report a complementary rhodium-catalyzed regioselective
amination of secondary allylic trichloroacetimidates 1. In
contrast to other known methods,2a,b our reaction conditions
are feasible with acyclic secondary anilines and R-substituted
allylic substrates.
product in poor yield and with 10:1 regioselectivity.3 Under
iridium conditions, reaction of allylic carbonate with 13a
provided the products with 13:1 regioselectivity.2d
With the initial optimal conditions in hand, a variety of
aniline derivatives 13a-f were investigated with allylic
trichloroacetimidates 4-6 (Table 2). The branched N-
The Rh-catalyzed regioselective amination reaction was
optimized by changing the reaction parameters (Table 1).
Table 2. Rh-Catalyzed Amination with Anilines 13a-f
Table 1. Optimization of Rh-Catalyzed Amination of Allylic
Trichloroacetimidate 4 with Aniline 13a
Rh
P(OR)3 time
14/15
entry
Rh source
(mol %) P(OR)3 (mol %) (h) yielda ratiob
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
RhCl(PPh3)3
[RhCl(cyclooct)2]2
[RhCl(COD)2]2
[RhCl(ethylene)2]2
[RhCl(ethylene)2]2
[RhCl(ethylene)2]2
[RhCl(ethylene)2]2
[RhCl(ethylene)2]2
10
5
5
5
5
5
2
1
P(OMe)3
P(OMe)3
P(OMe)3
P(OMe)3
P(OiPr)3
P(OPh)3
P(OPh)3
P(OPh)3
20
20
20
20
20
20
8
24
24
24
7
13%
37%
39%
84%
23%
5:1
4:1
41:1
65:1
10:1
24
0.5 95% >99:1
0.5 95% >99:1
0.5 96% >99:1
4
a Reported based on GC purity of isolated products. b The ratio was
determined by GC in the crude reaction mixture.
Utilizing 10 mol % of Wilkinson’s catalyst modified with
trimethyl phosphite ligand (20 mol %)3 in the presence of
aniline nucleophile 13a (3 equiv) at 40 °C provided the
corresponding N-arylamines 14a and 15a in a combined 13%
yield, with 5:1 regioselectivity favoring the branched product
14a (entry 1). The branched product 14a was obtained in
higher yield and regioselectivity (65:1) in the presence of 5
mol % of [RhCl(ethylene)2]2 and 20 mol % of P(OMe)3
(entry 4). The use of a more sterically hindered ligand,
P(OiPr)3, was detrimental to the reaction (entry 5), while
use of a more electron-withdrawing ligand, P(OPh)3,7
significantly shortened the reaction time and improved both
the yield (84% f 95%) and regioselectivity (65:1 f 99:1)
(entry 6). Lowering the metal and ligand loadings further
did not diminish the yield or the regioselectivity (entries 7
and 8). Compared to other systems, this chemistry provides
the branched product such as 14a with higher regioselectivity.
For instance, reaction of allylic carbonate with 13a in the
presence of Wilkinson’s catalyst provided the branched
a Reported based on GC purity of isolated products. b The ratio was
determined by GC in the crude reaction mixture. c 5 mol % Rh and 20 mol
% P(OPh)3 at room temperature.
arylamines 14, 16, and 17 were obtained in good yield and
with excellent regioselectivity. Importantly, the Overman
rearrangement products 3 (Figure 1) were not observed in
these reactions. The observed reaction time for electron-
rich aniline 13c was longer than more electron-deficient
nucleophiles in the allylic amination reaction (entry 2).
This is likely due to the binding of rhodium metal to both
the nitrogen and oxygen groups of the product 14c,
resulting in slow turnover rates of the rhodium catalyst.
The current method is also feasible with sterically hindered
anilines 13d-f (entries 4-6). Reaction of 4 with second-
ary aniline 13f provided the N-arylamine 14f with 60:1
regioselectivity (entry 6). Under iridium conditions,2b
reaction of allylic carbonates with secondary anilines such
as 13f provided the products with poor regioselectivities
(1:1 f 4:1).
(3) Evans, P. A.; Robinson, J. E.; Nelson, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 6761.
(4) (a) Mercer, G. J.; Yang, J.; McKay, M. J.; Nguyen, H. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 11210. (b) Yang, J.; Cooper-Vanosdell, C.; Mensah,
E. A.; Nguyen, H. M. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 794. (c) Mensah, E. A.;
Nguyen, H. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8778.
(5) Fagnou, K.; Lautens, M. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2319.
(6) (a) Overman, L. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 597. For a
comprehensive review, see: (b) Overaman, L. E.; Carpenter, N. E. In
Organic Reactions; Overman, L. E., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weiheim, 2005; Vol.
66, pp 1-107.
(7) Tolman, C. A. Chem. ReV. 1977, 77, 313.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 20, 2010
4581