into flexible structures. Also, ruthenium dyes are expensive,
and their preparation includes lengthy purification steps.4
Accurate engineering of the sensitization wavelength would
also benefit from a replacement organic dye. Not surprisingly,
a large number of laboratories around the world are actively
pursuing potential candidates for sensitizers for DSSC
applications.5
Boron-dipyrrin or Bodipy dyes are interesting chro-
mophores with high quantum yields and absorptivity,6
typically with typical bright green fluorescence. We7 and
others8 have found ways to transform these dyes to absorb
essentially all colors of the rainbow and then some. A few
years ago, we published the first report9 of a rationally
functionalized Bodipy-based photosensitizer, taking advan-
tage of some of the superior characteristics of this class of
dyes. Others followed with equally promising Bodipy
derivatives.10 Calculations at various levels of the theory9,11
suggested that excitation of the Bodipy chromophore results
in significant reorganization of the electron distribution,
setting up the scene for efficient electron transfer to nanoc-
rystalline titania from the S1 state of the dye. Needless to
say, further optimization of the Bodipy derivatives may
provide better sensitizers for use in DSSCs.
In order to bypass the limitations imposed by liquid
electrolytes, one of the most common hole transport materials
(HTM) is 2,2′,7,7′-tetrakis(N,N-di-p-methoxyphenyl-amine)-
9,9′-spirobifluorene (spiro-OMeTAD).5l,12 In this work, our
goal was to investigate the performance of rationally designed
boron-dipyrrin sensitizers in connection with spiro-OMeTAD
hole transport material.
In our previous work,9 we synthesized sensitizer 1 (Figure
1) and reported its efficiency in a standard DSSC setup using
(4) Choi, H.; Raabe, I.; Kim, D.; Teocoli, F.; Kim, C.; Song, K.; Yum,
J.-H.; Ko, J.; Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Gra¨tzel, M. Chem.sEur. J. 2010, 16,
1193.
(5) (a) Mishra, A.; Fischer, M. K. R.; Bauerle, P. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2009, 48, 2474. (b) Ooyama, Y.; Harima, Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009,
2903. (c) Hagberg, D. P.; Yum, J.-H.; Lee, H.; De Angelis, F.; Marinado,
T.; Karlsson, K. M.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Sun, L.; Hagfeldt, A.; G|Adratzel,
M.; Nazeeruddin, M. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6259. (d) Ito, S.;
Zakeeruddin, S. M.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Liska, P.; Charvet, R.; Comte,
P.; Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Pe´chy, P.; Takata, M.; Miura, H.; Uchida, S.;
Gra¨tzel, M. AdV. Mater. 2006, 18, 1202. (e) Hwang, S.; Lee, J. H.; Park,
C.; Lee, H.; Kim, C.; Park, C.; Lee, M.-H.; Lee, W.; Park, J.; Kim, K.;
Park, N.-G.; Kim, C. Chem. Commund. 2007, 4887. (f) Ito, S.; Miura, H.;
Uchida, S.; Takata, M.; Sumioka, K.; Liska, P.; Comte, P.; Pe´chy, P.;
Gra¨tzel, M. Chem. Commun. 2008, 5194. (g) He, J.; Benko¨, G.; Korodi,
F.; Polivka, T.; Lomoth, R.; Åkermark, B.; Sun, L.; Hagfeldt, A.; Sundstro¨m,
V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4922. (h) Velusamy, M.; Huang, J.-H.;
Hsu, Y.-C.; Chou, H.-H.; Ho, K.-C.; Wu, P.-L.; Chang, W.-H.; Lin, J. T.;
Chu, C. W. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4898. (i) Mei, J.; Graham, K. R.; Stalder,
R.; Reynolds, J. R. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 660. (j) Koumura, N.; Wang, Z. S.;
Mori, S.; Miyashita, M.; Suzuki, E.; Hara, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 14256. (k) Lin, J. T.; Chen, P.-C.; Yen, Y.-S.; Hsu, Y.-C.; Chou, H.-
H.; Yeh, M.-C. P. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 97. (l) Lohwasser, R. H.; Bandara,
J.; Thelakkat, M. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 4126.
Figure 1. Sensitizers used in this study.
a iodide/triiodide redox couple in solution as electrolyte. In
this work, however, we targeted two more boron-dipyrrin
dyes, compounds 2 and 3, in an attempt to clarify relative
effects of various modifications on the efficiency. The
rationale behind the two new sensitizers was as follows. In
compound 1, the meso-phenyl substituent is orthogonal as a
result of the presence of methyl groups at the 3 and 5
positions of the Bodipy core. It is very likely that a new
sensitizer in which protruding methyls are not present (such
as sensitizer 2) could have the phenyl substituent with a
smaller dihedral angle, leading to extended conjugation and
facilitated charge transfer from the donor groups to the
electron-withdrawing (and anchoring) carboxylic acid ter-
minal. In addition, in sensitizer 2, we placed additional
electron-donor p-methoxy groups on the diphenylaminophe-
nyl charge donor moiety, again looking for a more efficient
excited state charge transfer. In the design of sensitizer 3,
we included two decyl chains on the meso-phenyl substituent
in order to minimize aggregation-induced losses in efficiency.
In addition, a cyanoacetic acid derived electron-withdrawing
anchor group was moved to position 2 of the Bodipy core.
It is apparent that in this design the cyano acetylidene group
will be in full conjugation with the Bodipy chromophore.
The syntheses of the novel sensitizers 2 and 3 were based
on versatile Bodipy chemistry. 8-Carboxyphenyl-Bodipy (4)
(6) Recent reviews on BODIPY dyes, see: (a) Ulrich, G.; Ziessel, R.;
Harriman, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1184. (b) Ziessel, R.; Ulrich,
G.; Harriman, A. New J. Chem. 2007, 31, 496. (c) Loudet, A.; Burgess, K.
Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 4891.
(7) (a) Buyukcakir, O.; Bozdemir, O. A.; Kolemen, S.; Erbas, S.; Akkaya,
E. U. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4644. (b) Cakmak, Y.; Akkaya, E. U. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 85. (c) Erbas, S.; Gorgulu, A.; Kocakusakogullari, M.; Akkaya,
E. U. Chem. Commun. 2009, 33, 4956. (d) Dost, Z.; Atilgan, S.; Akkaya,
E. U. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 8484. (e) Deniz, E.; Isbasar, G. C.; Bozdemir,
O. A.; Yildirim, L. T.; Siemiarczuk, A.; Akkaya, E. U. Org. Lett. 2008,
10, 3401.
(8) (a) Rurack, K.; Kollmannsberger, M.; Daub, J. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2001, 40, 385. (b) Umezawa, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Makino, H.; Citterio,
D.; Suzuki, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1550. (c) Zhang, D.; Wen,
Y.; Xiao, Y.; Yu, G.; Liu, Y.; Qian, X. Chem. Commun. 2008, 4777. (d)
Atilgan, S.; Kutuk, I.; Ozdemir, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 892.
(9) Erten-Ela, S.; Yilmaz, D.; Icli, B.; Dede, Y.; Icli, S.; Akkaya, E. U.
Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3299.
(10) (a) Rousseau, T.; Cravino, A.; Bura, T.; Ulrich, G.; Ziessel, R.;
Roncali, J. Chem. Commun. 2009, 1673. (b) Rousseau, T.; Cravino, A.;
Bura, T.; Ulrich, G.; Ziessel, R. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 2298. (c) Hattori,
S.; Ohkubo, K.; Urano, Y.; Sunahara, H.; Nagano, T.; Wada, Y.; Tkachenko,
N. V.; Lemmetyinen, H.; Fukuzumi, S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 15368.
(d) Forgie, J. C.; Skabara, P. J.; Stibor, I.; Vilela, F.; Vobecka, Z. Chem.
Mater. 2009, 21, 1784. (e) Lee, C. Y.; Hupp, J. T. Langmuir 2010, 26,
3760. (f) Kumaresan, D.; Thummel, R. P.; Bura, T.; Ulrich, G.; Ziessel, R.
Chem.sEur. J. 2009, 15, 6335.
(11) Bozdemir, O. A.; Guliyev, R.; Buyukcakir, O.; Selcuk, S.; Kolemen,
S.; Gulseren, G.; Nalbantoglu, T.; Boyaci, H.; Akkaya, E. U. J. Am. Chem.
(12) (a) Bach, U.; Lupo, D.; Comte, P.; Moser, J. E.; Weisso¨rtel, F.;
Soc. 2010, 132, 8029
.
Salbeck, H.; Spreitzer, H.; Gra¨tzel, M. Nature 1998, 395, 583.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 17, 2010
3813