A. N. Magpusao et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 5472–5476
5475
Table 2
Activities of antiproliferative compounds in BT-20 breast cancer cells
b
Compound
MICa
(l
M)
IC50
(
lM)
95% confidence intervalc
(lM)
MLCd
(l
M)
Therapeutic index (MLC/MIC)
10
11
12
13
15
17
19a
19b
10
50
50
10
25
25
10
50
85.1
82.8–87.4
89.2–93.6
102.6–111.5
37.3–38.8
51.2–53.8
60.1–62.1
43.8–50.1
69.4–74.8
300
300
>300
50
75
100
75
30
6
>6
5
3
4
91.4
107.0
38.1
52.9
61.1
47.1
72.1
7.5
6
300
a
Minimum inhibitory concentration, defined as the lowest concentration at which there was a statistically significant reduction by Student’s t-test in mean cell number
from the mean control cell number at 48 h from three independent experiments (with four replicates for each treatment per experiment for 12 replicates total) in a
tetrazolium-salt-based assay.
b
Half-maximal concentration for inhibition of cell growth, calculated from mean cell numbers at 48 h for a range of concentrations of each compound.
c
95% confidence interval for the IC50
.
d
Minimum lethal concentration, defined as the lowest concentration at which there was a statistically significant reduction by Student’s t-test in mean cell number at 48 h
from the mean initial cell number.
concentration (IC50) values for the compounds’ antimigratory
activity. We concluded that the effects on wound closure observed
at subtoxic concentrations were likely due to incipient toxicity.
We next evaluated the effects of the compounds on the viability
and growth of BT-20 cells.16 We first tested these compounds at
100 lM and found that compounds 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, 19a,
and 19b displayed either subtoxic antiproliferative (cytostatic) or
cytotoxic activity at this concentration (Fig. 3). Compounds that
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant
GM077622 (to G. Fenteany) and National Science Foundation
Career Award CHE-0546311 (to M.W. Peczuh). K.J. Billings was
supported in part by National Science Foundation Research
Experience for Undergraduates Grant CHE-0754580. W.S. Fyvie
(University of Connecticut) prepared 4–6 and 8a, 8b.
were considered cytostatic at 100 lM (9, 10, 11, 12, and 19b) re-
duced the rate of cell proliferation over 48 h compared to controls
treated with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) alone but did not reduce
cell numbers below the initial values. Compounds that were con-
sidered cytotoxic at this concentration (13, 15, 17, and 19a) not
only inhibited cell growth but also caused a reduction in cell num-
bers from the initial values due to cell death.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (synthetic schemes and spectral data)
associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at
Compounds 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, 19a, and 19b exhibited either
pronounced cytostatic or cytotoxic activity in the initial assay at
References and notes
1. (a) Nakae, K.; Yoshimoto, Y.; Sawa, T.; Homma, Y.; Hamada, M.; Takeuchi, T.;
Imoto, M. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 2000, 53, 1130; (b) Nakae, K.; Yoshimoto, Y.; Ueda,
M.; Sawa, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Naganawa, H.; Takeuchi, T.; Imoto, M. J. Antibiot.
(Tokyo) 2000, 53, 1228.
2. Woo, E. J.; Starks, C. M.; Carney, J. R.; Arslanian, R.; Cadapan, L.; Zavala, S.; Licari,
P. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 2002, 55, 141.
3. (a) Ju, J.; Lim, S. K.; Jiang, H.; Seo, J. W.; Shen, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
11930; (b) Ju, J.; Lim, S. K.; Jiang, H.; Shen, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1622;
(c) Lim, S. K.; Ju, J.; Zazopoulos, E.; Jiang, H.; Seo, J. W.; Chen, Y.; Feng, Z.; Rajski,
S. R.; Farnet, C. M.; Shen, B. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 29746.
4. (a) Gaul, C.; Njardarson, J. T.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6042;
(b) Gaul, C.; Njardarson, J. T.; Shan, D.; Dorn, D. C.; Wu, K.-D.; Tong, W. P.;
Huang, X.-Y.; Moore, M. A. S.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
11326; (c) Njardarson, J. T.; Gaul, C.; Shan, D.; Huang, X.-Y.; Danishefsky, S. J. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1038; (d) Shan, D.; Chen, L.; Njardarson, J. T.; Gaul, C.;
Ma, X.; Danishefsky, S. J.; Huang, X. Y. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102,
3772; (e) Metaferia, B. B.; Chen, L.; Baker, H. L.; Huang, X.-Y.; Bewley, C. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 2434; (f) Ju, J.; Rajski, S. R.; Lim, S.-K.; Seo, J.-W.; Peters, N.
R.; Hoffmann, F. M.; Shen, B. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 5951; (g) Ju, J.;
Rajski, S. R.; Lim, S. K.; Seo, J. W.; Peters, N. R.; Hoffmann, F. M.; Shen, B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 1370; (h) Oskarsson, T.; Nagorny, P.; Krauss, I. J.; Perez, L.;
Mandal, M.; Yang, G.; Ouerfelli, O.; Xiao, D.; Moore, M. A. S.; Massagué, J.;
Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 3224.
5. Chen, L.; Yang, S.; Jakoncic, J.; Zhang, J. J.; Huang, X. Y. Nature 2010, 464, 1062.
6. Fenteany, G.; Zhu, S. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2003, 3, 593.
7. (a) Fyvie, W. S.; Peczuh, M. W. Chem. Commun. 2008, 4028; (b) Fyvie, W. S.;
Peczuh, M. W. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3626.
8. Grassia, A.; Bruno, I.; Debitus, C.; Marzocco, S.; Pinto, A.; Gomez-Paloma, L.;
Riccio, R. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 6257.
9. Ishibashi, M.; Takahashi, M.; Kobayashi, J. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 6062.
10. Gu, K.; Bi, L.; Zhao, M.; Wang, C.; Ju, J.; Peng, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15,
6273.
11. Casas, J.; Sundén, H.; Córdova, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 6117.
12. Porzelle, A.; Williams, C. M.; Schwartz, B. D.; Gentle, I. R. Synlett 2005, 2923.
13. BT-20, T47D, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-435, 4T1, and MDCK cells were obtained
from the American Tissue Culture Collection or Kam C. Yeung (University of
Toledo). Cells were grown in a tissue culture incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in
minimum essential medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) for BT-20 cells
or 10% newborn calf serum for MDCK cells, RPMI 1640 with 10% FBS (T47D and
100 lM and were tested over a range of concentration to establish
concentration–response profiles for each compound. Compound 9
only very weakly inhibited cell proliferation, and, when tested over
a range of concentrations, the concentration–response profile was
virtually flat.17 Compounds 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, 19a, and 19b, on
the other hand, displayed cytostatic activity that in most cases ap-
peared separable from the cytotoxicity observed at higher concen-
trations (Table 2). The criterion for this conclusion was based on
the MLC/MIC ratio (‘therapeutic index,’ often also defined as half-
maximal lethal concentration divided by the IC50). By this measure,
therefore, these compounds have subtoxic cytostatic activity, par-
ticularly in the case of 10, with a therapeutic index of 30.
The compounds possessing antiproliferative activity, 10, 11, 12,
13, 15, 17, 19a, and 19b, share common structural components
that had been included in their design. To our surprise, the [13]-
macro-dilactone unit was not essential for activity. All of the bioac-
tive compounds contain a glucosyl unit and an octyl (C8) chain.
Furthermore, the majority of these molecules contain an a-linkage
between the glucose unit and the alkyl chain. However, the most
promising compounds, as measured by either therapeutic index
(compound 10) or IC50 (compound 13), contained the [13]-
macro-dilactone. In the case of 10 in particular, the cytostatic
and cytotoxic activities were clearly separable, with a wide con-
centration range for its subtoxic antiproliferative activity. Based
on this and its micromolar IC50, it is likely that 10 does not act
by merely having a non-specific effect on cells, such as disrupting
the integrity of cellular membranes. Instead, this compound may
target some factor(s) involved in cell cycle progression. In sum-
mary, we have demonstrated the application of our published syn-
thesis to access a novel class of antiproliferative agents.