laboratory on the kilogram scale. Preliminary experiments
were then run for the application of this water-soluble ligand
on the enantioselective transfer hydrogenation of prochiral
ketones by its mono-N-tosylated derivative 3. The enantio-
selective transfer hydrogenation of prochiral ketones has been
achieved using a range of catalysts.6 Among the best catalysts
for these reactions are ruthenium complexes using chiral
mono-N-tosylated vicinal diamine as ligand; developed by
Noyori7 and Knochel.8 We also studied dendritic Noyori
catalysts for asymmetric transfer hydrogenation of prochiral
ketones,9 which afforded good recyclable activity and
enantioselectivity.9a But there are still some environmental
problems existing in these homogeneous and heterogeneous
systems. The water-soluble chiral ruthenium-complex-
catalyzed reduction of prochiral ketones in aqueous media
may provide the green practice. Recently, Chung10a-c and
Ogo10d reported transfer hydrogenation of ketones with
HCO2Na as a hydrogen donor promoted by the chiral and
achiral water-soluble Ru(II) complexes, respectively. Also,
Williams11 reported the asymmetric transfer hydrogenation
of ketones in aqueous media with 2-propanol as a hydrogen
donor.
The water-soluble ruthenium catalyst was prepared by
reacting [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 with (R,R)-3 at 40 °C for 1 h
in aqueous media in the concentration of 0.01 M, and a
purple Ru(II) complex was only observed in aqueous phase
after biphasic separation. (R)-Phenethyl alcohol with high
conversion and enantioselectivity (Table 1) was obtained in
Table 1. Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation of
Acetophenone in Aqueous Mediaa
metal
complexesb
HCO2Na
(equiv)
convnc
(%)
eec
entry
1
(%)
configd
[RuCl2 (p-Cy)]2
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
10
>99
>99
34
61
95
95
R
R
R
R
R
2e [RuCl2 (p-Cy)]2
93
89
94
93
ND
90
3f
[RuCl2 (p-Cy)]2
4g [RuCl2 (p-Cy)]2
5g,h [RuCl2 (p-Cy)]2
6i
7
8
9
[RuCl2 (p-Cy)]2
[RuCl2 (p-Cy)]2
[RuCl2 (p-Cy)]2
[RuCl2 (p-Cy)]2 HCO2NH4 (5)
[RuCl2 (p-Cy)]2 HCO2NH4 (10)
<1
47
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
The chiral water-soluble ligand (R,R)-2 was prepared by
>99 (75)j 94 (94)j
1
direct sulfonation as shown in Scheme 1. H NMR, 13C
3
5
17
66
10
92
7
29
94
71
58
84
10
11k [RuCl2 (p-Cy)]2
5
5
5
5
12
13
14
[RuCl2(PhH)]2
[Cp*IrCl2]2
[Cp*RhCl2]2
Scheme 1
a Unless otherwise noted, the reaction was carried out in organic solvent
free system at 40 °C for 24 h with 4 mol % SDS and S/C ) 100. b Cy )
cymene. c The conversion and ee were determined by GLC on a CP-
Cyclodex B-236 M column. d Configuration was determined by the sign
of rotation of the isolated product. e 15-Crown-5 was added as phase-transfer
catalyst. f The reaction was conducted without PTC or surfactant. g S/C )
200. h The reaction time is 48 h. i S/C ) 1000. j The data in parentheses
was obtained from the second recycling. k The reaction was carried out at
28 °C.
the transfer hydrogenation of acetophenone without any
organic solvent after 24 h at 40 °C with this water-soluble
catalyst system, in which the best ratio of (R,R)-3 and [RuCl2-
(p-cymene)]2 is 2.2:1. Both SDS and 15-crown-5 as phase-
transfer catalysts (PTC) gave >99% conversion and good
enantioselectivity (95% and 93% ee, entries 1 and 2).
However, poor conversion and lower enantioselectivity were
observed without any PTC or surfactants (entry 3). Although
asymmetric reduction of acetophenone with S/C ) 200
proceeded to give chiral alcohol in 95% yield with 93% ee
by prolonging reaction time to 48 h (entries 4 and 5), an
increase in the ratio of S/C to 1000 caused a significant
NMR, and IR analyses showed that only o-sulfonated product
was provided.12 Subsequently, the mono-N-tosylated deriva-
tive (R,R)-3 was obtained by tosylation, and we initially
tested the ruthenium-catalyzed transfer hydrogenation of
acetophenone in aqueous media employing HCO2Na10 as the
source of hydrogen.
(6) For reviews on asymmetric transfer hydrogenation, see: (a) Palmer,
M. J.; Wills, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 2045-2061. (b) Noyori,
R.; Hashiguchi, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 97-102. (c) Zassinovich, G.
Mestroni, G.; Gladiali. S. Chem. ReV. 1992, 92, 1051-1069.
(7) (a) Fujii, A.; Hashiguchi, S.; Uematsu, N.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2521-2522. (b) Hashiguchi, S.; Fujii, A.;
Takehara, J.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7562-
7563. (c) Matsumura, K.; Hashiguchi, S.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R. J. Am.
Soc. Soc. 1997, 119, 8738-8739.
(8) Pu¨ntener, K.; Schwink, L.; Knochel, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37,
8165-8168.
(9) (a) Chen, Y. C.; Wu, T. F.; Deng, J. G.; Liu, H.; Jiang, Y. Z.; Choi,
M. C. K.; Chan, A. S. C. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1488-1489. (b) Chen, Y.
C.; Wu, T. F.; Deng, J. G.; Liu, H.; Cui, X.; Zhu, J.; Jiang, Y. Z.; Choi, M.
C. K.; Chan, A. S. C. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 5301-5306.
(10) (a) Rhyoo, H. Y.; Yoon, Y. A.; Park, H. J.; Chung, Y. K.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5045-5048. (b) Rhyoo, H. Y.; Park, H. J.;
Chung, Y. K. Chem. Commun. 2001, 2064-2065. (c) Rhyoo, H. Y.; Park,
H. J.; Suh, W. H.; Chung, Y. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 269-272. (d)
Ogo, S.; Abura, T.; Watanabe, Y. Organometallics 2002, 21, 2964-2969.
(11) (a) Bubert, C.; Blacker, J.; Brown, S. M.; Crosby, J.; Fitzjohn, S.;
Muxworthy, J. P.; Thorpe, T.; Williams, J. M. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001,
42, 4037-4039. (b) Thorpe, T.; Blacker, J.; Brown, S. M.; Bubert, C.;
Crosby, J.; Fitzjohn, S.; Muxworthy, J. P.; Williams, J. M. J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2001, 42, 4041-4043.
(12) See the Supporting Information.
2104
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 12, 2003