C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 3. (a) Top and (b) side views of a single-crystal X-ray diffraction
structure of 1·TBA3HP2O7 ·3H2O in which the pyrophosphate anion is in
a space filling representation. Solvent molecules and TBA cations have been
omitted for clarity.
Figure 1. (a) Top and (b) side views of the single crystal X-ray structure
of 1·4CH3OH·H2O. All solvent molecules have been omitted for clarity.
the ring and are involved in hydrogen bond interactions with the
bound pyrophosphate guest, as inferred from bond distances (pyrrole
NH · · · O ca. 1.9 Å, triazole CH · · · O ca. 2.3 Å, benzene CH · · ·O
ca. 3.7 Å). The resulting conformation thus stands in contrast to
what is seen in the case of the free host 1.
In summary, the pyrrolyl-based receptor 1 has been prepared in
a moderate yield. It binds the pyrophosphate anion in the solid state
and displays a high selectivity for this trianion relative to various
test monoanions in chloroform solution. The present results thus
serve to underscore the utility of new recognition motifs in the
design of anion binding agents, particularly those that combine both
CH- and NH-anion interactions within a single framework. The
present work also helps calibrate directly the relative importance
of these interactions. It thus provides a foundation for future receptor
design.
Figure 2. 1H NMR spectra (aromatic region) of 1 recorded upon titration
with (TBA)3HP2O7; CDCl3, 300 K.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the National
Institutes of Health (Grant No. GM58907 to J.L.S.) and the National
Science Foundation (Grant Nos. 0749571 to J.L.S. and 0741973
for the X-ray diffractometer). B.P.H. acknowledges support from
the Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences,
Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. DOE at Oak Ridge National
Laboratory. Support under the WCU (World Class University)
program (R32-2008-000-10217-0) is also acknowledged.
> Cl- ((1.18 ( 0.07) × 104) > Br- ((2.64 ( 0.09) × 103) (all as
TBA salts; cf. SI). Macrocycle 1 thus displays a high pyrophosphate/
dihydrogenphosphate selectivity (Ka(HP2O73-)/Ka(H2PO4-) ) 10).
The host-guest interactions between macrocycle 1 and the
1
pyrophosphate anion were further analyzed by H NMR spectros-
copy. Specifically, a solution of 1 (5 mM, CDCl3) was titrated with
up to 10 equiv of TBA3HP2O7 (Figure 2). The hydrogen signals
for the pyrrole NH, the triazole CH, and the endocyclic hydrogen
atom of the N1-linked phenyl unit were seen to shift downfield by
5.09, 1.96, and 1.22 ppm, respectively (Figure 2). These changes
followed the sequence of expected H acidity, namely pyrrole NH
> triazole CH > benzene CH.14 Thus the trends observed in the
NMR spectral studies are consistent with the intrinsic strength of
the various H-bond donor groups as inferred from electronic
structure calculations carried out with chloride anion. Binding
energies (MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ) computed for complexes of chloride
with pyrrole N-H, triazole C-H, and benzene C-H donors are
-22.50, -18.94, and -8.42 kcal mol-1, respectively (cf. SI).15 They
are also consistent with the hydrogen bond distances observed in
the solid state (see below). Nevertheless, it is important to appreciate
that all three hydrogen bond donor motifs play a role in the observed
anion recognition. In contrast, only a small downfield shift was
seen for the signals ascribed to the exocyclic hydrogen atoms on
the phenyl and pyrrole rings (∆δ ) 0.09 and 0.10 ppm, respec-
tively); apparently these C-H bonds play little role in anion
recognition.
Supporting Information Available: Details describing the synthesis
and characterization of compounds 4 and 1, details of fitting binding
curves, details of electronic structure calculations, and crystallographic
data (CIF). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
References
(1) Mathews, C. P.; van Hold, K. E. Biochemistry; The Benjamin/Cummings
Publishing Company, Inc.: Redwood City, CA, 1990.
(2) Ronaghi, M.; Karamohamed, S.; Pettersson, B.; Uhle´n, M.; Nyre´n, P. Anal.
Biochem. 1996, 242, 84–89.
(3) Xu, S.; He, M.; Yu, H.; Cai, X.; Tan, X.; Lu, B.; Shu, B. Anal. Biochem.
2001, 299, 188–193.
(4) Saenger, W. Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure; Springer-Verlag: New
York, 1988.
(5) For review, see: (a) Sessler, J. L.; Gale, P. A.; Cho, W.-S. Anion Receptor
Chemistry; RSC Publishing: Cambridge, U.K., 2006. (b) Kim, S.-K.; Lee,
D.-H.; Hong, J.-I.; Yoon, J.-Y. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 23–31. For recent
reports, see: (c) Kumar, A.; Pandey, P. S. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 165–168.
(d) Chen, K.-H.; Liao, J.-H.; Chan, H.-Y.; Fang, J.-M. J. Org. Chem. 2009,
74, 895–898. (c) Xu, Z.; Singh, N. J.; Lim, J.; Pan, J.; Kim, H.-N.; Park,
S.-S.; Kim, K. S.; Yoon, J.-Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 15528–15533.
(6) Of the 18 426 559 molecules in PubChem (March 2008), 17 947 719 (97%)
contained one or more CH units. Li, Y.; Flood, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 12111–12122.
Additional support for the suggestion that both NH and neutral
CH interactions combine to effect pyrophosphate anion recognition
in the case of receptor 1 came from a single crystal X-ray diffraction
analysis of the complex formed between pyrophosphate and 1
(1·TBA3HP2O7 ·3H2O) (Figure 3). In this complex, the macrocycle
displays a folded conformation; this provides a clip-like slot into
which the pyrophosphate anion inserts. All the pyrrole NH, triazole
CH, and endocyclic benzene CH protons point into the center of
(7) (a) Bryantsev, V. S.; Hay, B. P. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5031–5034. (b)
Bryantsev, V. S.; Hay, B. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8282–8283. (c)
Li, Y.; Flood, A. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 2649–2652. (d)
Yoon, D. W.; Gross, D. E.; Lynch, V. M.; Sessler, J. L.; Hay, B. P.; Lee,
C.-H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 5038–5042. (e) Li, Y.; Pink, M.;
Karty, J. A.; Flood, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 17293–17295. (f)
Zhu, S. S.; Staats, H.; Brandhorst, K.; Grunenberg, J.; Gruppi, F.; Dalcanale,
E.; Lu¨tzen, A.; Rissanen, K.; Schalley, C. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008,
47, 788–792. (g) Juwarker, H.; Lenhardt, J. M.; Pham, D. M.; Craig, S. L.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3740–3743. (h) Meudtner, R. M.; Hecht,
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 40, 2010 14059