Angewandte
Chemie
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201002282
Aromaticity
Metal Complexes of Chiral Mꢀbius Aromatic
[28]Hexaphyrin(1.1.1.1.1.1): Enantiomeric Separation, Absolute
Stereochemistry, and Asymmetric Synthesis**
Takayuki Tanaka, Tsutomu Sugita, Sumito Tokuji, Shohei Saito, and Atsuhiro Osuka*
The concept of Mꢀbius aromaticity, first proposed by
Heilbronner in 1964, predicts the aromatic characters for
[4np]annulenes with singly twisted so-called Mꢀbius top-
ology.[1] Importantly, this concept complements the estab-
lished Hꢁckel aromaticity that is based on normal planar p-
electronic network,[1,2] and therefore stimulates both theoret-
ical and experimental studies. Among these studies, the first
Mꢀbius aromatic [16]annulene was reported by Herges and
co-workers in 2003,[3] and was followed by an interesting
example of a di-p-benzi-hexaphyrin that exhibited a temper-
ature dependent structural change between Hꢁckel and
Mꢀbius conformations.[4] In the last two years, Mꢀbius
aromatic systems have been efficiently prepared starting
Figure 1. Two enantiomers of hexaphyrin metal complexes. C6F5
groups at the meso positions were omitted for simplicity.
from meso-aryl-substituted expanded porphyrins through
metal coordination,[5a,b] temperature control,[5c,d] protonatio-
n,[5e,f] and intramolecular fusion reactions.[5g,h]
Macrocycles that have a singly twisted Mꢀbius topology
are intrinsically chiral, and can be either P-twist or M-twist, as
shown in Figure 1. Control of the chirality of Mꢀbius aromatic
expanded porphyrins is important to understand their mag-
netic properties and to apply these systems to chirality sensing
and asymmetric catalysts. Although the enatiomeric separa-
tion of Mꢀbius aromatic annulenes has been accomplished by
Herges and co-workers, their absolute configurations have
not been determined.[3b] In addition, only limited examples of
the enantiomeric separations of twisted expanded porphyrins
have been reported to date.[6]
We envisioned the enantiomeric separation of Group 10
metal complexes of [28]hexaphyrin(1.1.1.1.1.1) on the basis
that hexaphyrins are considered to be rather robust, as
indicated by their almost temperature-independent 1H NMR
spectra. Herein, we report the enantiomeric separation of
these complexes by using preparative HPLC on a chiral
stationary phase, as well as the asymmetric synthesis of the
palladium(II) complex.
[28]Hexaphyrin(1.1.1.1.1.1) complexes of PdII (2), NiII (3),
and PtII (4) were prepared according to a previously reported
method that entailed the addition of PdCl2, Ni(acac)2, and
PtCl2 at reflux for 12 hours, 1 hour, and 5 days, respectively
(acac = acetylacetonate).[5a,7] In the case of complex 2, we
found a far more effective method that entailed treatment of
[26]hexaphyrin(1.1.1.1.1.1) 1 (see Scheme 1 for structure)
with [Pd2(dba)3] in the presence of sodium acetate in a
mixture of CH2Cl2/MeOH (dba = 1,5-diphenyl-1,4-pentadien-
3-one). This method produced complex 2 in 75% yield at
room temperature in 2 hours. The enantiomeric separation of
complex 2 was examined by using an analytical HPLC column
(SUMICHIRAL OA-3100; f= 10 mm), which, after exten-
sive experimentation, led to a clear separation of the
enantiomers with a mixture of CH2Cl2/n-hexane (v/v = 1:1)
as an eluent (See the Supporting Information). Based on this
finding, the preparative chiral separation of complex 2 was
performed successfully on a larger HPLC column (f=
20 mm) with a less polar eluent (CH2Cl2/n-hexane, v/v =
1:2). Under similar conditions, the enantiomeric separations
of complexes 3 and 4 were also successfully accomplished.
The spectra of the isolated enantiomers displayed oppo-
site Cotton effects (Figure 2). The CD spectrum of the
enantiomer that eluted first, 2A, shows the first Cotton effect
as a negative–positive bisignate split signal around 639 nm,
and the second signal as a positive Cotton effect at 397 nm
(Figure 2a). The enantiomers of 3 and 4 that eluted first show
practically the same CD spectra as those of 2; the bisignate
split signal and the positive signal at 639 and 387 nm for 3A
and at 619 and 383 nm for 4A, respectively (Figure 2b,c). The
large De values ( ꢀ 300mÀ1 cmÀ1) for these enantiomers,
[*] T. Tanaka, T. Sugita, S. Tokuji, Dr. S. Saito, Prof. Dr. A. Osuka
Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science
Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502 (Japan)
Fax: (+81)75-753-3970
E-mail: osuka@kuchem.kyoto-u.ac.jp
[**] This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid (nos. 19205006 (A) and
20108001 “pi-Space”) from the MEXT. T.T. and S.S. acknowledge a
JSPS Fellowship for Young Scientists. We thank Prof. H. Sugiyama,
Kyoto University, for the CD measurement.
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6619 –6621
ꢀ 2010 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
6619