ortho-Phenylenes
A R T I C L E S
secondary structures: unlike the rod-like p-phenylenes, o-
phenylenes have the potential for a rich conformational behavior,
as the backbone can assume a variety of distinct conformational
states due to hindered rotation and torsional biases about the
biaryl bonds. In principle, this could lead to intractable mixtures
of random, slowly interconverting conformers. However, ex-
tensive studies of the poly(2,3-quinoxaline)s have established
that they adopt an extended helical conformation both in solution
and in the solid state.11 The o-phenylenes themselves have
received much less attention, but Simpkins’ study does include
a crystal structure of an o-phenylene hexamer that establishes
a compact helical conformation.12
compared to typical conjugated architectures, including a
surprisingly long effective conjugation length as measured by
UV/vis spectroscopy and a hypsochromic shift in fluorescence
spectra with increasing length. These results are discussed in
the context of the secondary structure of the oligomers and ab
initio calculations of their frontier molecular orbitals.
Even if o-phenylenes do not exhibit extensive through-bond
delocalization, we reasoned that they still have considerable
potential as functional organic nanostructures (e.g., in terms of
charge or energy transport). For example, Mu¨llen-type polyphe-
nylene dendrimers have been used to spatially organize chro-
mophores for efficient energy transport,13 and interarene elec-
tronic interactions within the dendritic arms have been
demonstrated despite high bond torsions.14 Porous polyphe-
nylene frameworks have also recently been shown to undergo
efficient energy transfer.15 Further, DNA has attracted consider-
able attention as a charge-transport medium,16 even though the
UV/vis spectrum of an extended DNA polymer is essentially a
superposition of the spectra of the constituent bases,17 implying
limited ground-state conjugation. It is the spatial organization
of the chromophores that makes these materials interesting.
Analogously, the o-phenylene architecture may provide a
convenient means to organize chromophores into dense arrays.
If the secondary structure of o-phenylenes is well-defined and
can be established and controlled, then they may exhibit
interesting through-space interactions between aromatic mono-
mers. Ultimately, we believe these systems may be relevant as
novel approaches to molecular wires and also as models for
transport phenomena in DNA, organic thin films, and π-stacked
columnar aggregates.
Nevertheless, very few well-characterized examples of o-
phenylenes have been synthesized, and very little is known of
their conformational behavior and electronic structure. Here we
present a robust synthetic approach to monodisperse o-phenylene
oligomers, which we have demonstrated by synthesizing the
homologous series oPn up to the dodecamer. This is significantly
longer than previously reported o-phenylenes, which has allowed
us to observe systematic changes in electronic properties as a
function of the number of arene repeat units (n). We have found
that the oPn series exhibits several very unusual properties
Results
Synthesis. In general, the synthesis of monodisperse oligomers
requires bifunctional monomers in which the reactivity of at
least one reactive group can be controlled.18 In Simpkins’
original synthesis of o-phenylenes, this was accomplished by
taking advantage of the greater reactivity of aryl iodides,
compared to aryl bromides, toward Suzuki-Miyaura coupling;
however, only low yields were obtained for the higher oligo-
mers.12 For our series, we wished to apply recent developments
in iterative oligo(phenylene) synthesis via Suzuki-Miyaura
coupling.19 In our hands, methods19a,b based on the deactivation
of the boronic acid were unsuccessful in the synthesis of oPn,
due to undesired side reactions or difficulties in purifying and
characterizing the resulting sterically hindered products. How-
ever, Manabe’s approach based on the use of phenols as masked
triflates, which they had demonstrated with the synthesis of an
o-phenylene pentamer,19c was readily applied to the synthesis
of the oPn series.
We based our synthesis on 9,10-boroxarophenanthrene de-
rivative 1, as it allowed two arene units to be added in a single
step, and because the desired substitution pattern was readily
installed. Similar boroxarenes have previously been shown to
undergo Suzuki-Miyaura coupling.20 Traditionally, these com-
pounds have been prepared by treatment of the appropriate
2-hydroxybiphenyl with BCl3;21 however, we found it conve-
nient to prepare monomer 1 from readily available 2,2′-dibromo-
5,5′-dimethoxybiphenyl22 via a series of metal-halogen ex-
changes, as shown in Scheme 1.
(11) (a) Ito, Y.; Ihara, E.; Murakami, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112,
6446–6447. (b) Ito, Y.; Ihara, E.; Murakami, M. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1992, 31, 1509–1510. (c) Ito, Y.; Miyake, T.; Hatano, S.;
Shima, R.; Ohara, T.; Suginome, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
11880–11893. (d) Ito, Y.; Ohara, T.; Shima, R.; Suginome, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9188–9189. (e) Suginome, M.; Collet, S.; Ito,
Y. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 351–354.
With monomer 1 in hand, the synthesis of the oPn series was
carried out according to Scheme 2. Suzuki-Miyaura coupling
of 1 with 4-iodoanisole using Buchwald’s SPhos catalyst23 gave
trimer oP3-OH, which was then activated toward further
(12) Blake, A. J.; Cooke, P. A.; Doyle, K. J.; Gair, S.; Simpkins, N. S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 9093–9096.
(18) Franz, N.; Kreutzer, G.; Klok, H.-A. Synlett 2006, 1793–1815.
(19) (a) Noguchi, H.; Hojo, K.; Suginome, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 758–759. (b) Gillis, E. P.; Burke, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 6716–6717. (c) Ishikawa, S.; Manabe, K. Chem. Lett. 2006, 35,
164–165.
(13) (a) Weil, T.; Reuther, E.; Mu¨llen, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002,
41, 1900–1904. (b) Bauer, R. E.; Grimsdale, A. C.; Mu¨llen, K. Top.
Curr. Chem. 2005, 245, 253–286.
(14) Liu, D. J.; De Feyter, S.; Cotlet, M.; Stefan, A.; Wiesler, U.-M.;
Herrmann, A.; Grebel-Koehler, D.; Qu, J.; Mu¨llen, K.; De Schryver,
F. C. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 5918–5925.
(20) Zhou, Q. J.; Worm, K.; Dolle, R. E. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5147–
5149.
(21) (a) Dewar, M.; Dietz, R. J. Chem. Soc. 1960, 1344–1347. (b) Greig,
L. M.; Kariuki, B. M.; Habershon, S.; Spencer, N.; Johnston, R. L.;
Harris, K. D. M.; Philp, D. New J. Chem. 2002, 26, 701–710.
(22) Campbell, N.; Scott, A. H. J. Chem. Soc. C 1966, 1050–1052.
(23) Walker, S. D.; Barder, T. E.; Martinelli, J. R.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1871–1876.
(15) Chen, L.; Honsho, Y.; Seki, S.; Jiang, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
132, 6742–6748.
(16) Porath, D.; Cuniberti, G.; Di Felice, R. Top. Curr. Chem. 2004, 237,
183–227.
(17) Eisinger, J.; Shulman, R. G. Science 1968, 161, 1311–1319.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 39, 2010 13849