A. Alker et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 4521–4525
7. Osapay, G.; Osapay, K. Expert Opin. Ther. Patent 1998, 8, 855.
4525
X-Ray
8. Kumar, U.; Sasi, R.; Suresh, S.; Patel, A.; Thangaraju, M.; Metrakos, P.; Patel, S.
C.; Patel, Y. C. Diabetes 1999, 48, 77.
9. Mitra, S. W.; Mezey, E.; Hunyady, B.; Chamberlain, L.; Hayes, E.; Foor, F.; Wang,
Y.; Schonbrunn, A.; Schaeffer, J. M. Endocrinology 1999, 140, 3790.
10. Portela-Gomes, G. M.; Stridsberg, M.; Grimelius, L.; Oberg, K.; Janson, E. T. Appl.
Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. 2000, 8, 126.
11. Strowski, M. Z.; Blake, A. D. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2008, 286, 169.
12. Wolkenberg, S. E.; Thut, C. J. Curr. Opin. Drug Disc. Dev. 2008, 11, 446.
13. Martin, R. E.; Green, L. G.; Guba, W.; Kratochwil, N.; Christ, A. J. Med. Chem.
2007, 50, 6291.
14. Martin, R. E.; Mohr, P.; Maerki, H. P.; Guba, W.; Kuratli, C.; Gavelle, O.; Binggeli,
A.; Bendels, S.; lvarez-Sanchez, R.; Alker, A.; Polonchuk, L.; Christ, A. D. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 6106.
15. Sprecher, U.; Mohr, P.; Martin, R. E.; Maerki, H. P.; Sanchez, R. A.; Binggeli, A.;
Kuennecke, B.; Christ, A. D. Regul. Pept. 2010, 159, 19.
16. A CHO cells stably expressing human SSTR5 (GenBank Accession No. D16827,
Euroscreen, Brussels, Belgium) was used for binding and functional assays;
cells expressing human SSTR1,
2 and 3, and rat and mouse SSTR5 were
established in-house. SST-14 was purchased from Bachem (Bubendorf,
Switzerland). Membranes from cells expressing SST receptors were prepared
by sonication and incubated with radiolabeled tracer (11 Tyr SST-14; Perkin-
Elmer, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland, or Amersham, Dübendorf, Switzerland)
and either test compound in varying concentration or, for the quantification of
non-specific binding, non-labeled SST-14. The incubation was stopped by
filtration through glass-fiber filters and the bound radioactivity measured to
estimate the concentration of test compound required for half maximal
inhibition of binding (IC50
) and the binding affinity (Ki). For functional
experiments, transfected cells were incubated with forskolin and test
compound in varying concentration. Subsequently, cellular cAMP
concentration was measured using a FRET (fluorescence resonance energy
transfer) based assay as previously published Roth, D.; Matile, H.; Josel, H.-P.;
Enderle, T. Fast-TRF: Novel time-resolved assays for drug discovery. In Society
for Biomolecular Screening, 11th Annual Conference and Exhibition, Geneva,
2005; p 265. The concentration of the test compound necessary to induce a half
maximal effect (EC50) and the efficacy compared to 0.15 nM SST-14 were
determined from concentration-versus-cAMP graphs. For the determination of
potential antagonism, 0.15 nM SST-14 was applied together with the test
compound, and the concentration of the test compound to half maximally
reverse the effect of SST-14 (i.e., IC50) was deduced from concentration-versus-
cAMP graphs.
X-ray structure of (S)-4-((S)-1-phenyl-ethylamino)-azepane-1-
carboxylic acid tert-butyl ester as p-Br-benzoate ((S,S)-10, only cat-
ion shown).
In conclusion, we have identified a novel series of highly potent,
selective SST5-antagonists, many of them showing single digit
nanomolar binding Ki-values. Compound 2Ai had been chosen,
thanks to its balanced overall profile, rather straightforward syn-
thetic access, and its favorable pharmacokinetic properties for an
exploratory in vivo study.15 Irrespective of its mixed outcome we
think that these molecules should become valuable tools for fur-
ther exploring and exploiting the SST receptors in general and
SST5 in particular as pharmacological target.
17. Mattson, R. J.; Pham, K. M.; Leuck, D. J.; Cowen, K. A. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55,
2552.
18. It proved to be advantageous to work in iPrOH instead of MeOH or EtOH in
order to suppress the formation of the benzyl–methyl- or benzyl–ethyl ether,
generated via hemiacetal formation of the corresponding benzaldehyde and
ensuing reduction.
19. Meciarova, M.; Podlesna, J.; Toma, S. Monatsh. Chem. 2004, 135, 419.
20. Roglans, A.; Marquet, J.; Moreno-Manas, M. Synth. Commun. 1992, 22, 1249.
21. Surivet, J.-P.; Zumbrunn, C.; Hubschwerlen, C.; Perez Frutos Hoener, A.
Application: WO 2004035569, 2004, 97 pp.
Acknowledgments
22. Data were collected on
a STOE Imaging Plate Diffraction System (STOE,
Darmstadt) with Mo-radiation (0.71 Å) and data processed with STOE
IPDSsoftware. The crystal structure was solved and refined with the program
SHELXTL (Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe). The coordinates of the structure of
compound (S,S)-10 have been deposited with the Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary publication numbers CCDC
775436. These data can be obtained, free of charge, on application to CCDC, 12
Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK [fax: +44 (0)1223 336033 or e-mail:
deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk].
The authors gratefully acknowledge Stefan Bürli and Thomas
Burger for chemical syntheses, Angele Costanzo and Astride Schno-
ebelen for in vitro testing, Dr. Christoph Ulmer for histamine
screening, and Virginie Micallef, Isabelle Parrilla, Frank Senner,
and Björn Wagner for physicochemical measurements.
23. Since our first seeding hit turned out to be Astemizole, a potent H1-antagonist,
we routinely checked all our SST5-antagonists for this putative off-target
effect.
References and notes
24. We spot-checked selected antagonists against SST2, SST3 as well as—to some
minor extent—against SST4 and never found any significant binding.
1. Brazeau, P.; Vale, W.; Burgus, R.; Ling, N.; Butcher, M.; Rivier, J.; Guillemin, R.
Science 1973, 179, 77.
2. Gillies, G. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1997, 18, 87.
3. Chisholm, C.; Greenberg, G. R. Am. J. Physiol. 2002, 283, E311.
4. Reisine, T.; Bell, G. I. Endocr. Rev. 1995, 16, 427.
5. Hoyer, D.; Bell, G. I.; Berelowitz, M.; Epelbaum, J.; Feniuk, W.; Humphrey, P. P.
A.; O’Carroll, A. M.; Patel, Y. C.; Schonbrunn, A., et al Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1995,
16, 86.
25. Knowing from our earlier series that 3-aminopyrrolidine is
a much less
favorable pharmacophore than 4-aminopiperidine we did not prepare and
screen the exact analogs of 2 or 20. To complement the picture, however, we
synthesized a couple of aminoazetidines which were found to be devoid of any
activity (see compound 13).
26. Most compounds, specifically 2Ba, 2Ab, 2Bd, 2Ae, 2Ag, 2Bh, 2Ah, 2Bi, 2Cj, 2Dk,
2Ei, 2Ai, 2Ak, 2Di, 2Dj, 2Aj, (RS)-20Ai were tested in a functional assay as
6. Pittaluga, A.; Feligioni, M.; Longordo, F.; Arvigo, M.; Raiteri, M. J. Pharmacol. Exp.
Ther. 2005, 313, 242.
described in Ref. 16 and were found to be devoid of any activity (EC50 >1 lM).