895
Table 2. Reactions between diethyl 2-methylmalonate (4a) and
several alkynes 2a
nium intermediate; (3-a) intramolecular nucleophilic addition to
give cyclic intermediate A.12 Another possible route for the
formation of cyclic intermediate A is path B: (1-b) formation of a
rhenacyclopentene intermediate by oxidative cycloaddition be-
tween a 1,3-diester, an alkyne, and a rhenium catalyst; (2-b)
insertion of second alkyne into the rhenium-carbon bond of the
formed rhenacyclopentene intermediate. After the formation of
cyclic intermediate A, (4) a salicylate is produced by the elimi-
nation of an alcohol when R2 = H. In the case of R2 = Me, (5) a
cyclic ¢-keto ester is generated via the elimination of an alcohol.
In summary, we have succeeded in the regioselective synthesis
of salicylates from 1,3-diesters without a substituent at the active
methylene moiety and terminal alkynes using a rhenium catalyst,
Re2(CO)10. On the other hand, using 1,3-diesters bearing a
substituent at the active methylene moiety, phenol derivatives
were obtained. In these reactions, two substituents from terminal
alkynes are introduced at the para-positions.13 We hope that these
reactions will become a useful method to regioselectively
synthesize phenol derivatives.
OH
1) Re2(CO)10 (2.5 mol%)
toluene, 135 °C, 24 h
O
O
R
+
R
EtO
OEt
2) In(OTf)3 (3.0 mol%)
150 °C, 24 h
R
4a
2
6
Entry
R
Conversion/%b
Yield/%c
1
2
3
4
4-MeOC6H4 2b
4-MeC6H4 2c
4-CF3C6H4 2d
4-BrC6H4 2e
68
82
86
58
6b
6c
6d
6e
47 (69)
54 (66)
47 (55)
12 (21)
a2 (2.5 equiv). bDetermined by 1H NMR. cIsolated yield. Isolated yield based on
conversion is reported in parentheses.
Path A
OH
O
OH
O
O
O
R3
R3
R1O
(2-a) Re
R3
OR1
R1O
OR1
R2
R3
R2
R3
R1O
OR1
(1-a)
Re
R2
alkenylrhenium
intermediate
(3-a)
− Re
References and Notes
1
a) D. B. Grotjahn, in Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry II,
ed. by L. S. Hegedus, E. W. Abel, F. G. A. Stone, G. Wilkinson,
Pergamon, Oxford, 1995, Vol. 12, pp. 741-770. b) H.
Bonnemann, W. Brijoux, in Transition Metals for Organic
Synthesis, ed. by M. Beller, C. Bolm, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
2004, Vol. 1, pp. 171-197.
H. Tsuji, K.-i. Yamagata, T. Fujimoto, E. Nakamura, J. Am. Chem.
Investigation of several catalysts: ReBr(CO)5, 4%. No reaction:
[ReBr(CO)3(thf)]2, Mn2(CO)10, MnBr(CO)5, Cr(CO)6, Mo(CO)6,
Fe2(CO)9, Fe3(CO)12, Ru3(CO)12, Ir4(CO)12, Rh4(CO)12, Co2-
(CO)8.
128, 11368. b) Y. Kuninobu, A. Kawata, M. Nishi, H. Takata, K.
When the reaction was carried out at 180 °C, only 3a was formed
in 63% yield.
Investigation of several catalysts: ReBr(CO)5, 17%; [ReBr-
(CO)3(thf)]2, 22%. No reaction: Mn2(CO)10, MnBr(CO)5,
Cr(CO)6, Mo(CO)6, W(CO)6, Fe2(CO)9, Fe3(CO)12, Ru3(CO)12,
Ir4(CO)12, Rh4(CO)12, Co2(CO)8.
HO OR1
Path B
(2-b)
HO OR1
O
O
R3
R2
R3
R3
CO2R1
R2
R3
CO2R1
R3
Re
R1O
OR1
OH
(1-b)
− Re
2 = Me
R2
A
2 = H
− R1
rhenacyclopentene
intermediate
R
R
− R1
OH
(4)
OH
2
3
4
(5)
O
O
OH O
R3
R3
R3
In(OTf)3
OR1
OR1
R3
R3
R3
Scheme 1. Proposed mechanism for the formation of phenol
derivatives 3 and 6.
5
eliminated from 5a, and phenol derivative 6a was obtained in 73%
yield (79% conversion) (eq 4).10,11
6
7
OH
1) Re2(CO)10 (2.5 mol%)
toluene, 135 °C, 24 h
O
O
Ph
ð4Þ
+
Ph
EtO
OEt
2) In(OTf)3 (3.0 mol%)
Ph
4a
2a (2.5 equiv)
150 °C, 24 h
6a 73%
8
9
Investigation of several solvents: neat 3a 32%, 4a 8%;
CH2ClCH2Cl 3a 39%, 4a 10%; THF 3a 19%, 4a trace; CH3CN
3a 0%, 4a 0%; N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) 3a 0%, 4a 0%.
Investigation of several catalysts: Fe(OTf)3, 6a 66%; In(OTf)3, 6a
78%; Cu(OTf)2, 6a 71%; AgOTf, 6a 58%.
Next, several terminal alkynes were investigated (Table 2).
Terminal alkynes with an electron-donating group, 2b and 2c,
provided phenol derivatives 6b and 6c in 69% and 66% yields,
respectively (Entries 1 and 2), whereas the yield of phenol
derivative was slightly decreased when terminal alkyne bearing an
electron-withdrawing group, 2d, was employed (Entry 3). The
corresponding phenol derivative 6e was generated in low yield
using 4-bromophenylacetylene (2e) (Entry 4). The corresponding
phenol derivatives were not formed using o-tolylacetylene (2f) and
diphenylacetylene, and 1-dodecyne (2g) gave a complex mixture.
When salicylates 3 and phenol derivatives 6 are formed,
intermediate A is a key intermediate. There are two possible
pathways to produce intermediate A (Scheme 1). In path A, the
sequence is as follows: (1-a) formation of an alkenylrhenium
intermediate by nucleophilic addition of a 1,3-diester to an alkyne,
which is activated by a rhenium catalyst; (2-a) insertion of second
alkyne into the rhenium-carbon bond of the formed alkenylrhe-
10 Phenol derivative 6a was obtained in 92% yield by the treatment
with 3.0 mol % of In(OTf)3 after the isolation of the cyclic ¢-keto
ester 5a.
11 When ¢-keto ester 5a was treated at 150 °C for 24 h with
powdered NaOH instead of In(OTf)3, decarboxylation of the ¢-
keto ester proceeded to give 6a in 41% yield (cf. In(OTf)3, 58%).
In contrast, the decarboxylation did not occur with NaI.
12 Very recently, Nakamura’s group reported theoretical calculations
on the regioselective formation of benzoates from ¢-keto esters
and two equivalents of terminal alkynes. The results suggest that
the reactions proceed via a similar route as shown in Scheme 1,
Path A. See: N. Yoshikai, S. Zhang, K.-i. Yamagata, H. Tsuji, E.
13 Supporting Information is available electronically on the CSJ-
Chem. Lett. 2010, 39, 894-895
© 2010 The Chemical Society of Japan