Struct Chem (2010) 21:939–945
945
Acknowledgments The author is grateful to Dr. John R. Cable,
Bowling Green State University, Ohio, for providing the facility used
for this research.
barrier of 0.06 kcal/mol to such transition (TSeq in
Scheme 3). Therefore, only two conformers (2PIeq0 and
2PIax) of 2PI are expected to be observed in the supersonic
jet experiments. However, the most intriguing aspect of
this study appears to be the absence of 2PIeq0 in the
supersonic jet expansion. It has been observed that barriers
to conformational interconversions in a supersonic jet can
be surmounted if the barriers are less than 2kT [14]. Where
k is the Boltzmann constant; T is the pre-expansion tem-
perature (383 K for 2PI and 298 K for 2MI). The computed
barrier to axial–equatorial interconversion in 2PI (TSax-eq
in Scheme 3) is 1.68 kcal/mol above the 2PIeq0 local
minimum. This barrier is about the same as 2kT (1.52 kcal/
mol) of 2PI. Meanwhile, the barrier to axial–equatorial
interconversion in 2MI (TSax-eq in Scheme 2) is 2.33 kcal/
mol above the 2MIeq minimum. Thus, the barrier in 2MI is
substantially larger than 2kT (1.16 kcal/mol) of 2MI. The
lower barrier in 2PI can be attributed to the higher stabi-
lizing effect of the Csp2–H/p interactions in the transition
state of 2PI (TSax-eq in Scheme 3) than in the transition
state of 2MI (TSax-eq in Scheme 2). Therefore, conforma-
tional relaxation of the equatorial isomers of 2PI occurs
because of the high pre-expansion temperatures and rela-
tively low barrier to axial–equatorial interconversion.
References
1. Shibasaki K, Fujii A, Mikami N, Tsuzuki S (2007) J Phys Chem
A 111:753
2. Iga H, Isozaki T, Suzuki T, Ichimura T (2007) J Phys Chem A
111:5981
3. Isozaki T, Iga H, Suzuki T, Ichimura T (2007) J Chem Phys
126:214304
4. Tsuzuki S, Honda K, Uchimaru T, Mikami M, Fujii A (2006)
J Phys Chem A 110:10163
5. Zwier TS (1996) Annu Rev Phys Chem 47:205
6. Al-Saadi AA, Wagner M, Laane J (2006) J Phys Chem A
110:12292
7. Das A, Mahato KK, Panja SS, Chakraborty T (2003) J Chem
Phys 119:2523
8. Morita S, Fujii A, Mikami N, Tsuzuki S (2006) J Phys Chem A
110:10583
9. Panja SS, Chakraborty T (2003) J Chem Phys 118:6200
10. Hopkins JB, Powers DE, Smalley RE (1980) J Chem Phys
72:5039
11. Im HS, Bernstein ER, Secor HV, Seeman JI (1991) J Am Chem
Soc 113:4422
12. Arp Z, Meinander N, Choo J, Laane J (2002) J Chem Phys
116:6648
13. Barbu-Debus KL, Lahmani F, Zehnacker-Rentien A, Guchhait N,
Panja SS, Chakraborty T (2006) J Chem Phys 125:174305
14. Ottaviania P, Velinob B, Caminati W (2006) J Mol Struct
795:194
Conclusions
15. Finley JP, Cable JR (1993) J Phys Chem 97:4595
16. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA,
Cheeseman JR, Montgomery JAJR, Vreven T, Kudin KN, Burant
JC, Millam JM, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Barone V, Mennucci B,
Cossi M, Scalmani G, Rega N, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Hada
M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M,
Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Klene M, Li X, Knox
JE, Hratchian HP, Cross JB, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R,
Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C,
Ochterski JW, Ayala PY, Morokuma K, Voth GA, Salvador P,
Dannenberg JJ, Zakrzewski VG, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Strain
MC, Farkas O, Malick DK, Rabuck AD, Raghavachari K,
Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cui Q, Baboul AG, Clifford S,
Cioslowski J, Stefanov BB, Liu G, Liashenko A, Piskorz P,
Komaromi I, Martin RL, Fox DJ, Keith T, Al-Laham MA, Peng
CY, Nanayakkara A, Challacombe M, Gill PMW, Johnson B,
Chen W, Wong MW, Gonzalez C, Pople JA (2003) Gaussian 03,
Revision B.03. Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT
17. Wiberg KB, Castejon H, Bailey WF, Ochterski J (2000) J Org
Chem 65:1181
Both axial (2MIax) and equatorial (2MIeq) conformers of
2MI have been observed. A 2MIeq/2MIax conformer ratio
of 2.3 was estimated at 298 K, leading to the energy dif-
ference, DE ¼ E2MI ꢀ E2MI , of 0.49 kcal/mol. Only the
ax
eq
axial conformer of 2PI was observed in the supersonic jet
expansion. The equatorial conformers of 2PI relax to the
more stable axial conformer because of the high pre-
expansion temperatures and relatively low barrier to axial–
equatorial interconversion. The barrier to axial–equatorial
interconversion in 2MI is high enough to prevent confor-
mational relaxation at the pre-expansion temperature of
298 K. The results of this study show that intramolecular
C–H/p interactions are more important in determining the
conformational stability of 2PI than 2MI. This can be
attributed to the higher acidity of the Csp2–H bond
(pKa * 44) than that of Csp3–H bond (pKa * 50). The
S1 / S0 and S2 / S0 transitions of 2PI are found to be
completely localized on the indan and phenyl chromoph-
ores, respectively, suggesting that the phenyl and indan
rings of 2PI are perpendicular to each other.
18. Walter JB, Ram SR (1994) Can J Phys 72:1225
19. Sotoyama W, Sato H, Matsuura A, Sawatari N (2006) J Mol
Struct 759:165
123