an attempt to prepare the rhodium(V) complex using the
described method in a nitrogen atmosphere failed while
bubbling oxygen through rhodium(III)chloride in DMSO in
the presence of H(htbh) produced the complex in two days in
powder form (agitation inhibited crystal growth). In addition,
tris(o-hydroxythiobenzhydrazido)rhodium(III) could be prepared
by the reaction between an aqueous solution of rhodium(III)
chloride and H(htbh) at pH 6.5–7.0; the compound is soluble
in most organic solvents.
The newly formed ligand 2,20-[(E)-diazene-1,2-diyldicarbono-
dithioyl]diphenol has two N, S, and O donor sites. All chloride
ions and (3 ꢀ n)DMSO molecules from one molecule of the
compound [RhO2Cln(DMSO)4ꢀn
]
(1ꢀn) were substituted by N, S,
O atoms from each donor site leading to the formation of a
binuclear rhodium(V) complex. The oxygen atom of one DMSO
molecule still remained coordinated to each rhodium(V) creating
an octahedral environment.
That the newly synthesized rhodium(V) complex is a
4
low-spin t2g system is evident from its magnetic moment
Fig. 2 ORTEP views (30% probability thermal ellipsoids) of the
molecular structure of the complex (C18H20N2O8Rh2S4) together with
the atomic numbering scheme. Selected bond lengths (A):
Rh(1)–S(18)$1 = 2.340(3), Rh(1)–N(19) = 2.261(5), Rh(1)–O(11) =
value (magnetic susceptibility was measured with
a
MAGWAY MFG Mk 1, Sherwood Scientific Ltd, UK) of
2.80 BM per rhodium at 300 K. From the magnetic moment
value it may be concluded that there is no significant Rh–Rh
interaction in the complex. In view of the large distance
between two rhodium centers (6.310 A) no such interaction
is expected. The infrared (IR) spectrum of the complex (KBr
disk, using a Unicam SP3-300S) shows a sharp band at
855 cmꢀ1 and the IR spectrum of H(htbh) showed a band at
840 cmꢀ1 which is absent in that of the complex. The sharpness
and high intensity of the band at 855 cmꢀ1 suggests it is due to
the RhQO stretching frequency.
1.953(4), Rh(1)–O(31)
=
2.305(5), Rh(1)–O(1)
=
1.700(5),
Rh(1)–O(2) = 1.712(5), C(18)–S(18) = 1.661(7), C(18)–N(19) =
1.323(9), C(12)–O(11) = 1.365(7), N(19)–N(19)$1 = 1.393(10).
effect of the terminal oxygen atoms O(1) and O(2) in the
coordination sphere. Thus the four atoms in the equatorial
plane, O(2), O(11), N(19) and S(18)$1 show a r.m.s. deviation
of 0.349 A with the metal 0.083 A from the plane in the
direction of O(1).
The structure of C18H20N2Rh2O8S4 was solved using X-ray
crystallographyy and direct methods using the SHELXS97.6 The
non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic thermal
parameters. The hydrogen atoms bonded to carbon and
nitrogen were included in geometric positions and given
thermal parameters equivalent to 1.2 times those of the atom
to which they were attached. An absorption correction was
carried out using the ABSPACK program.6 The structure was
The C–S, C–N and N–N bond lengths in H(htbh) are
1.6853(15) A, 1.3289(19) and 1.4187(18) Az respectively
compared to 1.661(7), 1.323(9) and 1.393(10) A in the complex.
Both sets of distances are intermediate between formal single-
bond and double-bond lengths and they indicate extensive
electron delocalization.
The NQN covalent bond distance in azenes is 1.252(1) A.7
In the complex it changes to 1.393(2) A indicating extensive
delocalization of double bond on complex formation.
Comparison of the bond lengths in the coordinated ligand
with those in the H(htbh) shows that both the C–S and C–N
bonds suffer contraction. These changes in bond length are
attributable to stabilization of the ligand. The phenolic C–O
length increases a little, signifying the removal of phenolic
hydrogen upon coordination.
6
refined on F2 using SHELXL97 to R1 0.0659, wR2 0.1844 for
2777 reflections with I 4 2s(I).
The structure of the binuclear rhodium(V) complex together
with the atomic numbering scheme is given in Fig. 2.
The structure of the binuclear complex has a crystallo-
graphic centre of symmetry with formula
[(RhO2)2(C6H4(O)–C(QS)– NQN–C(QS)(O)C6H4)(DMSO)2].
The Rh(1)–O(1) and Rh(1)–O(2), metal-to-terminal-oxygen
bond lengths are 1.700(5), 1.712(5) A respectively. These bond
lengths are shorter than that [1.953(4) A] of Rh(1)–O(11) by
more than 0.2 A. The fact signifies the double-bond character
of Rh(1)–O(1) and Rh(1)–O(2) bonds. The most significant
feature in the structure of the complex is the involvement of
the methyl hydrogen of C(33)$1–H in H-bonding with O(1). It
explains the small difference between Rh(1)–O(1) and
Rh(1)–O(2) bond lengths.
Each rhodium(V) ion is six-coordinate with a distorted
octahedral environment, being bonded to two mutually cis
terminal oxygens, nitrogen, sulphur and oxygen from ligand
2,20-[(E)-diazene-1,2-diyldicarbonodithioyl]diphenol together
with one oxygen atom of a DMSO molecule. The ligand thus
has two tridentate donor sites, each site coordinating in a mer
configuration to a RhO2+, forming six and five-membered
rings respectively with bite angles of 81.9(2)1 for
O(11)–Rh(1)–N(19) and 78.6(2)1 for N(19)–Rh(1)-S(18)$1,
$1 = symmetry element 2 ꢀ x, 2 ꢀ y, 1 ꢀ z. The ligand is
significantly distorted from planarity, no doubt because of the
We thank the EPSRC (U.K.) and the University of Reading
for funds for the diffractometer. Financial assistance received
from the Higher Education Department, Government of West
Bengal is gratefully acknowledged.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 7436–7438 7437