M.; Shioya, T.; Swager, T. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2001, 40 (18), 3372–3376.
(13) Hirata, O.; Takeuchi, M.; Shinkai, S. Chem. Commun. 2005, 30,
3805–3807.
(14) dos Santos, C. M. G.; McCabe, T.; Watson, G. W.; Kruger, P. E.;
Gunnlaugsson, T. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73 (23), 9235–9244.
(15) Willans, C. E.; Anderson, K. M.; Potts, L. C.; Steed, J. W. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7 (13), 2756–2760.
(16) Okamoto, Y.; Nakano, T. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94 (2), 349–372.
(17) McQuade, D. T.; Pullen, A. E.; Swager, T. M. Chem. Rev. 2000,
100 (7), 2537–2574.
(18) Hill, D. J.; Mio, M. J.; Prince, R. B.; Hughes, T. S.; Moore, J. S.
Chem. Rev. 2001, 101 (12), 3893–4012.
(19) Nakano, T.; Okamoto, Y. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101 (12), 4013–4038.
(20) Cornelissen, J. J. L. M.; Rowan, A. E.; Nolte, R. J. M.; Sommerdijk,
N. A. J. M. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101 (12), 4039–4070.
(21) Thomas, S. W.; Joly, G. D.; Swager, T. M. Chem. Rev. 2007,
107 (4), 1339–1386.
(22) Yashima, E.; Maeda, K.; Nishimura, T. Chem. Eur. J. 2004,
10 (1), 42–51.
(23) Yashima, E.; Maeda, K. Macromolecules 2008, 41 (1), 3–12.
(24) Kakuchi, R.; Nagata, S.; Sakai, R.; Otsuka, I.; Nakade, H.; Satoh,
T.; Kakuchi, T. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14 (33), 10259–10266.
(25) Kakuchi, R.; Nagata, S.; Tago, Y.; Sakai, R.; Otsuka, I.; Satoh, T.;
Kakuchi, T. Macromolecules 2009, 42 (5), 1476–1481.
(26) Kakuchi, R.; Tago, Y.; Sakai, R.; Satoh, T.; Kakuchi, T. Macro-
molecules 2009, 42 (13), 4430–4435.
(27) Kakuchi, R.; Kodama, T.; Shimada, R.; Tago, Y.; Sakai, R.;
Satoh, T.; Kakuchi, T. Macromolecules 2009, 42 (12), 3892–3897.
(28) Amendola, V.; Boiocchi, M.; Colasson, B.; Fabbrizzi, L. Inorg.
Chem. 2006, 45 (16), 6138–6147.
(29) Nishiyabu, R.; Anzenbacher, P. Org. Lett. 2006, 8 (3), 359–362.
(30) Gomez, D. E.; Fabbrizzi, L.; Licchelli, M.; Monzani, E. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3 (8), 1495–1500.
(31) Jose, D. A.; Kumar, D. K.; Ganguly, B.; Das, A. Tetrahedron Lett.
2005, 46 (32), 5343–5346.
Job’s Plots. THF solutions of poly-1 and TBAA were mixed
to prepare sample solution with varying molar fractions of the
monomeic units of poly-1 (χ) from 0 to 1. The total concentra-
-
(32) Amendola, V.; Esteban-Gomez, D.; Fabbrizzi, L.; Licchelli, M.
Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39 (5), 343–353.
(33) Gale, P. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39 (7), 465–475.
(34) Boiocchi, M.; Del Boca, L.; Gomez, D. E.; Fabbrizzi, L.;
Licchelli, M.; Monzani, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (50),
16507–16514.
tion of monomeric units of poly-1 and CH3CO2 was kept
constant at 260 μM. UV-vis measurement of each sample was
performed. Absorbance at 470 nm were normalized to the
variation of absorbance (ΔA470) with the following equation:
ΔA470 = Aobs - χA0, where A0 is absorbance of poly-1 itself in
THF at 260 μM (χ = 1). Job’s plots were obtained by plotting
ΔA470 values against χ.
(35) The binding data were analyzed using the Hill equation: log(Y/(1 -
Y))=n log[anion] þ n log Ka, where Y is the fractional saturation of
the host, Ka is the apparent microscopic association constant, and n
is the Hill coefficient. See: Connors, K. A. Binding Constants: the
Measurement of Molecular Complex Stability; Wiley: New York,
1987; pp 59-65.
(36) One reviewer of this paper pointed out the possibility that the newly
developed absorbance at 470 nm corresponds not to the quantity of
anion bound to polymer but to the extent of conformational
change. This is definitely sensible. In fact, Yashima et al. have
reported amplification of circular dichroism (CD) signal based on
cooperative conformational change of polymer chain.37 However,
we think such possibility is excluded by the following reasons:
(1) Poly-1 shows the colorimetric response by the addition of anions,
in which conformational change of poly-1 actually plays crucial
roles as well as the complex formation. However, the colorimetric
response is unexplainable by only the conformation change of poly-1.
In contrast to CD signals, abosorption change should be ascribable
to the complex formation event. (2) In anion recognition chemistry,
Acknowledgment. We gratefully acknowledge the Global
COE Program (Catalysis as the Basis for Innovation in Materials
Science) of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
and Technology, Japan, for the financial support.
Supporting Information Available: UV-vis absorption
titration of poly-1 and poly-2 in the presence of TBA salts of
anions and the resulting Hill plots. This material is available free
References and Notes
(1) Caltagirone, C.; Gale, P. A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38 (2), 520–563.
(2) Martinez-Manez, R.; Sancenon, F. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103 (11),
4419–4476.