C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
mM NaCl (see Table S2), which was ∼40 °C higher than that of the
corresponding DNA duplex (25.1 °C). The Tm of a GNA duplex
involving 18 A-T base pairs was reported to be 63 °C, which also
exceeded the stability of the corresponding DNA duplex by 22.5 °C
in the presence of 200 mM NaCl.2a Although we could not compare
the stability of aTNA with GNA precisely, the aTNA duplex appears
to be much more stable than the GNA duplex.9
According to Meggers,2a even single-stranded GNA showed a
significant Cotton effect, indicating that helical preorganization of the
GNA backbone had already formed in the single strand, allowing
formation of a duplex that was highly stable in comparison with native
ones. However, single-stranded aTNA did not form such a helical
preorganized structure, as shown in Figure 3c,d. It should be noted
that although aTNA is more flexible than DNA or GNA, it still formed
a remarkably stable duplex in an antiparallel manner.10
In conclusion, we have developed from threoninol a new artificial
oligonucleotide, aTNA, that forms an unexpectedly stable duplex
in an antiparallel fashion. Even nucleobases tethered on a flexible
scaffold that did not take a preorganized structure in the single-
stranded state could form a duplex that was remarkably more stable
than DNA or RNA duplexes by inducing formation of a right-
handed double-helical structure. Our findings might allow for the
new design of artificial duplexes that do not rely on rigid
preorganization. Furthermore, by combining the “threoninol
nucleotides”4,5 that tether functional molecules with the present
aTNA, functional foldamers can be prepared.
Figure 3. Temperature dependence of the CD spectra of (a) aTNA-M(t)/
aTNA-N(a) and (b) native DNA-M(t)/DNA-N(a) duplexes and single-
stranded (c) aTNA-M(t) and (d) aTNA-N(a). Conditions: [oligonucleotide]
) 5 µM, [NaCl] ) 100 mM, 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0).
parallel aTNA-N(a) (see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information).
In order to substantiate that canonical Watson-Crick base-pairing
dominates the stable association of aTNAs, the effect of mismatches
on Tm was examined with aTNA-M(t). As listed in Table S1 in
the Supporting Information, we found that introduction of a T-C
mismatch [aTNA-M(t)/aTNA-N(c)] significantly lowered the Tm
from 62.7 to 49.2 °C. Similarly, T-T and T-G mismatches
destabilized the duplex by 8 and 3.7 °C, respectively.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid
for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures for
the syntheses of aTNAs and spectroscopic measurements, melting
profiles and temperatures of duplexes, and NMR spectra. This material
Next, the aTNA duplex was analyzed by circular dichroism (CD)
spectroscopy. As shown in Figure 3a, hybridization of aTNA-M(t)
and aTNA-N(a) below Tm for the duplex induced a symmetrical
positive-negative Cotton effect similar to that seen for the typical
B-type DNA-M(t)/DNA-N(a) duplex (compare panel b with panel
a in Figure 3), demonstrating that hybridization of aTNA allowed
the formation of a right-handed helix. However, the induced CD
decreased with increasing temperature and became very weak at
80 °C, where the duplex was completely dissociated. CD analysis
of single-stranded aTNA-M(t) and aTNA-N(a) revealed that the
shapes of their CD spectra in the 200-300 nm region were entirely
different from that of the duplex (compare panels c and d with
panel a in Figure 3). Although the individual strands are chiral
oligomers, their CD signals were very small at all temperatures
examined here, indicating that single-stranded aTNA did not take
a particularly preorganized structure but existed as a random coil.
Nevertheless, hybridization of these strands induced formation of
a right-handed double-helical structure.
Comparison of the thermal stability of aTNA with those of other
natural duplexes revealed that the aTNA duplex is exceptionally stable.
As described above, the Tm of the aTNA-M(t)/aTNA-N(a) duplex
was 62.7 °C. However, the corresponding DNA and RNA duplexes
(DNA-M(t)/DNA-N(a) and RNA-M(t)/RNA-N(a)) yielded Tm values
of only 29.0 and 38.9 °C, respectively, which are far lower than that
of the corresponding aTNA duplex. We also examined other sequences
and found that the aTNA duplex was remarkably stable irrespective
of the sequence. For example, a 12-mer aTNA duplex composed of
only A and T gave a Tm as high as 64.3 °C in the presence of 100
References
(1) (a) Eschenmoser, A. Science 1999, 284, 2118–2124. (b) Nielsen, P. E. Acc.
Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 624–630.
(2) (a) Zhang, L.; Peritz, A.; Meggers, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4174–
4175. (b) Schlegel, M. K.; Peritz, A. E.; Kittigowittana, K.; Zhang, L.;
Meggers, E. ChemBioChem 2007, 8, 927–932. (c) Schlegel, M. K.; Zhang,
L.; Pagano, N.; Meggers, E. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 476–482. (d)
Schlegel, M. K.; Xie, X.; Zhang, L.; Meggers, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2009, 48, 960–963. (e) Schlegel, M. K.; Essen, L.-O.; Meggers, E. Chem.
Commun. 2010, 46, 1094–1096.
(3) Hecht, S.; Huc, I. Foldamers; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2007.
(4) Kashida, H.; Liang, X. G.; Asanuma, H. Curr. Org. Chem. 2009, 13, 1065–
1084, and references cited therein.
(5) (a) Kashida, H.; Fujii, T.; Asanuma, H. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 2892–
2899. (b) Fujii, T.; Kashida, H.; Asanuma, H. Chem.sEur. J. 2009, 15,
10092–10102.
(6) The acronym “TNA” was previously used by Eschenmoser for the threofura-
nosyl oligonucleotide. See: Scho¨ning, K.-U.; Scholz, P.; Guntha, S.; Wu, X.;
Krishnamurthy, R.; Eschenmoser, A. Science 2000, 290, 1347–1351.
(7) (a) Rana, V. S.; Kumar, V. A.; Ganesh, K. N. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
1997, 7, 2837–2842. (b) Sharma, A. K.; Kumar, P.; Gupta, K. C. HelV.
Chim. Acta 2001, 84, 3643–3649. (c) Ramasamy, K. S.; Seifert, W. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 1996, 6, 1799–1804.
(8) For examples of other fully changed artificial duplexes, see: (a) Wittung,
P.; Nielsen, P. E.; Buchardt, O.; Egholm, M.; Norden, B. Nature 1994,
368, 561–563. (b) Koshkin, A. A.; Nielsen, P.; Meldgaard, M.; Rajwanshi,
V. K.; Singh, S. K.; Wengel, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 13252–
13253. (c) Jungmann, O.; Wippo, H.; Stanek, M.; Huynh, H. K.;
Krishnamurthy, R.; Eschenmoser, A. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1527–1530. (d)
Egger, A.; Hunziker, J.; Rihs, G.; Leumann, C. HelV. Chim. Acta 1998,
82, 734–743. (e) Ahn, D.-R.; Mosimann, M.; Leumann, C. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 68, 7693–7699.
(9) We also examined the cross-pairing of aTNA with DNA or RNA. However,
unlike GNA, it hybridized with neither DNA nor RNA under the conditions
employed here (see Figure S2).
(10) Flexible peptide nucleic acid (PNA) oligomers that do not have negative
charges on their backbones also form remarkably stable duplexes with each
other (see ref 8a).
JA105539U
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 42, 2010 14703