of catalytic methodology.17 Drawing from recent experiences
in the field of copper-catalyzed diazo metallocarbene reac-
tions,18 we herein disclose a Cu-catalyzed decomposition of
sulfonyl hydrazone (Scheme 1). A wide variety of sulfones
were obtained in moderate to good yields.
Scheme 1. Methods toward the Preparation of Sulfones
First, the decomposition of tosyl hydrazone 1a, which was
derived from benzophenone, was chosen as a model system
for optimization of the reaction conditions (Table 1). Initially,
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditionsa
panations,8 epoxidations,9 and aziridinations.10 Recently,
Valde´s and co-workers have reported metal-free coupling
of tosylhydrazones with boronic acids11 or hydroxylic
compounds,12 which significantly improved the application
of sulfonyl hydrazones.
entry
catalyst
base
solvent
yieldb (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
dioxane
dioxane
dioxane
dioxane
dioxane
dioxane
dioxane
dioxane
DMSO
toluene
dioxane
dioxane
dioxane
dioxane
trace
83
75
78
84
trace
46
trace
14
47
63
CuI/Pro
CuI/bpy
CuI/TMEDA
CuI
CuI
CuI
CuI
CuI
CuI
As early as 1952, Bamford and Stevens described that
thermal decomposition of tosylhydrazones under basic media
gave rise to diazo compounds, which went through a carbene
intermediate to elimination and dimerization compounds
(Bamford-Stevens reaction).13 To our delight, we observed
the formation of corresponding sulfones in good yields when
tosyl hydrazones were heated in the presence of copper salt
and base. Although pyrolysis14 and photolysis15 of tosyl
hydrazones have been reported to obtain sulfones, these
results were not satisfactory, and very poor yields were
observed with limited substrate scope. Che and co-workers
have reported that sulfones were formed as byproducts in
ruthenium(II) porphyrin-catalyzed cyclopropanation of alk-
enes with tosylhydrazones.16 Nevertheless, only some special
substrates can provide sulfones, and precious metal Ru was
used. In recent years, copper salts as economical metal
compounds led to remarkable progress in the development
NaOMe
KOtBu
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
K2CO3
9
10
11
12
13c
14d
Cu(OAc)2. H2O
CuCl2
CuI
55
36
84
CuI
a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.3 mmol), [Cu] (20 mol %), ligand (20 mol
%), base (2 equiv), solvent (2 mL), 110 °C, 2 h, under air. b Isolated yields.
c 80 °C. d Under N2.
copper(I) iodide was used as copper source, and a variety
of ligands, bases, and solvents were then screened. Reactions
were inhibited to some extent after the addition of ligand
(proline, bipyridine, or TMEDA, entries 2-4). CuI alone
gave the best results, in which the yield was up to 84% (entry
5). Only a trace amount of target product 2a was observed
in the absence of either copper salt or base (entries 1 and
6). Thus, both copper salt and base are crucial for this
transformation. Increase of the basicity of basic salts led to
a harsh decrease of yields. When NaOMe and KOtBu were
used as bases, decreased yields of 46% and trace were
obtained, respectively (entries 7 and 8). The employment of
some alternate solvents (DMSO and toluene, entries 9 and
10) and copper salts (Cu(II) acetate and Cu(II) chloride,
(7) (a) Cheung, W. H.; Zheng, S. L.; Yu, W. Y.; Zhou, G. C.; Che,
C. M. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2535. (b) Cuevas-Yanez, E.; Serrano, J. M.; Huerta,
G.; Muchowski, J. M.; Cruz-Almanza, R. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 9391. (c)
Aller, E.; Brown, D. S.; Cox, G. G.; Miller, D. J.; Moody, C. J. J. Org.
Chem. 1995, 60, 4449.
(8) (a) Aggarwal, V. K.; de Vicente, J.; Bonnert, R. V. Org. Lett. 2001,
3, 2785. (b) Adams, L. A.; Aggarwal, V. K.; Bonnert, R. V.; Bressel, B.;
Cox, R. J.; Shepherd, J.; de Vicente, J.; Walter, M.; Whittingham, W. G.;
Winn, C. L. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 9433.
(9) (a) Aggarwal, V. K.; Harvey, J. N.; Richardson, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 5747. (b) Aggarwal, V. K.; Bae, I.; Lee, H. Y.; Richardson,
J.; Williams, D. T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3274. (c) Aggarwal,
V. K.; Charmant, J.; Dudin, L.; Porcelloni, M.; Richardson, J. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 5467. (d) Aggarwal, V. K.; Winn, C. L. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 611.
(10) (a) Aggarwal, V. K.; Ferrara, M.; O’Brien, C. J.; Thompson, A.;
Jones, R. V. H.; Fieldhouse, R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 1635.
(b) Aggarwal, V. K.; Alonso, E.; Fang, G. Y.; Ferrara, M.; Hynd, G.;
Porcelloni, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1433. (c) Aggarwal, V. K.;
Vasse, J. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3987.
(17) (a) Evans, D. A.; Scheidt, K. A.; Johnston, J. N.; Willis, M. C.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 4480. (b) Chen, X.; Hao, X. S.; Goodhue,
C. E.; Yu, J. Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6790. (c) Ma, D. W.; Cai,
Q. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1450. (d) Shibasaki, M.; Kanai, M. Chem.
ReV. 2008, 108, 2853. (e) Surry, D. S.; Buchwald, S. L. Chem. Sci. 2010,
1, 13.
(11) Barluenga, J.; Toma´s-Gamasa, M.; Aznar, F.; Valde´s, C. Nat. Chem.
2009, 1, 433.
(12) Barluenga, J.; Toma´s-Gamasa, M.; Aznar, F.; Valde´s, C. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 4993.
(18) (a) Maier, T. C.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 4594. (b)
Zhu, S. F.; Chen, C.; Cai, Y.; Zhou, Q. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008,
47, 932. (c) Mazet, C.; Kohler, V.; Pfaltz, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005,
44, 4888. (d) Martin, C.; Belderrain, T. R.; Perez, P. J. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2009, 7, 4777. (e) Fraile, J. M.; Garcia, J. I.; Mayoral, J. A.; Roldan, M.
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 731.
(13) Bamford, W. R.; Stevens, T. S. J. Chem. Soc. 1952, 4735.
(14) Henry, R. A.; Moore, D. W. J. Org. Chem. 1967, 32, 4145.
(15) Lemal, D. M.; Fry, A. J. J. Org. Chem. 1964, 29, 1673.
(16) Zhang, J. L.; Chan, P. W. H.; Che, C. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003,
44, 8733.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 19, 2010
4409