energy absorptions for all three compounds are almost the
same and very similar in both shape and energy to those of
acridinone (371, 389 nm). The lowest energy absorption can
be assigned as πfπ* transition.10 All three compounds
emitted in the deep blue region with the emission maximum
between 404 and 408 nm in dichloromethane. The quantum
yield measured in solution for ADBP is significantly lower
than those of the other two compounds. Triplet energies were
estimated to be 2.65-2.67 eV from the phosphorescent
spectra of the compounds measured in a frozen matrix in
toluene at 77 K, which indicate that all three compounds
can be used to sensitize triplet green emitters or even blue
green emitters. The oxidation and reduction potentials were
measured from their cyclic voltammograms. All three
compounds exhibited similar reduction potentials ranging
from 1.82 to 1.84 eV (vs SCE), indicating that they are
potentially electron-transporting materials. The oxidation
potential increases in the order of ADBP, ACBP, and DABP,
indicating the decreasing hole injection/transporting ability
of the molecules.
Further examination of the electronic properties by DFT
calculations was carried out on ADBP, ACBP, and DABP.
Optimized ground-state geometries revealed twisted struc-
tures for these molecules. The acridinone moiety and its
N-phenyl ring are nearly perpendicular to each other with
the torsional angle between 89.8° and 90.8° for the three
compounds. For ACBP, the torsional angle between the
carbazole and its N-phenyl ring is 57.1°. The two phenyl
rings of the biphenyl unit are twisted by 38.2°, 38.3°, and
41.0° in ADBP, ACBP, and DABP, respectively. These
structural features offer further explanation for the disruption
of the conjugation in the molecules. Calculated HOMO and
LUMO energies and triplet energies of the compounds are
listed in Table 1. The HOMO and LUMO characters are
shown in Figure 1. ADBP has clearly localized frontier
10(9H)-yl group as an electron-withdrawing group, since the
nitrogen would provide its lone pair to form an extended
conjugation within the acridinone moiety. Therefore, the
biphenyl in DABP becomes more electron-deficient. The
same argument is also applied to ACBP.
To evaluate new compounds as a host for triplet emitters
in phosphorescent OLED devices, we have chosen the
commonly used triplet green emitter Ir(ppy)3 for our device
fabrications. The OLED devices were fabricated by multi-
layer vapor deposition with the structure of indium tin
oxide(ITO)/NPB(75 nm)/TCTA(10 nm)/host + Ir(ppy)3 (6%)
(20 nm)/Bphen (50 nm)/LiF/Al. TCTA is used as the exciton-
blocking layer to prevent excitons generated by electroex-
citation from diffusing into the hole-transporting NPB layer.
LiF is used as the electron injection layer and Bphen (4,7-
diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline) as the electron-transporting
layer. The performance of the devices at 1 and 5 mA/cm2 is
summarized in Table 2 with the data obtained at 5 mA/cm2
listed on the right-hand column. All four devices emit
essentially the same color of green light that is from the
triplet dopant Ir(ppy)3. Several points are noteworthy by
comparing the performance of these devcies, for example,
at 1 mA/cm2. First, the drive voltage for devices with new
bipolar host ADBP (2.79 V) or ACBP (3.29 V) is substan-
tially lower than that for the device with CBP (4.16 V) or
DABP (3.99 V) as the host. Second, the efficiencies achieved
with new bipolar hosts ADBP (49.1 cd/A; 14.0% EQE) and
ACBP (58.9 cd/A; 16.9% EQE) are higher than those
obtained with CBP (40.5 cd/A; 11.6% EQE) or DABP (47
cd/A; 13.4% EQE) as the host. Third, as can be seen from
Table 2, the combination of both the improvement in
quantum efficiency and the reduction in the drive voltage
results in remarkably higher power efficiency. Both ADBP
(55.3 lm/W) and ACBP (56.2 lm/W) demonstrated around
80% and 50% increases in power efficiency when compared
to CBP and DABP, respectively. The performance at 5 mA/
cm2 shows the same trend but with a slight decrease in
efficiencies for all hosts.
The use of the bipolar materials as the host for singlet
emitters in OLED devices was also explored. By using
recently developed deep blue dopant, difluoro[6-mesityl-N-
(2(1H)-quinolinylidene-κN)-(6-mesityl-2-quinolinaminato-
κN1)]boron (BFD),11 the devices were fabricated with the
structure of ITO/NPB(75 nm)/TCTA(10 nm)/host + BFD
(1%) (20 nm)/Bphen (40 nm)/LiF/Al. The performances of
the devices with different hosts are shown in Table 2. The
(7) (a) Doi, H.; Kinoshita, M.; Okumoto, K.; Shirota, Y. Chem. Mater.
2003, 15, 10804. (b) Chen, C.-T.; Wei, Y.; Lin, J.-S.; Moturu, M. V. R. K.;
Chao, W.-S.; Tao, Y.-T.; Chien, C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 10992.
(c) Li, Z. H.; Wong, M. S.; Fukutani, H.; Tao, Y. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 427.
(d) Ge, Z.; Hayakawa, T.; Ando, S.; Ueda, M.; Akiike, T.; Miyamoto, H.;
Kajita, T.; Kakimoyo, M. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 421. (e) Lai, M.-Y.; Chen,
C.-H.; Huang, W.-S.; Lin, J.-T.; Ke, T.-H.; Chen, L.-Y.; Tsai, M.-H.; Wu,
C.-C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 581. (f) Tao, Y.; Wang, Q.; Yang,
C.; Zhang, Z.; Zou, T.; Qin, J.; Ma, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47,
810.
Figure 1. HOMO and LUMO surfaces from DFT calculations.
orbitals with HOMO localized in triphenylamine moiety and
LUMO in acridinone moiety. The HOMO and LUMO in
ACBP are less localized with HOMO predominately in
carbazolyl and the LUMO in the biphenyl moiety. Interest-
ingly, the HOMO in DABP are localized in the acridinone
moiety and the LUMO is localized in the biphenyl moiety.
This might be explained by considering the 9-oxoacridin-
(8) Buchwald, S. L.; Shafir, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8742.
(9) This compound was reported in a patent literature, but no charac-
terization was provided . Onikubo, S.; Enokida, T.; Suda, Y.; Toba, Y.;
Kimura, Y.; Kaneko, T. Jpn. Kokai Tokkyo Koho, JP2005089544A, 2005.
(10) Nikolov, P.; Petkova, I.; Ko¨hler, G.; Stojanov, S. J. Mol. Struct.
1998, 448, 247.
4312
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 19, 2009