Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 9113–9115 9113
DOI: 10.1021/ic101513a
Ratiometric and Intensity-Based Zinc Sensors Built on Rhodol and
Rhodamine Platforms
Elisa Tomat and Stephen J. Lippard*
Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Received July 28, 2010
A xanthene-forming condensation reaction yields rhodol and
rhodamine dyes carrying a zinc-binding ligand that includes the
aniline-type nitrogen donor of the fluorophores. Upon zinc coordi-
nation in neutral aqueous solution, rhodol RF3 behaves as a
ratiometric sensor, and rhodamine RA1 acts as a turn-off intensity-
based indicator. Both fluorescent compounds bind the divalent zinc
cation with micromolar affinity.
sities at two chosen wavelengths corresponds to a specific
analyte concentration, which can be calculated from micro-
scopy data in dual excitation or dual emission experiments.
When compared to intensity-based systems, which respond
to zinc binding with a change in emission intensity, ratio-
metric sensors are preferred in bioimaging applications
because their detection is less sensitive to dye concentration,
sample thickness, and photobleaching.
For the construction of a novel ratiometric indicator, we
reexamined the asymmetric platform of rhodol (also known
as rhodafluor) dyes. These rhodamine-fluorescein hybrid
molecules retain several desirable properties of the parent
compounds, namely water solubility, brightness, and visible-
light excitability.15 The subject of recent synthetic investi-
gations,16,17 rhodols have been employed in metal ion
sensing. In order to elicit a ratiometric response, the coordi-
nating analyte should interact directly with the π-system
of the fluorophore, thereby affecting the energy levels that
are responsible for emissive transition(s). The nitrogen
donor of rhodol platforms has been incorporated in well-
established chelators, such as 1,2-bis(o-aminophenoxy)ethane-
N,N,N0,N0-tetracetic acid (BAPTA),18 1,4,7,10-tetraazacy-
clododecane (cyclen),19 and di(2-picolyl)amine (DPA).19
Whereas the BAPTA systems are ratiometric calcium sen-
sors, the DPA- and cyclen-based sensors (RF1 and RF2,
respectively, Chart 1) show little or no affinity for zinc and do
not exhibit ratiometric behavior.
In the present study, we modified the structure of RF1 to
increase its zinc affinity and to engineer a zinc-induced shift
of emission wavelength. A carboxylate moiety, negatively
charged in neutral aqueous solution, was introduced on the
DPA unit to increase zinc-binding affinity and to influence
the charge distribution of the sensor candidate RF3
(Chart 1). Coulombic interactions with the negative charge
on the carboxylate group were expected to stabilize a partial
positive charge on the nitrogen donor of the rhodol scaffold.
Bioinorganic research continues to unveil the critical and
often multifaceted roles of loosely bound metal ions, parti-
cularly late elements of the first transition series, in human
health.1-3 Discoveries about the (patho)physiology of these
metal ions both stimulate and benefit from research on
imaging techniques for biological specimens.4-7 In this con-
text, fluorescent probes for the spectroscopically silent zinc
ion contribute to the study of mobile zinc signals in numerous
biological settings,8-10 including the central nervous11 and
immune systems.12
Considerable effort has been devoted in recent years to the
development of fluorescent indicators for ratiometric detec-
tion of biological zinc.8,13,14 Probes of this type respond to
zinc coordination with a shift of their emission and/or
absorption profiles. As such, each ratio of measured inten-
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lippard@
mit.edu.
(1) Vallee, B. L.; Falchuk, K. H. Physiol. Rev. 1993, 73, 79–118.
(2) Adlard, P. A.; Bush, A. I. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2006, 10, 145–163.
(3) Lee, D. W.; Andersen, J. K. J. Neurochem. 2010, 112, 332–339.
(4) Que, E. L.; Domaille, D. W.; Chang, C. J. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1517–
1549.
(5) Domaille, D. W.; Que, E. L.; Chang, C. J. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2008, 4,
168–175.
(6) McRae, R.; Bagchi, P.; Sumalekshmy, S.; Fahrni, C. J. Chem. Rev.
2009, 109, 4780–4827.
(7) Vinkenborg, J. L.; Koay, M. S.; Merkx, M. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
2010, 14, 231–237.
(8) Tomat, E.; Lippard, S. J. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2010, 14, 225–230.
(9) Nolan, E. M.; Lippard, S. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 193–203.
(10) Xu, Z.; Yoon, J.; Spring, D. R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 1996–2006.
(11) Sensi, S. L.; Paoletti, P.; Bush, A. I.; Sekler, I. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.
2009, 10, 780–U38.
(12) Haase, H.; Rink, L. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2009, 29, 133–152.
(13) Gee, K. R.; Zhou, Z.-L.; Ton-That, D.; Sensi, S. L.; Weiss, J. H. Cell
Calcium 2002, 31, 245–251.
(15) Whitaker, J. E.; Haugland, R. P.; Ryan, D.; Hewitt, P. C.; Haugland,
R. P.; Prendergast, F. G. Anal. Biochem. 1992, 207, 267–279.
(16) Kamino, S.; Ichikawa, H.; Wada, S. I.; Horio, Y.; Usami, Y.;
Yamaguchi, T.; Koda, T.; Harada, A.; Shimanuki, K.; Arimoto, M.; Doi,
M.; Fujita, Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 4380–4384.
(17) Peng, T.; Yang, D. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 496–499.
(18) Smith, G. A.; Metcalfe, J. C.; Clarke, S. D. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2 1993, 1195–1204.
(19) Burdette, S. C.; Lippard, S. J. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 6816–6823.
(14) Carol, P.; Sreejith, S.; Ajayaghosh, A. Chem.;Asian J. 2007, 2, 338–
348.
r
2010 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 09/22/2010
pubs.acs.org/IC