P. Xu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 5527–5531
5531
Table 1
In vitro antibacterial activities of compounds 7a–f and 13–16
Pathogens
MIC (lg/mL)
S. aureus ATCC 29213
S. aureus BK2464
S. epidermidis MRSE-1
S. pneumoniae ERSP-2
S. pyogenes 8902
S. pyogenes ERSPy-1
Clarithromycin
Telithromycin
0.25
0.125
>16
>16
>16
16
>32
>32
>16
>16
>16
>16
>16
>16
>16
>16
>16
>16
16
0.125
16
>16
16
16
16
0.125
16
16
16
8
16
16
8
32
0.25
16
>16
16
16
16
>16
16
4
2
0.25
16
16
8
8
1
>16
16
0.5
8
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
7f
13
14
15
16
16
16
>16
>16
4
>16
4
>16
>16
4
>16
4
2
8
1
16
8
2
not, the compounds were inactive against either susceptible or
resistant strains.
Special Project on Major New Drug Innovation (2008ZX09401-
004 and 2009ZX09301-003).
Among compounds 13–16, no improvement in antibacterial
activity could be detected when an additional 11,12-carbamate
substructure with an aryl–alkyl side chain was introduced. This
is different from previous observations of ketolide series16 and
supposed here to be mainly because the conformations of the mac-
rolide core, different from those of ketolides,17 did not lead the side
chain to domain II of the 23S rRNA and, thus, no additional inter-
actions with the ribosome took place.18 Compared with compound
13, compound 14 showed at least a 4-fold more potent activity
against most pathogens. The same trend was observed when com-
paring 15–16, indicating that a 4000,6000-O-benzylidene acetal moiety
contributed to some extent to the enhancement of activity. We
speculated that the stronger activities of compounds 14 and 16
than 13 and 15 were due to hydrophobic interactions or aromatic
stacking effects between benzylidene groups with bacterial ribo-
some. The most active compound 14 exhibited 4-fold more active
against S. pyogenes ERSPy-1 than clarithromycin, 8-fold more ac-
tive against S. pneumoniae ERSP-2 and S. pyogenes 8902 than clar-
ithromycin, but still less potent than telithromycin.
In conclusion, a series of novel macrolides derivatives with
400-O-saccharide were synthesized. Derivatives with 400-O-saccha-
ride or with an incorporated 11,12-carbamate aryl–alkyl side chain
could not dramatically increase antibacterial activity compared
with the parent compound, suggesting that the bulky saccharide
structure did not fit well in the binding pocket and may have dis-
turbed the interactions of the macrolide with bacterial ribosome.
Even through, this work will enrich the structure types of de-
scribed macrolide derivatives and provide hints for future struc-
ture–activity relationship studies of macrolide antibiotics.
Supplementary data
1H NMR, 13C NMR, HRMS data of compounds 7a–7f, 13–16 and
experimental procedures of these compounds are available online
References and notes
1. Denis, A.; Agouridas, C.; Auger, J. M.; Benedetti, Y.; Bonefoy, A.; Breti, F.;
Chantot, J.-F.; Dussaratti, Y.; Fromentin, C.; D0Ambrieres, S. G.; Lachaud, S.;
Laurin, P.; Le Martret, O.; Loyau, V.; Tessot, N.; Pejac, J. M.; Perron, S. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 3075.
2. Ma, Z.; Clark, R. F.; Brazzale, A.; Plattner, J.; Or, Y. S. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 4137.
3. Sarbani, P. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 3171.
4. Liang, C.; Yao, S.; Chiu, Y.; Leung, P.; Robert, N.; Seddon, J.; Sears, P.; Hwang, C.;
Ichikawa, Y.; Romero, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 1307.
5. Asaka, T.; Manaka, A.; Sugiyama, H. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2003, 3, 961.
6. Kobori, T.; Sugimoto, K. Jpn. Kokai Tokkyo Koho. JP 11116592, 1999.
7. Su, W. G.; Smyth, K. T.; Rainville, J. P.; Kaneko, T.; Sutcliffe, J. A.; Brennan, L. A.;
Duignan, J. M.; Girard, A. E.; Finegan, S. M.; Cimochoski, C. R. 38th Intersci. Conf.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. San Diego, CA, 1998; Abstr. F123.
8. Ma, S.; Ma, R.; Liu, Z.; Ma, C.; Shen, X. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 4010.
9. Xu, P.; Liu, L.; Jin, Z.; Wang, G.; Liu, J.; Li, Y.; Lei, P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008,
18, 5507.
10. Yam, W. K.; Wahab, H. A. J. Chem. Inf. Model 2009, 49, 1558.
11. The synthesis methods of 4a–e were shown in Supplementary data.
12. Miroshnyk, I.; Mirza, S.; Zorky, P. M.; Heinamaki, J.; Yli-Kauhaluoma, J.;
Yliruusi, J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 232.
13. Xu, P.; Liu, L.; He, W.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Lei, P. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2009, 11,
880–897.
14. Tetsuya, T.; Toshifumi, A.; Masato, K.; Keiko, S.; Hiroyuki, S.; Masakazu, S.;
Kazuya, K.; Shigeo, M.; Atsushi, N. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 2706.
15. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for Dilution
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically, 5th ed.;
Approved Standard: NCCLS Document M7-A5; 2000, 20(2).
16. Takashi, N.; Tsutomu, I.; Tatsuro, Y.; Koichi, N.; Yukitoshi, N.; Koichi, U.;
Toshihiko, H.; Hideaki, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 6615.
17. Pfister, P.; Jenni, S.; Poehlsgaard, J.; Thomas, A.; Douthwaite, S.; Ban, N.;
Bottger, E. C. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 342, 1569.
Acknowledgments
18. George, G. Z.; Michael, W.; Ayman, N.; Lawern, M. V.; Aleksandra, W.; John, M.
E.; Alfred, S. G.; Stephen, D.; Daryl, J. H. Drugs 2002, 62, 1771.
This work was supported financially by the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (30572275) and National S&T Major