of a 4-methoxybenzyl- or methylnaphthyl (Nap) ether using
2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyanobenzoquinone (DDQ).11-15 The ether
can be present on the glycosyl donor or acceptor, the latter
being referred to as reverse tethering. In the second step,
the glycosyl donor is activated and the glycosyl acceptor is
forced to attack from the same face as the C-2′ tether leading
to the introduction of a 1,2-cis-glycoside with concomitant
loss of the C-2′ protecting group.
Monosaccharide building blocks 1-4 were prepared (see
Supporting Information) to explore the utility of IAD for
the synthesis of an orthogonal protected ꢀ-D-Man-(1f4)-
R-D-Man disaccharide (Scheme 1). It was envisaged that
Scheme 1
.
Intramolecular Aglycon Delivery using Acetal
Tethering
Figure 1. Target molecule and synthetic strategy. (A) Highly
branched hexasaccharide fragment isolated from F. tularensis LVS
lipopolysaccharide, target ꢀ-D-Man-(1f4)-R-D-Man disaccharide
highlighted in red. (B) Intramolecular aglycon delivery through
acetal tethering. (C) 4,6-Benzylidene mediated R-triflate formation
followed by SN2-like displacement.
to carrier proteins without destroying vital immunological
domains. Synthetic chemistry can address these issues since
it makes it possible to incorporate an artificial linker for
controlled conjugation to proteins. In addition, substructures
can be prepared to determine the minimal epitope required
to elicit protective immune responses.
Herein we report the chemical synthesis of a ꢀ-D-Man-
(1f4)-R-D-Man disaccharide that is functionalized with a
set of orthogonal protecting groups at C-1, C-2, C-2′ and
C-3′. The orthogonal protecting groups make it possible to
selectively introduce glycosides for the synthesis of a library
of F. tularensis oligosaccharides.5-8
To this end, two ꢀ-mannosylation strategies were explored
as well as a variety of orthogonal protecting group combina-
tions. ꢀ-Mannosides, which are an important class of 1,2-
cis glycosides, are difficult to introduce due to the axial C-2
substituent, which sterically blocks incoming nucleophiles
from the ꢀ-face and the ∆-anomeric effect, which provides
additional stabilization of the R-anomer.9,10 An elegant
methodology for the construction of ꢀ-mannosidic linkages
is based on intramolecular aglycon delivery (IAD), which
usually gives absolute ꢀ-anomeric selectivity. In this two-
step protocol, the glycosyl donor and acceptor are tethered
through a mixed acetal by for example oxidative coupling
compound 1, which is equipped with a methylnapthyl ether,
would provide a useful starting material to make tethered
derivative 5, which upon IAD should provide disaccharide
6. The resulting free hydroxyl at C-2′ of 6 can then
immediately be used for the introduction of the GalN of
the core region of F. Tularensis. It was expected that the
allyloxycarbonyl (Alloc), levulinoyl ester (Lev)16 and the
2-(trimethylsilyl)ethyl ether (SE)17 would provide an attrac-
tive set of orthogonal protecting groups for further glyco-
sylations.
Thus, a mixture of 1 and 3 in CH2Cl2 in the presence of
molecular sieves was treated with DDQ to afford mixed
acetal 5 in a moderate yield of 51% as a 10/1 mixture of
diastereoisomers (Scheme 1). The yield was significantly
improved when reverse tethering was employed using 2 and
4 to give 5 in 72% yield. Presumably, a higher yield is
obtained due to the higher nucleophilicity of the C-2′ alcohol.
Next, mixed acetal 5 was activated with methyl triflate in
the presence of 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylpyridine (DTBMP)
(5) Wong, C. H.; Ye, X. S.; Zhang, Z. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
(11) Jung, K. H.; Muller, M.; Schmidt, R. R. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100,
7137
.
4423.
(6) Zhu, T.; Boons, G. J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 199
(7) Markad, S. D.; Schmidt, R. R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 5002
(8) Wang, C. C.; Lee, J. C.; Luo, S. Y.; Kulkarni, S. S.; Huang, Y. W.;
Lee, C. C.; Chang, K. L.; Hung, S. C. Nature 2007, 446, 896
.
(12) Lee, Y. J.; Ishiwata, A.; Ito, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6330
(13) Boltje, T. J.; Buskas, T.; Boons, G. J. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 611
(14) Cumpstey, I. Carbohydr. Res. 2008, 343, 1553
(15) Zhu, X. M.; Schmidt, R. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1900
(16) van Boom, J. H.; Burgers, P. M. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 52,
.
.
.
.
.
.
(9) Gridley, J. J.; Osborn, H. M. I. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000,
1471
.
4875.
(10) Cai, F.; Wu, B. L.; Crich, D. AdV. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem.
2009, 62, 251
(17) Jansson, K.; Frejd, T.; Kihlberg, J.; Magnusson, G. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1986, 27, 753.
.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 20, 2010
4637