S. Matsuoka et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 4644–4647
4647
yses of the peptides and the parent polytheonamides are currently
underway in our laboratory.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by Grant-in-Aids for Young
Scientists (S) to M.I., and Grant-in-Aids for Young Scientists (start
up) to S.M.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
Figure 2. CD spectra of 14 and 15 recorded at room temperature in CH3CN/H2O
(10:1) at concentrations of 0.1 mM (A) and 1 mM (B).
1. Hamada, T.; Sugawara, T.; Matsunaga, S.; Fusetani, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35,
719.
2. Hamada, T.; Sugawara, T.; Matsunaga, S.; Fusetani, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35,
609.
3. Hamada, T.; Matsunaga, S.; Yano, G.; Fusetani, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
110.
unchanged at higher concentrations (1 mM, Fig. 2B), the peak at
213 nm in 15 was diminished. It clearly suggests that 15 undergoes
conformational change in
a concentration-dependent fashion,
4. Chakrabarti, P.; Pal, D. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2001, 76, 1.
5. Pal, D.; Chakrabarti, P. Acta Crystallogr., D 2000, 56, 589.
6. Inoue, M.; Shinohara, N.; Takahashi, T.; Tanabe, S.; Mizoguchi, Y.; Okura, K.;
Itoh, H.; Iida, M.; Lee, N.; Matsuoka, S. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 280.
7. Dado, G. P.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 12609.
8. Bitan, G.; Tarus, B.; Vollers, S. S.; Lashuel, H. A.; Condron, M. M.; Straub, J. E.;
Teplow, D. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 15359.
9. Schenck, H. L.; Dado, G. P.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 12487.
10. Garcia-Echeverria, C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1996, 6, 229.
11. Watson, A. A.; Fairlie, D. P.; Craik, D. J. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 12700.
12. Valluzzi, R.; Szela, S.; Avtges, P.; Kirschner, D.; Kaplan, D. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999,
103, 11382.
13. Ciorba, M. A.; Heinemann, S. H.; Weissbach, H.; Brot, N.; Hoshi, T. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94, 9932.
14. For reviews, see: (a) Davies, M. J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1703, 93; (b)
Hoshi, T.; Heinemann, S. H. J. Physiol. 2001, 531.1, 1; (c) Vogt, W. Free Radical
Biol. Med. 1995, 18, 93.
15. Saito, B.; Katsuki, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 3873.
16. Olah, G. A.; Vankar, Y. D.; Arvanaghi, M. Synthesis 1979, 984.
17. Trost, B. M.; Curran, D. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 1287.
18. Kaliszan, R.; Harber, P.; Baczek, T.; Siluk, D.; Valko, K. J. Chromatogr., A 2002,
965, 117.
19. Braumann, T. J. Chromatogr. 1986, 373, 191.
20. Chan, W. C.; White, P. D. Fmoc Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis—A Practical
Approach; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2000.
most likely due to aggregation. This is consistent with the fact that
15 is more hydrophobic than 14. Therefore, starkly different behav-
iors of 14 and 15 observed by 1H NMR, CD spectra, and the hemo-
lysis assay appear to originate in the different aggregation states of
14 and 15.
Sulfoxides are known as strong hydrogen bond acceptors due to
their substantial dipole moments.24–26 The sulfoxide stereochemis-
try defines the orientation of its S+–Oꢁ bond and confers the geom-
etry of the hydrogen bond. Based on our results, it is highly likely
that the chirality of sulfoxides in 14 and 15 serves as a controlling
structural element at least at two levels; it controls the overall
molecular shape by introducing intramolecular hydrogen bonds,
thereby controlling the hydrophobicities, and it controls aggrega-
tion of the peptides. Peptide 15 with (SS)-sulfoxide promotes
aggregation through increased hydrophobicity,27 whereas peptide
14 with (SR)-sulfoxide disfavors aggregation, which is apparently
critical in exerting its hemolytic activity.
In conclusion, we synthesized protected amino acids and model
hexapeptides containing sulfide (
Me2Met(O), and -(SS)-Me2Met(O)], or sulfone [
eties. The (SR)- and (SS)-stereochemistries of -Me2Met(O) were ste-
L-Me2Met), sulfoxides [L-(SR)-
21. Kuroda, K.; Caputo, G. A.; DeGrado, W. F. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 1123.
22. Fujisawa, S.; Imai, Y.; Kojima, K.; Masuhara, E. J. Dent. Res. 1978, 57, 98.
23. In contrast to these data, the 1H NMR chemical shifts of two protected amino
L
L-Me2Met(O2)] moi-
L
acids
9 and 10 were almost identical in the amide proton region. See
reoselectively introduced by asymmetric oxidation of the sulfide.
Spectral and biological analyses using model hexapeptides proved
that the one stereochemical perturbation of the sulfoxide of the L-
Me2Met(O) moiety has an important structural role in controlling
the overall physicochemical and therefore functional properties
of the model hexapeptides. Further structural and biological anal-
Supplementary data for detail.
24. Jiang, L.; Burgess, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9028.
25. Wieland, T.; Götzendörfer, C.; Dabrowski, J.; Lipscomb, W. N.; Shoham, G.
Biochemistry 1983, 22, 1264.
26. Furukawa, N.; Fujihara, H. In The Chemistry of Sulphones and Sulphoxides; Patai,
S., Rappoport, Z., Stirling, C. J. M., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1988; p 541.
27. Hill, R. B.; DeGrado, W. F. Structure 2000, 8, 471.