shown that substitution at C11 and C12 of the tether in
cycloaddition precursor 5 (Figure 2) allows for predictable
Figure 1. Retrosynthetic analysis.
precursor incorporating a highly elaborated and functionally
differentiated BC bicyclic core.
Our synthetic plan (Figure 1) was designed to access
various 12-hydroxydaphnetoxin derivatives through late-stage
variation of the C12-ester and orthoester precursor groups
in advanced intermediate 1. This tricycle would arise from
Pd-catalyzed cyclization of enyne 2, which in turn would
come from the BC-bicyclic system 3. This intermediate
represents a potentially general daphnane precursor, incor-
porating several target stereocenters and differentiated,
conformationally biased functionality suitable for introduc-
tion of the A-ring and other groups. This bicycle would
emerge from the D-ribose-derived pyranone 4 by an oxi-
dopyrylium [5 + 2] cycloaddition.5
The oxidopyrylium-alkene [5 + 2] cycloaddition, a highly
effective strategy level reaction,6 has been successfully
utilized by our group7 as well as others5,8 in synthesis.
Asymmetric versions have also been reported in the litera-
ture.9 Of relevance to the current study, we have previously
Figure 2. Previous examples of stereoselective intramolecular
oxidopyrylium-alkene [5 + 2] cycloaddition.
control over the formation of the C6, C8, and C9 stereo-
centers in cycloadduct 6, an intermediate in the synthesis of
phorbol.7a,e This selectivity was also observed in the cy-
cloaddition of 7 to give the C11-, C13-, and C14-substituted
precursor 8 to resiniferatoxin.3 More recently, Trivedi and
co-workers reported an elegant enantiodivergent approach
toward simpler systems (10) incorporating C11, C12, and
C13 substituents derived from D-ribose.9e,f We herein report
our progress on the first stereoselective intramolecular
cycloaddition using fully substituted tethers, which provides
access to the fully functionalized C-ring of 12-hydroxydaph-
netoxins. The effect of protecting groups and solvent on the
diastereoselectivity of the cycloaddition are also described.
Our synthesis starts with conversion of the commercially
available chiral building block D-ribose to the known
aldehyde 12 (Scheme 1).10 Following the literature procedure,
selective protection of D-ribose and primary iodide formation
proceeded well (Scheme 1). However, subsequent zinc-
mediated Vasella fragmentation11 of 11 using the literature
protocol with methanol as the solvent gave a large amount
of the methyl hemiacetal side product as reported. We found
that the use of a catalytic amount of acetic acid in THF/
ethanol provides a more selective route to the desired
aldehyde 12. Treatment of 12 with EtMgBr followed by
TPAP oxidation afforded ethyl ketone 13. The C11 stereo-
center was then set selectively by using a boron-mediated
substrate-controlled aldol reaction12 between ketone 13 and
known furfuryl aldehyde 19,7e providing hydroxy ketone 14
(5) For reviews, see: (a) Elitzin, V. I. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University,
Stanford, CA, 2005, pp 50-96. (b) Sammes, P. G. Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1986,
116, 109-114. (c) Ohkata, K.; Akiba, K.-Y. AdV. Heterocycl. Chem. 1996,
65, 283-374. (d) Chiu, P.; Lautens, M. Top. Curr. Chem. 1997, 190, 1-85.
(e) Mascaren˜as, J. L. AdV. Cycloaddit. 1999, 6, 1-54.
(6) For a definition and example, see: Wender, P. A.; Ternansky, R. J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 22, 2625-2628.
(7) For synthetic applications of oxidopyrylium-alkene cycloadditions
from this laboratory, see: (a) Wender, P. A.; Lee, H. Y.; Wilhelm, R. S.;
Williams, P. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8954-8957. (b) Wender, P.
A.; Kogen, H.; Lee, H. Y.; Munger, J. D.; Wilhelm, R. S.; Williams, P. D.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8957-8958. (c) Wender, P. A.; McDonald,
F. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 4956-4958. (d) Wender, P. A.;
Mascaren˜as, J. L. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 6267-6269. (e) Wender, P. A.;
Rice, K. D.; Schnute, M. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7897-7898.
(8) For recent examples, see: (a) Magnus, P.; Shen, L. Tetrahedron 1999,
55, 3553-3560. (b) Magnus, P.; Waring, M. J.; Ollivier, C.; Lynch, V.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4947-4950. (c) Ohmori, N. Chem. Commun.
2001, 1552-1553. (d) Lopez, F.; Castedo, L.; Mascaren˜as, J. L. Chem.
Eur. J. 2002, 8, 884-899. (e) Baldwin, J. E.; Mayweg, A. V. W.; Pritchard,
G. J.; Adlington, R. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 4543-4545. (f) Snider,
B. B.; Grabowski, J. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 823-825.
(9) (a) Ohmori, N.; Yoshimura, M.; Ohkata, K. Heterocycles 1997, 45,
2097-2100. (b) Lo´pez, F.; Castedo, L.; Mascaren˜as, J. L. Org. Lett. 2001,
3, 623-625. (c) Lo´pez, F.; Castedo, L.; Mascaren˜as, J. L. Org. Lett. 2002,
4, 3683-3685. (d) Lo´pez, F.; Castedo, L.; Mascaren˜as, J. L. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 68, 9780-9786. (e) Krishna, U. M.; Srikanth, G. S. C.; Trivedi, G.
K.; Deodhar, K. D. Synlett 2003, 2383-2385. (f) Krishna, U. M.; Deodhar,
K. D.; Trivedi, G. K. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 4829-4836.
(10) Paquette, L. A.; Bailey, S. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 7849-7856.
(11) Bernet, B.; Vasella, A. HelV. Chim. Acta 1979, 62, 1990-2016.
5374
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 23, 2006